Physical examination is an important tool in diagnosing patellofemoral problems. Due to the variety of different pathologies which can be exhibited in the joint, a systematic approach is recommended. The authors recommend a stepwise examination, with the patient examined standing, sitting and supine; in each, both a static and dynamic examination is performed. Systematic examination and accurate documentation of findings aid the choice of further investigations and management strategies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Juul-Kristensen B, Rogind H, Jensen D. Inter examiner reproducibility of tests and criteria for generalized joint hypermobility and benign joint hypermobility syndrome. Rheumatology. 2007;46:1835–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papagelopoulos P, Sim F. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: diagnosis and management. Orthopaedics. 1997;20:148–57.Google Scholar
Lester J, Watson J, Hutchinson M. Physical examination of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Sports Med. 2014;33:403–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes G, Stapait E, Kirsten M, de Noronha M, Sanatos G. Clinical test for diagnosis of patellofemoral pain syndrome: systematic review with meta-analysis. Phys Ther Sport. 2013;14:54–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan F, Derasari A, Fine K, Brindle T, Alter K. Q angle and J sign: indicative of maltracking subgroups in patellofemoral pain. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:266–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolowich P, Paulos L, Rosenberg T. Lateral Release of the patella: indications and contraindications. Am J Sports Med. 1990;18:359–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodfellow J, Hungerford D, Woods C. Patellofemoral joint mechanics and pathology. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1979;58:291–9.Google Scholar
Sturgill L, Snyder-Mackler L, Manal T, Axe M. Interrater reliability of a clinical scale to assess knee joint effusion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009;39:845–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doberstein S, Romeyn R, Reineke D. The diagnostic value of Clarke sign in assessing chondromalacia patella. J Athl Train. 2008;43:190–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar