Advertisement

Magnetic-Based Photocatalyst for Antibacterial Application and Catalytic Performance

  • Sze-Mun LamEmail author
  • Jin-Chung Sin
  • Abdul Rahman Mohamed
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 30)

Abstract

Photocatalysis using magnetic-based photocatalyst in water and wastewater treatment offers a green and effective technique for the disinfection of harmful microorganisms along with its unwanted chemical pollutants. Introduction of magnetic materials to the catalytic material composites allows for the convenient magnetic separation, hence providing more economical, effective and environmentally friendly water decontamination processes. In this work, we disclosed a brief review on the effect of various magnetic-based photocatalyst nanomaterials on the application of the photocatalytic disinfection and degradation processes. The influencing factors including photocatalyst concentration and light intensity, nature of microorganism, solution pH, initial bacterial concentration and physiological state of bacteria of such processes were presented along with the disinfection mechanisms. The mechanism of magnetic-based photocatalyst was mainly ascribed to the surface generation of reactive oxygen species as well as free metal ion formation. Additionally, the potential utilization of the magnetic-based photocatalyst as visible light nanomaterials was discussed, and their magnetic recoveries were reviewed. It was worth noting that the combined disinfection and decontamination processes will greatly improve the use of magnetic-based photocatalysts as potential alternative to conventional methods of water purification.

Keywords

Magnetic Photocatalyst Nanomaterial Antibacterial Organic pollutant Photocatalysis Visible light Mechanism Recycling Wastewater treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman (UTARRF/2018–C2/S02 and UTARRF/2018–C1/L02) and Ministry of Higher Education of Malaysia (FRGS/1/2016/TK02/UTAR/02/1).

References

  1. Adán C, Marugán J, Mesones S, Casado C, van Grieken R (2017) Bacterial inactivation and degradation of organic molecules by titanium dioxide supported on porous stainless steel photocatalytic membranes. Chem Eng J 318:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.04.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alhaji MH, Sanaullah K, Lim SF, Khan A, Hipolito CN, Abdullah MO (2016) Photocatalytic treatment technology for palm oil mill effluent (POME)–A review. Process Saf Environ Prot 102:673–686.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.05.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ao YH, Xu JJ, Fu DG, Shen XW, Yuan CW (2008) A novel magnetically separable composite photocatalyst: titania-coated magnetic activated carbon. Sep Purif Technol 61:436–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishnoi S, Kumar A, Selvaraj R (2018) Facile synthesis of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles using inedible Cynometra ramiflora fruit extract waste and their photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye. Mater Res Bull 97:121–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.08.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bokare A, Singh H, Pai M, Nair R, Sabharwal S, Athawale AA (2014) Hydrothermal synthesis of Ag@TiO2–Fe3O4 nanocomposites using sonochemically activated precursors: magnetic, photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. Mater Res Express 1:046111.  https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/1/4/046111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busca G, Berardinelli S, Resini C, Arrighi L (2008) Technologies for the removal of phenol from fluid streams: a short review of recent developments. J Hazard Mater 160:265–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carp O, Huisman CL, Reller A (2004) Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide. Prog Solid State Chem 32:33–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chanhom P, Charoenla N, Tomapatanaget PB, Insin N (2017) Colloidal titania-silica-iron oxide nanocomposites and the effect from silica thickness on the photocatalytic and bactericidal activities. J Magn Magn Mater 427:54–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.10.123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Child M, Strike P, Pickup R, Edwards C (2002) Salmonella typhimurium displays cyclical patterns of sensitivity to UV-C killing during prolonged incubation in the stationary phase of growth. FEMS Microbiol Lett 213:81–85.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11289.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cui B, Peng HX, Xia HQ, Guo XH, Guo HL (2013) Magnetically recoverable core–shell nanocomposites γ-Fe2O3@SiO2@TiO2–Ag with enhanced photocatalytic activity and antibacterial activity. Sep Purif Technol 103:251–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2012.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eswar NKR, Singh SA, Madras G (2018) Photoconductive network structured copper oxide for simultaneous photoelectrocatalytic degradation of antibiotic (tetracycline) and bacteria (E. coli). Chem Eng J 332:757–774.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ganguly P, Byrne C, Breen A, Pillai SC (2018) Antimicrobial activity of photocatalysts: fundamentals, mechanisms, kinetics and recent advances. Appl Catal B Environ 225:51–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia-Segura S, Ocon JD, Chong MN (2018) Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents−a review. Process Saf Environ Prot 113:48–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaya IU, Abdullah AH (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over titanium dioxide: a review of fundamentals, progress and problems. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 9:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2007.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ge W, Encinas A, Araujo E, Song SX (2017) Magnetic matrices used in high gradient magnetic separation (HGMS): a review. Results Phys 7:4278–4286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez-Pastora J, Bringas E, Ortiz I (2014) Recent progress and future challenges on the use of high performance magnetic nano-adsorbents in environmental applications. Chem Eng J 256:187–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang SQ, Xu YG, Xie M, Liu QQ, Xu H, Zhao Y (2017) A Z-scheme magnetic recyclable Ag/AgBr@CoFe2O4 photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic performance for pollutant and bacterial elimination. RSC Adv 7:30845–30854.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA03936K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jesudoss SK, Vijaya JJ, Kennedy LJ, Rajana PI, Al-Lohedan HA, Ramalingam RJ, Bououdin M (2016) Studies on the efficient dual performance of Mn1–xNixFe2O4 spinel nanoparticles in photodegradation and antibacterial activity. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 165:121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jing LQ, Xu YG, Huang SQ, Xie M, He MQ, Xu H (2016) Novel magnetic CoFe2O4/Ag/Ag3VO4 composites: highly efficient visible light photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. Appl Catal B Environ 199:11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kadavy DR, Shaffer JJ, Lott SE, Wolf TA, Bolton TA, Gallimore WH (2000) Influence of infected cell growth state on bacteriophage reactivation levels. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5206–5012.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5206-5212.2000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kanchanatip E, Grisdanurak N, Yeh NC, Cheng TC (2014) Photocatalytic bactericidal efficiency of Ag doped TiO2/Fe3O4 on fish pathogens under visible light. Int J Photoenergy 2014:903612.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/903612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lam SM, Sin JC, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR (2012) Degradation of wastewaters containing organic dyes photocatalysed by zinc oxide: a review. Desalin Water Treat 41:131–169.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.664698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lam SM, Sin JC, Abdullah AZ, Mohamed AR (2014) Transition metal oxide loaded ZnO nanorods: preparation, characterization and their UV–vis photocatalytic activities. Sep Purif Technol 132:378–387.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.05.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lam SM, Sin JC, Mohamed AR (2017) A newly emerging visible light-responsive BiFeO3 perovskite for photocatalytic applications: a mini review. Mater Res Bull 90:15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.12.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lam SM, Quek JA, Sin JC (2018) Mechanistic investigation of visible light responsive Ag/ZnO micro/nanoflowers for enhanced photocatalytic performance and antibacterial activity. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 353:171–184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.11.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis CK, Burt-Maxcy R (1984) Effect of physiological age on radiation resistance of some bacteria that are highly resistant. Appl Environ Microbiol 47:915–918Google Scholar
  27. Li CY, Younesi R, Cai YL, Zhu YH, Ma MG, Zhu JF (2014) Photocatalytic and antibacterial properties of Au-decorated Fe3O4@mTiO2 core–shell microspheres. Appl Catal B Environ 156–157:314–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luo LQ, Nguyen AV (2017) A review of principles and applications of magnetic flocculation to separate ultrafine magnetic particles. Sep Purif Technol 172:85–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ma SL, Zhan SL, Jia YN, Zhou QX (2015) Superior antibacterial activity of Fe3O4-TiO2 nanosheets under solar light. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 7:21875–21883.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b06264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McEvoy JG, Zhang ZS (2014) Antimicrobial and photocatalytic disinfection mechanisms in silver-modified photocatalysts under dark and light conditions. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 19:62–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2014.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mousavi M, Habibi-Yangjeh A, Pouran SR (2018) Review on magnetically separable graphitic carbon nitride-based nanocomposites as promising visible-light-driven photocatalysts. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:1719–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-8166-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Murno PM, Flatatau GN, Clement LR, Gauthier ML (1995) Influence of Rpos (Katf) sigma factor on maintenance of viability and culturability of Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium in seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1853–1858Google Scholar
  33. Naeimi H, Nazifi ZS, Amininezhad SM (2015) Preparation of Fe3O4 encapsulated-silica sulfonic acid nanoparticles and study of their in vitro antimicrobial activity. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 149:180–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nasseh N, Taghavi L, Barikbin B, Nasseri MA (2018) Synthesis and characterizations of a novel FeNi3/SiO2/CuS magnetic nanocomposite for photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline in simulated wastewater. J Clean Prod 179:42–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Padhi DK, Panigrahi TK, Parid K, Singh SK, Mishra PM (2017) Green Synthesis of Fe3O4/RGO nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic performance for Cr(VI) reduction, phenol degradation, and antibacterial activity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:10551–10562.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02548 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pamme N (2006) Magnetism and microfluidics. Lab Chip 6:24–38.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B513005K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pang YL, Lim S, Ong HC, Chong WT (2016) Research progress on iron oxide-based magnetic materials: synthesis techniques and photocatalytic applications. Ceram Int 42:9–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pant B, Park M, Lee JH, Kim HY, Park SJ (2017) Novel magnetically separable silver-iron oxide nanoparticles decorated graphitic carbon nitride nano-sheets: a multifunctional photocatalyst via one-step hydrothermal process. J Colloid Interface Sci 496:343–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Qi KZ, Cheng B, Yu JG, Ho WK (2017) Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J Alloys Compd 727:792–820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rajeshwar K, Osugi ME, Chanmanee W, Chenthamarakshan CR, Zanoni MVB, Kajitvichyanukul P (2008) Heterogeneous photocatalytic treatment of organic dyes in air and aqueous media. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem Rev 9:171–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2008.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramezanalizadeh H, Manteghi F (2017) Design and development of a novel BiFeO3/CuWO4 heterojunction with enhanced photocatalytic performance for the degradation of organic dyes. J Photochem Photobio A: Chem 338:60–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reddy PVL, Kavitha B, Reddy PAK, Kim KH (2017) TiO2-based photocatalytic disinfection of microbes in aqueous media: a review. Environ Res 154:296–303.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.01.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shang K, Sun B, Sun JC, Li J, Ai SY (2013) Poly-(3-thiopheneacetic acid) coated Fe3O4@LDHs magnetic nanospheres as a photocatalyst for the efficient photocatalytic disinfection of pathogenic bacteria under solar light irradiation. New J Chem 37:2509–2514.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NJ00148B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shen JH, Ma G, Zhang JM, Quan WL, Li LC (2015) Facile fabrication of magnetic reduced graphene oxide-ZnFe2O4 composites with enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic activity. Appl Surf Sci 359:455–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sin JC, Lam SM, Mohamed AR, Lee KT (2012) Degrading endocrine disrupting chemicals from wastewater by TiO2 photocatalysis: a review. Int J Photoenergy 2012:185159.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/185159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A, Kaus NHM, Ann LC, Bakhori SKM, Hasan H, Mohamad D (2015) Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles: antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett 7:219–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-015-0040-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sun L, Du T, Hu C, Chen J, Lu J, Lu ZC (2017) Antibacterial activity of graphene oxide/g-C3N4 composites through photocatalytic disinfection under visible light. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8693–8701.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01431 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tong T, Zhang H, Chen JG, Jin DR, Cheng JR (2016) The photocatalysis of BiFeO3 disks under visible light irradiation. Catal Commun 87:23–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.08.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vortmann M, Balsari S, Holman SR, Greenough PG (2015) Water, sanitation, and hygiene at the world’s largest mass gathering. Curr Infect Dis Rep 17:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-015-0461-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang GM, Feng HQ, Gao A, Hao Q, Jin WH, Peng X, Li W, Wu GS, Chu PK (2016) Extracellular electron transfer from aerobic bacteria to Au-loaded TiO2 semiconductor without Light: a new bacteria-killing mechanism other than localized surface plasmon resonance or microbial fuel cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:24509–24516.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Xia DH, Liu HD, Jiang ZF, Ng TW, Lai WS, An TC, Wang WJ, Wong PK (2018) Visible-light-driven photocatalytic inactivation of Escherichia coli K-12 over thermal treated natural magnetic sphalerite: band structure analysis and toxicity evaluation. Appl Catal B Environ 224:541–552.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Xu YG, Huang SQ, Xie M, Li YP, Jing LQ, Xu H (2013) Core-shell magnetic Ag/AgCl@Fe2O3 photocatalyst with enhanced photoactivity in eliminating the bisphenol A and microbial contamination. New J Chem 40:3413–3422.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NJ02898A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Xu JW, Gao ZD, Han K, Liu YM, Song YY (2014) Synthesis of magnetically separable Ag3PO4/TiO2/Fe3O4 heterostructure with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light for photoinactivation of bacteria. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:15122–15131.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am5032727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang WX, Ding LH, Luo JQ, Jaffrin MY, Tang B (2016) Membrane fouling in photocatalytic membrane reactors (PMRs) for water and wastewater treatment: a critical review. Chem Eng J 302:446–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang J, Dong SS, Zhang XY, Zhu SY, Zhou DD, Crittenden JC (2018) Photocatalytic removal organic matter and bacteria simultaneously from real WWTP effluent with power generation concomitantly: using an Er-Al-ZnO photoanode. Sep Purif Technol 191:101–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2017.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sze-Mun Lam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jin-Chung Sin
    • 2
  • Abdul Rahman Mohamed
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Green TechnologyUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanKamparMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Petrochemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Green TechnologyUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanKamparMalaysia
  3. 3.School of Chemical EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalayisiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations