An Insider’s View: Launching a University Program

  • Kay IrieEmail author
Part of the New Language Learning and Teaching Environments book series (NLLTE)


Any new program requires a great deal of resources to realize innovations that fit the government’s guidelines and to co-exist with traditions that built the basis for the innovation. However, this process has been hardly recognized. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an insider’s account on the process of developing the new interdisciplinary degree program of social science to offer the curriculum partially taught in English at a private university. By elucidating the complexities of Japanese education system and the contextual factors, the author aims to help readers, especially practicing teachers, to understand some of the restrictions they might have faced in their own attempts to innovate or the restrictions they cannot be aware of until they have been involved in the actual process.


Interdisciplinary degree program EMI CLIL Resistance to innovation MEXT Global jinzai 


  1. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  2. Bradford, A. (2016). Toward a typology of implementation challenges facing English-medium instruction in higher education: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(4), 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford, A., & Brown, H. (2018). Road-mapping English medium instruction in Japan. In A. Bradford & H. Brown (Eds.), English-medium instruction in Japanese higher education: Policy, challenges and outcomes (pp. 3–13). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, A. (2011). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, UK: Longman Applied Linguistics/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  5. Dafouz, E., & Smit, U. (2014). Towards a dynamic conceptual framework for English-medium education in multilingual university settings. Applied Linguistics, 37(3), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hashimoto, H. (2018). Government policy driving English-medium instruction at Japanese universities: Responding to a competitiveness crisis in a globalizing world. In A. Bradford & H. Brown (Eds.), English-medium instruction in Japanese higher education: Policy, challenges and outcomes (pp. 14–31). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2016). CLIL experiences in secondary and tertiary education. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Locastro, V. (1996). English language education in Japan. In H. Coleman (Ed.), Society and the language classroom (pp. 40–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Marsh, D., & Wolff, D. (2007). Diverse contexts—Converging goals CLIL in Europe. Frankfurt: Peter Lang AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MEXT. (2009). Quality assurance framework of higher education in Japan. Retrieved from
  12. MEXT. (2016). Heisei nijyu-hachinendo gakko kihon chosa kakuteichi no kohyo ni tsuite [Regarding the report on school basic survey 2016]. Retrieved from
  13. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. (2015). Joho Tsuhin hakusho heisei 27nendoban [White paper information and communications in Japan year 2015]. Retrieved from
  14. Murphy, R. T. (2014). Japan and the shackles of the past (What everyone needs to know). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Obunsha Kyoiku Joho Center. (2016, August). Shiritsu-dai nyugaku teiin ware: 27nen yori nanakozo no 257 daigaku, 44.5% ni akka [257 private universities facing the insufficient enrolment, 44.5% worsened by 7 schools from 2015]. Retrieved from
  16. Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, UK: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Tsuchiya, K., & Pérez Murillo, M. D. (2015). Comparing the language policies and the students’ perceptions of CLIL in tertiary education in Spain and Japan. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 8(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilkinson, R., & Walsh, M. (2014). Integrating content and language in higher education: From theory to practice: Selected papers from the 2013 ICLHE Conference. Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
  19. Yamamoto, N. (2017, April 28). Genkaidaigaku wa kieru! Shiritsudai teiinware no kozo: Sashisemaru 2018 mondai, sono chokuzen taisaku wa? [Borderline universities will disappear! The structure of private university insufficient enrolment: What measures to be taken for the fast approaching the 2018 issue]. Retrieved from
  20. Yoshida, A. (2014). Gurobaru jinzai no ikusei to nihon no daigaku kyoiku: giron no rokarizumu wo megutte [Development of global jinzai and Japanese university]. Educational Studies in Japan, 81(2), 164–175.Google Scholar
  21. Yoshijima, S., & Ohashi, R. (2004). Gaikokugo Kyouiku II -Gaikokugono gakushu, kyojyu, hyoka no tameno yo-roppa kyoutsu sanshowaku [Foreign Language Education II. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment]. Tokyo: Goethe-Institute Japan, Asahi Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Zhao, K., & Lei, C. (2017). Technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning in Chinese tertiary English classes: Potentials and challenges. In H. Reinders, D. Nunan, & B. Zou (Eds.), Innovation in language learning and teaching: The case of China (pp. 89–113). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of International Social SciencesGakushuin UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations