Advertisement

The Exchange Between Legislature and Courts: Examples of Strategic Behavior from the Polish Legal System

  • Izabela Skoczeń
Chapter
Part of the Law and Philosophy Library book series (LAPS, volume 127)

Abstract

In the previous chapters, I discussed some famous cases that appear often in the literature. Most of these cases are from common law systems. In order to demonstrate that the theory that I propose is generally applicable, I the present chapter I provide examples of pragmatic effects in the law in the Polish legal system (a continental system). I select examples from civil and criminal law and hope that this shows how the strategic framework proposed in the present book is a universal mechanism that is not restricted to any particular type of legal system.

References

  1. Asgeirsson H (2016) On the possibility of non-literal legislative speech. In: Capone A, Poggi F (eds) Pragmatics and law: philosophical perspectives. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Carston R (2013) Legal texts and canons of construction: a view from current pragmatic theory. In: Freeman MDA, Smith F (eds) Law and language, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Giezek JW, Kaczmarek T (2013) Przeciwko ustawowej regulacji kryteriów obiektywnego przypisania skutku [Against legal rules on criteria of the objective ascription of effect]. Państwo Prawo 5:79–92Google Scholar
  4. Goldsworthy J (1994) Implications in language, law and the constitution. In: Lindell G, Zines L (eds) Future directions in Australian constitutional law: essays in honour of Professor Leslie Zines. Federation Press in association with the Centre for International and Public Law and the Law Faculty, Australian National University, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  5. Małecki M (2013) Z problematyki obiektywnego przypisania skutku (przypadek płonącego anioła) [The problem of the objective ascription of effect (the case of the burning angel)]. Czasopismo Prawa Karnego i Nauk Penalnych XVIIGoogle Scholar
  6. Poggi F (2011) Law and conversational implicatures. Int J Semiotics Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 24:21–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9201-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Wróbel W, Zoll A (2010) Polskie prawo karne: część ogólna [Polish Criminal Law: general part]. Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak, KrakówGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Izabela Skoczeń
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Legal Theory and Jagiellonian Centre for Law, Language and PhilosophyJagiellonian UniversityKrakówPoland

Personalised recommendations