Advertisement

Transformative Behaviors

  • M. Javad KhajaviEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the focus is on the transformative qualities of Islamic calligraphy. Through theory and praxis, the chapter explores the situation in which calligraphic forms change shape so completely that they lose their initial verbal identity entirely. It begins by examining some historical examples of calligraphic art, explaining how letters and words seem to desire to transform and become something other than text in many specimens of Islamic calligraphy. The focus of this chapter, then, shifts toward temporal text-based art. It explores how these transformative qualities of Islamic calligraphy may be manifested in visual time-based media. It is shown that calligraphic forms which are in transformation change identity. Indeed, forms in time-based calligraphic art and animated typography may oscillate between having verbal, abstract, and representational identities. In such a situation, where the identity of calligraphic forms shifts over time, calligraphic forms reach a so-called state of “flux.” Further, different categories of temporal behavior that may lead to transformation of identity in temporal text-based art are explored: metamorphosis, (de)construction, and revelation. Finally, the chapter explains how legibility fluctuation affects meaning-making.

Keywords

(De)construction Flux Identity Legibility fluctuation Metamorphosis Revelation Transformative 

References

  1. Albayrak, O. (2012). The irreversible line: Adornian contribution and communication through the use of the Arabic script in the videos of Mona Hatoum and Kutluğ Ataman. Master’s thesis, Stony Brook University, New York. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (Order No. 1519132).Google Scholar
  2. Ali, W. (1997). Modern Islamic art: Development and continuity. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  3. Amirsadeghi, H. (Ed.). (2010). Unleashed: Contemporary art from Turkey. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  4. Bellantoni, J., & Woolman, M. (2000). Type in motion: Innovations in digital graphics. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  5. Blair, S. S. (2006). Islamic calligraphy. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brownie, B. (2012a). The behaviours of fluid characterforms in temporal typography. Doctoral dissertation, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK. Retrieved from http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.573315. British Library EThOS database.
  7. Brownie, B. (2012b). Fluid typography: Construction, metamorphosis and revelation. In G. Lees-Maffei (Ed.), Writing design: Words and objects (English ed., pp. 175–186). Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar
  8. Brownie, B. (2015). Transforming type: New directions in kinetic typography. London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Daftari, F. (2006). Without boundary: Seventeen ways of looking. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  11. Ettinghausen, R. (1957). The ‘Wade Cup’ in the Cleveland Museum of Art, its origin and decorations. Ars Orientalis, 2, 327–366.Google Scholar
  12. Fehervari, G. (1970). Art and architecture. In P. M. Holt, A. K. S. Lambton, & B. Lewis (Eds.), The Cambridge history of Islam (Vol. 2B, pp. 702–740). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gaze, T. (2008). Asemic movement 1. Retrieved from http://vugg.wippiespace.com/vugg/gaze/asemicmovement1.pdf
  14. Grabar, O. (1992). The mediation of ornament. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Grabar, O. (2009). When is a bird a bird? Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society Conference, 153(3), 247–253.Google Scholar
  16. Grohmann, A. (1957). The origin and early development of floriated Kūfic. Ars Orientalis, 2, 183–213.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkes, T. (2003). Structuralism and semiotics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hillner, M. (2005). Text in (e)motion. Visual Communication, 4(2), 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hillner, M. (2006a). Virtual typography: Time perception in relation to digital communication. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 14(5-6), 1–6.Google Scholar
  20. Hillner, M. (2006b, November 13). Virtual(ly) typography—Towards a notion of poetics. Retrieved from http://www.ico-d.org/connect/features/post/253.php
  21. Hillner, M. (2009). Virtual typography. Lausanne, Switzerland: AVA Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Kac, E. (1995). Holopoetry: Essays, manifestos, critical and theoretical writings. Lexington, KY: New Media Editions.Google Scholar
  23. Khajavi, M. J. (2018). From Alhambra to digital projection: Designing a digital media cultural heritage project based on the transformative qualities of Islamic calligraphy. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 364.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/364/1/012053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Khatibi, A., & Sijelmassi, M. (1995). The splendour of Islamic calligraphy. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, N. M. (2000). Animation and animorphs: A brief disappearing act. In V. Sobchack (Ed.), Meta morphing: Visual transformation and the culture of quick-change (pp. 21–39). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mahmoud Hammad a Syrian Master of Abstract Art (1923–1988). (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.mahmoudhammad.com/about-1/
  27. Marks, L. U. (2010a). Enfoldment and infinity: An Islamic genealogy of new media art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Marks, L. U. (2010b). Words dream of being flowers, birds dream of language. In S. Zielinski & E. Fürlus (Eds.), Variantology 4: On deep time relations of arts, sciences, and technologies in the Arabic-Islamic world and beyond (Vol. 45). Köln, Germany: Walther König.Google Scholar
  29. Marks, L. U. (2011). Calligraphic animation: Documenting the invisible. Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(3), 307–323.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1746847711417930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matrtin, B., & Ringham, F. (2000). Dictionary of semiotics. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  31. McDevitt, J. (2015). In A. Gallery (Ed.), Mohammad Bozorgi: Transcendental strokes. Dubai, UAE: Ayyam Gallery.Google Scholar
  32. Park, C. I., & Lee, H. E. (2013). Emotional expression and effective communication on kinetic typography. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and Its Applications, 7(12), 393–400.Google Scholar
  33. Safwat, N. F. (1996). The art of the pen: Calligraphy of the 14th to 20th centuries. London: Nour Foundation in association with Azimuth Editions and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. van Leeuwen, T., & Djonov, E. (2015). Notes towards a semiotics of kinetic typography. Social Semiotics, 25(2), 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wells, P. (1998). Understanding animation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Wilkinson, C. K. (1973). Nishapur: Pottery of the early Islamic period. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Volda University CollegeVoldaNorway

Personalised recommendations