Advertisement

Biomass-Based Photocatalysts for Environmental Applications

  • Yean Ling PangEmail author
  • Chin Woei Lim
  • Katrina Pui Yee Shak
  • Steven Lim
  • Wai Chong Cheam
  • Chai Hoon Koo
  • Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Chemistry for a Sustainable World book series (ECSW, volume 30)

Abstract

In recent years, advanced oxidation process has shown a new frontier environmental friendly and sustainable wastewater treatment technology to replace the conventional treatment methods. Heterogeneous photocatalysis is a promising approach in environmental remediation. Among the popular photocatalysts, semiconductor oxide photocatalysts have been widely explored due to their durability and chemical and physical properties. However, the practical application of semiconductor oxide is limited because of its expensive cost, large bandgap energy and rapid recombination of the photoinduced electron-hole pairs. This chapter addresses the main advancements in overcoming the barriers accompanied by pure semiconductor oxide by incorporating with biomass-derived carbonaceous materials for fabrication of effective visible light-responsive semiconductor oxide-based photocatalysts.

The utilization of these biomass-derived photocatalysts provides a greener synthesis route for environmental purifications. This chapter firstly highlights the types, properties and conversion of biomass into biochar, activated carbon (AC) or any other carbonaceous materials. The general methods for preparing biomass-based support and the mechanisms are also presented in details. Finally, the latest research papers on modification or functionalization of a biomass-based photocatalyst for the removal of organic pollutants have also been comprehensively discussed. There is still a lack of published information on the fundamental knowledge of biomass-derived photocatalyst to understand the complex photocatalytic mechanisms especially on the reactions occurring on the heterogeneous biomass surfaces. Therefore, further theories and hypotheses need to be investigated to fill these gaps in order to address all full potentials of the biomass-derived photocatalyst for environmental applications.

Keywords

Biomass Activated carbon (AC) Biochar Photocatalyst Modification Functionalization Heterogeneous Advanced oxidation process Photocatalytic degradation Organic pollutants 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia, for the financial support under UTARRF (IPSR/RMC/UTARRF/2018-C1/P01) through Centre for Photonics and Advanced Materials Research and Centre for Environment and Green Technology (CEGT). The financial support provided by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2018/TK10/UTAR/02/2) by the Ministry of Education (MOE), Malaysia, is also gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Ahmad M, Rajapaksha AU, Lim JE, Zhang M, Bolan N, Mohan D, Vithanage M, Lee SS, Ok YS (2014) Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere 99:19–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadpour A, Do DD (1996) The preparation of active carbons from coal by chemical and physical activation. Carbon 34(4):471–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00204-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alabadi A, Abbood HA, Li Q, Jing N, Tan B (2016) Imine-linked polymer based nitrogen-doped porous activated carbon for efficient and selective CO2 capture. Sci Rep 6:38614.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ao CH, Lee SC (2005) Indoor air purification by photocatalyst TiO2 immobilized on an activated carbon filter installed in an air cleaner. Chem Eng Sci 60(1):103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.01.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azami M, Haghighi M, Allahyari S (2018) Sono-precipitation of Ag2CrO4 -C composite enhanced by carbon-based materials (AC, GO, CNT and C3N4) and its activity in photocatalytic degradation of acid orange 7 in water. Ultrason Sonochem 40:505–516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.07.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagheri S, Muhd Julkapli N, Bee Abd Hamid S (2015) Functionalized activated carbon derived from biomass for photocatalysis applications perspective. Int J Photoenergy 2015:30.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/218743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergius F (1928) Beiträge zur Theorie der Kohleentstehung. Naturwissenschaften 1(16):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bora LV, Mewada RK (2017) Visible/solar light active photocatalysts for organic effluent treatment: fundamentals, mechanisms and parametric review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 76:1393–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrappa K, Subramani AK, Ananda S, Rai KML, Sunitha MH, Basavalingu B, Soga K (2006) Impregnation of ZnO onto activated carbon under hydrothermal conditions and its photocatalytic properties. J Mater Sci 41(5):1355–1362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-7341-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao X, Ro KS, Libra JA, Kammann CI, Lima I, Berge N, Li A, Li Y, Chen N, Yang J, Deng B, Mao J (2013) Effects of biomass types and carbonization conditions on the chemical characteristics of hydrochars. J Agric Food Chem 61(39):9401–9411.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402345k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caturla F, Molina-Sabio M, Rodríguez-Reinoso F (1991) Preparation of activated carbon by chemical activation with ZnCl2. Carbon 29(7):999–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(91)90179-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cha JS, Park SH, Jung SC, Ryu C, Jeon JK, Shin MC, Park YK (2016) Production and utilization of biochar: a review. J Ind Eng Chem 40:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chekin F, Bagheri S, Abd Hamid SB (2013) Synthesis of Pt doped TiO2 nanoparticles: characterization and application for electrocatalytic oxidation of l-methionine. Sensors Actuators B Chem 177(Complete):898–903.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2012.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen Z, Li K, Pu L (2014) The performance of phosphorus (P)-doped activated carbon as a catalyst in air-cathode microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 170:379–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.114 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen X, Liu D, Wu Z, Cravotto G, Wu Z, B-c Y (2017a) Microwave-assisted rapid synthesis of ag-β-cyclodextrin/TiO2/AC with exposed {001} facets for highly efficient naphthalene degradation under visible light. Catal Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2017.10.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen Y, Zhang X, Chen W, Yang H, Chen H (2017b) The structure evolution of biochar from biomass pyrolysis and its correlation with gas pollutant adsorption performance. Bioresour Technol 246(May):101–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng BH, Zeng RJ, Jiang H (2017) Recent developments of post-modification of biochar for electrochemical energy storage. Bioresour Technol 246:224–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colmenares JC, Varma RS, Lisowski P (2016) Sustainable hybrid photocatalysts: titania immobilized on carbon materials derived from renewable and biodegradable resources. Green Chem 18(21):5736–5750.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC02477G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deng J, Li M, Wang Y (2016) Biomass-derived carbon: synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Green Chem 18(18):4824–4854.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6GC01172A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dhyani V, Bhaskar T (2017) A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Renew Energy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dong SS, Zhang JB, Gao LL, Wang YL, Zhou DD (2012) Preparation of spherical activated carbon-supported and Er3+:YAlO3-doped TiO2 photocatalyst for methyl orange degradation under visible light. Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China (English Edition) 22(10):2477–2483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(11)61488-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. El-Hendawy A-NA (2003) Influence of HNO3 oxidation on the structure and adsorptive properties of corncob-based activated carbon. Carbon 41(4):713–722.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00029-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. El-Salamony RA, Amdeha E, Ghoneim SA, Badawy NA, Salem KM, Al-Sabagh AM (2017) Titania modified activated carbon prepared from sugarcane bagasse: adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under visible light irradiation. Environ Technol 0(0):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2017.1290148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. El-Sheikh AH, Newman AP, Al-Daffaee H, Phull S, Cresswell N, York S (2004) Deposition of anatase on the surface of activated carbon. Surf Coat Technol 187(2):284–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. El-Sheikh SM, Khedr TM, Hakki A, Ismail AA, Badawy WA, Bahnemann DW (2017) Visible light activated carbon and nitrogen co-doped mesoporous TiO2 as efficient photocatalyst for degradation of ibuprofen. Sep Purif Technol 173:258–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2016.09.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ergun S (1956) Kinetics of the reaction of carbon with carbon dioxide. J Phys Chem 60(4):480–485.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j150538a022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feng W, Kwon S, Feng X, Borguet E, Vidic RD (2006) Sulfur impregnation on activated carbon fibers through H2S oxidation for vapor phase mercury removal. J Environ Eng 132(3):292–300.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:3(292) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Figueiredo JL, Pereira MFR, Freitas MMA, Órfão JJM (1999) Modification of the surface chemistry of activated carbons. Carbon 37(9):1379–1389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00333-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fu X, Yang H, Lu G, Tu Y, Wu J (2015) Improved performance of surface functionalized TiO2/activated carbon for adsorption–photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in aqueous solution. Mater Sci Semicond Process 39(Complete):362–370.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2015.05.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González PG, Pliego-Cuervo YB (2014) Adsorption of Cd(II), Hg(II) and Zn(II) from aqueous solution using mesoporous activated carbon produced from Bambusa vulgaris striata. Chem Eng Res Des 92(11):2715–2724.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2014.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. González-García P (2015) Surface oxygen functionalities and microstructure of activated carbons derived from lignocellulosic resources. In: Thakur VK, Thakur MK (eds) Chemical functionalization of carbon nanomaterials: chemistry and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 1077Google Scholar
  32. Gulyas H, Argáez ÁSO, Kong F, Jorge CL, Eggers S, Otterpohl R (2013) Combining activated carbon adsorption with heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation: lack of synergy for biologically treated greywater and tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether. Environ Technol 34(11):1393–1403.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.751129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Guo Y, Yang S, Yu K, Zhao J, Wang Z, Xu H (2002) The preparation and mechanism studies of rice husk based porous carbon. Mater Chem Phys 74(3):320–323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(01)00473-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta RK, Dubey M, Kharel P, Gu Z, Fan QH (2015) Biochar activated by oxygen plasma for supercapacitors. J Power Sources 274:1300–1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hasegawa G, Deguchi T, Kanamori K, Kobayashi Y, Kageyama H, Abe T, Nakanishi K (2015) High-level doping of nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur into activated carbon monoliths and their electrochemical capacitances. Chem Mater 27(13):4703–4712.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heidari A, Younesi H, Rashidi A, Ghoreyshi AA (2014) Evaluation of CO2 adsorption with eucalyptus wood based activated carbon modified by ammonia solution through heat treatment. Chem Eng J 254:503–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoffmann MR, Martin ST, Choi W, Bahnemann DW (1995) Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis. Chem Rev 95(1):69–96.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hu B, Wang K, Wu L, Yu SH, Antonietti M, Titirici MM (2010) Engineering carbon materials from the hydrothermal carbonization process of biomass. Adv Mater 22(7):813–828.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hu Z, Xu T, Fang B (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of vehicle exhaust using Fe-doped TiO2 loaded on activated carbon. Appl Surf Sci 420:34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.05.091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang Y, Ma E, Zhao G (2015) Thermal and structure analysis on reaction mechanisms during the preparation of activated carbon fibers by KOH activation from liquefied wood-based fibers. Ind Crop Prod 69:447–455.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huang H-B, Wang Y, Cai F-Y, Jiao W-B, Zhang N, Liu C, Cao H-L, Lü J (2017) Photodegradation of rhodamine B over biomass-derived activated carbon supported CdS nanomaterials under visible irradiation. Front Chem 5:123.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2017.00123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hulicova-Jurcakova D, Seredych M, Lu GQ, Kodiweera N, Stallworth PE, Greenbaum S, Bandosz TJ (2009) Effect of surface phosphorus functionalities of activated carbons containing oxygen and nitrogen on electrochemical capacitance. Carbon 47(6):1576–1584.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Islam MA, Ahmed MJ, Khanday WA, Asif M, Hameed BH (2017) Mesoporous activated carbon prepared from NaOH activation of rattan (Lacosperma secundiflorum) hydrochar for methylene blue removal. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 138(August 2016):279–285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jain A, Balasubramanian R, Srinivasan MP (2016) Hydrothermal conversion of biomass waste to activated carbon with high porosity: a review. Chem Eng J 283:789–805.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jayaraman T, Murthy AP, Elakkiya V, Chandrasekaran S, Nithyadharseni P, Khan Z, Senthil RA, Shanker R, Raghavender M, Kuppusami P, Jagannathan M, Ashokkumar M (2018) Recent development on carbon based heterostructures for their applications in energy and environment: a review. J Ind Eng Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Joshi KM, Shrivastava VS (2011) Degradation of Alizarine red-S (a textiles dye) by photocatalysis using ZnO and TiO2 as photocatalyst. Int J Environ Sci 2(1):8–21Google Scholar
  47. Kah M, Sigmund G, Xiao F, Hofmann T (2017) Sorption of ionizable and ionic organic compounds to biochar, activated carbon and other carbonaceous materials. Water Res 124:673–692.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.07.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khalid NR, Majid A, Tahir MB, Niaz NA, Khalid S (2017) Carbonaceous-TiO2 nanomaterials for photocatalytic degradation of pollutants: a review. Ceram Int 43(17):14552–14571.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee J, Kim KH, Kwon EE (2017) Biochar as a catalyst. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77(August 2016):70–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leong KH, Aziz AA, Kang YL, Goh SW, Singh KV, Sim LC, Saravanan P (2017) Synergized mechanistic and solar photocatalysis features of N-TiO2 functionalised activated carbon. AIMS Mater Sci 4(3):800–813.  https://doi.org/10.3934/matersci.2017.3.800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Li Y, Li J, Ma M, Ouyang Y, Yan W (2009) Preparation of TiO2/activated carbon with Fe ions doping photocatalyst and its application to photocatalytic degradation of reactive brilliant red K2G. Sci China Ser B Chem 52(8):1113–1119.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-009-0169-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Li L, Liu S, Liu J (2011) Surface modification of coconut shell based activated carbon for the improvement of hydrophobic VOC removal. J Hazard Mater 192(2):683–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Li J, Dai J, Liu G, Zhang H, Gao Z, Fu J, He Y, Huang Y (2016) Biochar from microwave pyrolysis of biomass: a review. Biomass Bioenergy 94:228–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Li B, Zhang H, Wang D, Lv H, Zhang C (2017a) Agricultural waste-derived activated carbon for high performance lithium-ion capacitors. RSC Adv 7(60):37923–37928.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA06680E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Li J, Ng DHL, Kwong FL, Chiu KL (2017b) Hierarchically porous TiO2-MnTiO3/hollow activated carbon fibers heterojunction photocatalysts with synergistic adsorption-photocatalytic performance under visible light. J Porous Mater 24(4):1047–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-016-0345-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lin X, Rong F, Ji X, Fu D (2011) Carbon-doped mesoporous TiO2 film and its photocatalytic activity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 142(1):276–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.12.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lin L, Jiang W, Xu P (2017) Comparative study on pharmaceuticals adsorption in reclaimed water desalination concentrate using biochar: impact of salts and organic matter. Sci Total Environ 601-602:857–864.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lv K, Zhang H, Chen S (2018) Nitrogen and phosphorus co-doped carbon modified activated carbon as an efficient oxygen reduction catalyst for microbial fuel cells. RSC Adv 8(2):848–855.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA12907F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mahmoodi NM, Arami M, Zhang J (2011) Preparation and photocatalytic activity of immobilized composite photocatalyst (titania nanoparticle/activated carbon). J Alloys Compd 509(14):4754–4764.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Malathi A, Madhavan J, Ashokkumar M, Arunachalam P (2018) A review on BiVO4 photocatalyst: activity enhancement methods for solar photocatalytic applications. Appl Catal A Gen 555:47–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2018.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Manoj KR, Silvana A, Hanming D (2011) Photocatalytic inactivation: air-water. Nanotechnology for environmental decontamination. McGraw Hill Professional, Access EngineeringGoogle Scholar
  62. Marsh H, Rodríguez-Reinoso F (2006) Chapter 4 - characterization of activated carbon. In: Activated carbon. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, pp 143–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044463-5/50018-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Marsh H, Yan DS, O'Grady TM, Wennerberg A (1984) Formation of active carbons from cokes using potassium hydroxide. Carbon 22(6):603–611.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(84)90096-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mehrvarz E, Ghoreyshi AA, Jahanshahi M (2017) Adsorptive separation of CO2 and CH4 by the broom sorghum based activated carbon functionalized by diethanolamine. Korean J Chem Eng 34(2):413–424.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-016-0268-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mohamed AR, Mohammadi M, Darzi GN (2010) Preparation of carbon molecular sieve from lignocellulosic biomass: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(6):1591–1599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mohammad EJ, Lafta A, Alkaim A, Kahdem SH (2016) Enhancement the photocatalytic activity of zinc oxide surface by combination with functionalized and non-functionalized activated carbon. Int J ChemTech Res 9(12):656Google Scholar
  67. Mohan D, Sarswat A, Ok YS, Pittman CU (2014) Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent - a critical review. Bioresour Technol 160:191–202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Molina-Sabio M, González MT, Rodriguez-Reinoso F, Sepúlveda-Escribano A (1996) Effect of steam and carbon dioxide activation in the micropore size distribution of activated carbon. Carbon 34(4):505–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(96)00006-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Muthirulan P, Meenakshisundararam M, Kannan N (2013) Beneficial role of ZnO photocatalyst supported with porous activated carbon for the mineralization of alizarin cyanin green dye in aqueous solution. J Adv Res 4(6):479–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2012.08.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nekouei S, Nekouei F, Kargarzadeh H (2018) Synthesis of ZnO photocatalyst modified with activated carbon for a perfect degradation of ciprofloxacin and its secondary pollutants. Appl Organomet Chem 32(3):e4198.  https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.4198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Njoku VO, Foo KY, Asif M, Hameed BH (2014) Preparation of activated carbons from rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum) peel by microwave-induced KOH activation for acid yellow 17 dye adsorption. Chem Eng J 250:198–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Nozawa M, Tanigawa K, Hosomi M, Chikusa T, Kawada E (2001) Removal and decomposition of malodorants by using titanium dioxide photocatalyst supported on fiber activated carbon. Water Sci Technol 44(9):127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Omri A, Benzina M, Ammar N (2013) Preparation, modification and industrial application of activated carbon from almond shell. J Ind Eng Chem 19(6):2092–2099.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pawar RC, Lee CS (2015) Chapter 1 - basics of photocatalysis. In: Heterogeneous nanocomposite-photocatalysis for water purification. William Andrew Publishing, Boston, pp 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-39310-2.00001-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Perera SD, Mariano RG, Vu K, Nour N, Seitz O, Chabal Y, Balkus KJ (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene-TiO2 nanotube composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity. ACS Catal 2(6):949–956.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cs200621c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Qi K, Cheng B, Yu J, Ho W (2017) Review on the improvement of the photocatalytic and antibacterial activities of ZnO. J Alloys Compd 727:792–820.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.08.142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rajapaksha AU, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Zhang M, Vithanage M, Mandal S, Gao B, Bolan NS, Ok YS (2016) Engineered/designer biochar for contaminant removal/immobilization from soil and water: potential and implication of biochar modification. Chemosphere 148:276–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.01.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Reif AE (1952) The mechanism of the carbon dioxide–carbon reaction. J Phys Chem 56(6):785–788.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j150498a033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rodríguez-Estupiñán P, Erto A, Giraldo L, Moreno-Piraján CJ (2017) Adsorption of Cd (II) on modified granular activated carbons: isotherm and column study. Molecules 22(12).  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22122280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roonasi P, Mazinani M (2017) Synthesis and application of barium ferrite/activated carbon composite as an effective solar photocatalyst for discoloration of organic dye contaminants in wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 5(4):3822–3827.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Salem NA, Ebrahim Yakoot SM (2016) Adsorption kinetic and mechanism studies of thorium on nitric acid oxidized activated carbon. Desalin Water Treat 57(58):28313–28322.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.1184592 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Shaarani FW, Hameed BH (2011) Ammonia-modified activated carbon for the adsorption of 2,4-dichlorophenol. Chem Eng J 169(1):180–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Smits M, Huygh D, Craeye B, Lenaerts S (2014) Effect of process parameters on the photocatalytic soot degradation on self-cleaning cementitious materials. Catal Today 230:250–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stavropoulos GG, Samaras P, Sakellaropoulos GP (2008) Effect of activated carbons modification on porosity, surface structure and phenol adsorption. J Hazard Mater 151(2):414–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Su EC, Huang BS, Liu CC, Wey MY (2015) Photocatalytic conversion of simulated EDTA wastewater to hydrogen by pH-resistant Pt/TiO2-activated carbon photocatalysts. Renew Energy 75:266–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sweetman JM, May S, Mebberson N, Pendleton P, Vasilev K, Plush ES, Hayball DJ (2017) Activated carbon, carbon nanotubes and graphene: materials and composites for advanced water purification. J Carbon Res 3(2):18.  https://doi.org/10.3390/c3020018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Szczepanik B (2017) Photocatalytic degradation of organic contaminants over clay-TiO2 nanocomposites: a review. Appl Clay Sci 141:227–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2017.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tan X, Liu S-b, Liu Y-g, Gu Y-l, Zeng G-m, Hu X-j, Wang X, Liu S-h, Jiang L-h (2017) Biochar as potential sustainable precursors for activated carbon production: multiple applications in environmental protection and energy storage. Bioresour Technol 227:359–372.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.083 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Thines KR, Abdullah EC, Mubarak NM, Ruthiraan M (2017) Synthesis of magnetic biochar from agricultural waste biomass to enhancing route for waste water and polymer application: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 67:257–276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Titirici M-M, Funke A, Kruse A (2015) Chapter 12 hydrothermal carbonization of biomass. In: Pandey A, Bhaskar T, Stöcker M, Sukumaran R (eds) Recent advances in Thermo-chemical conversion of biomass, pp 325–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63289-0.00012-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tran HN, You SJ, Chao HP (2017) Fast and efficient adsorption of methylene green 5 on activated carbon prepared from new chemical activation method. J Environ Manag 188(2017):322–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tripathi M, Sahu JN, Ganesan P (2016) Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:467–481.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Trofymenko SI, Sych NV, Poddubnaya OI, Gawdzik B, Sobiesiak M, PodkoŚcielna B, Tsyba MM, Puziy AM (2015) Microwave-assisted phosphoric acid activation of corncob for preparation of functionalized activated carbon. Ukrainian-Polish Symposia on Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Interfacial Phenomena and their Technological Applications, September 2016, Lviv, UkraineGoogle Scholar
  94. Urbaniec K, Bakker RR (2015) Biomass residues as raw material for dark hydrogen fermentation - a review. Int J Hydrog Energy 40(9):3648–3658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Uyguner-Demirel CS, Birben NC, Bekbolet M (2017) Elucidation of background organic matter matrix effect on photocatalytic treatment of contaminants using TiO2: a review. Catal Today 284:202–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2016.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Velasco LF, Fonseca IM, Parra JB, Lima JC, Ania CO (2012) Photochemical behaviour of activated carbons under UV irradiation. Carbon 50(1):249–258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.08.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vinayagam M, Ramachandran S, Ramya V, Sivasamy A (2016) Photocatalytic degradation of orange G dye using ZnO/biomass activated carbon nanocomposite. J Environ Chem Eng 6(3):3726–3734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Viswanathan B, Neel P, Varadarajan T (2009) Methods of activation and specific applications of carbon materials. Methods of Activation and Specific Applications of Carbon Materials:160-160Google Scholar
  99. Wang H, Yang X, Zi J, Zhou M, Ye Z, Li J, Guan Q, Lv P, Huo P, Yan Y (2016a) High photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline under visible light with Ag/AgCl/activated carbon composite plasmonic photocatalyst. J Ind Eng Chem 35:83–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2015.12.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wang R, Yang R, Wang B, Gao W (2016b) Efficient degradation of methylene blue by the Nano TiO2-functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite photocatalyst for wastewater treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut 227(1).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2720-z
  101. Wang M, Fan X, Zhang L, Liu J, Wang B, Cheng R, Li M, Tian J, Shi J (2017a) Probing the role of O-containing groups in CO2 adsorption of N-doped porous activated carbon. Nanoscale 9(44):17593–17600.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR05977A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wang S, Dai G, Yang H, Luo Z (2017b) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-the-art review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 62:33–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Xiang Q, Yu J, Jaroniec M (2012) Graphene-based semiconductor photocatalysts. Chem Soc Rev 41(2):782–796.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15172J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Xiong X, Yu IKM, Cao L, Tsang DCW, Zhang S, Ok YS (2017) A review of biochar-based catalysts for chemical synthesis, biofuel production, and pollution control. Bioresour Technol 246:254–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Xue G, Liu H, Chen Q, Hills C, Tyrer M, Innocent F (2011) Synergy between surface adsorption and photocatalysis during degradation of humic acid on TiO2/activated carbon composites. J Hazard Mater 186(1):765–772.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yao S, Zhang J, Shen D, Xiao R, Gu S, Zhao M, Liang J (2016) Removal of Pb(II) from water by the activated carbon modified by nitric acid under microwave heating. J Colloid Interface Sci 463:118–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2015.10.047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. You S, Ok YS, Chen SS, Tsang DCW, Kwon EE, Lee J, Wang CH (2017) A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: energy and environmental applications. Bioresour Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Yu KL, Lau BF, Show PL, Ong HC, Ling TC, Chen WH, Ng EP, Chang JS (2017) Recent developments on algal biochar production and characterization. Bioresour. Technol. 246:2–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Yuan Y, Bolan N, Prévoteau A, Vithanage M, Biswas JK, Ok YS, Wang H (2017) Applications of biochar in redox-mediated reactions. Bioresour Technol 246:271–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.154 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Yue Z, Economy J (2017) 4 - carbonization and activation for production of activated carbon fibers A2 - Chen, Jonathan Y. In: Activated carbon Fiber and textiles. Woodhead Publishing, Oxford, pp 61–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100660-3.00004-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zawawi A, Ramli MR, Yub Harun N (2017) Photodegradation of 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride [Bmim]Cl via synergistic effect of adsorption–photodegradation of Fe-TiO2/AC. Technologies 5(4):82.  https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies5040082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zhang X, Gao B, Creamer AE, Cao C, Li Y (2017) Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: a review. J Hazard Mater 338:102–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.05.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zhi Y, Liu J (2016) Surface modification of activated carbon for enhanced adsorption of perfluoroalkyl acids from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 144:1224–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yean Ling Pang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chin Woei Lim
    • 1
  • Katrina Pui Yee Shak
    • 1
  • Steven Lim
    • 1
  • Wai Chong Cheam
    • 1
  • Chai Hoon Koo
    • 2
  • Ahmad Zuhairi Abdullah
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and ScienceUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanKajangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and ScienceUniversiti Tunku Abdul RahmanKajangMalaysia
  3. 3.School of Chemical EngineeringUniversiti Sains MalaysiaNibong TebalMalaysia

Personalised recommendations