Advertisement

Image Gravity: Defining Spatial Constructs for Invisible Phenomena

  • Dana KarwasEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 69)

Abstract

This paper questions contemporary modes and means of scientific presentation and introduces the notion of Image Gravity as a framework for spatial calibration of data into a site specific context. I make the argument that contemporary scientific vernacular has been flattened into a two dimensional space that needs further perceptual interrogation. Empirical observation of scientific phenomena is numerically inscribed to be presented in ways that are trusted, often without the scientist observing the phenomena directly. In this context, at a time when scientific engagement with environmental issues carries significant emotional and visual weight, this paper explores Image Gravity as a perspectival instrument for spatial calibration of scientific data that will challenge our existing communications channels. A proposed speculative framework for Image Gravity is outlined in this paper through the articulation of two vision-based processes; calibration and foregrounding. Through case study examples, we try to construct a baseline for expressing Image Gravity, as a way to show invisible phenomena in the built environment.

Keywords

Data visualization Scientific imaging Perception Remote sensing Observation Invisible phenomena 

References

  1. 1.
    Miles, M.: Eco-Aesthetics Art, Literature and Architecture in a Period of Climate Change. Bloomsbury Academic, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barnes, J., Dove, M.R.: Climate Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives on Climate Change. Yale University Press, New Haven (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karwas, D.: Image credit (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Latour, B.: Visualisation and cognition: drawing things together. Knowl. Soc.: Stud. Sociol. Cult. Past Present 6, 1–40 (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mars Exploration Program Image Credit NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSS website. https://mars.nasa.gov/resources/5368/billion-pixel-view-from-curiosity-at-rocknest-white-balanced/. Accessed 21 Sept 2018
  6. 6.
    Vertesi, J.: Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodwin, C.: Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96(3), 606–633 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barad, K.M.: Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press, Durham (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    University of Notre Dame Center for Theology, Science and Human Flourishing Leonardo Da Vinci’s Ethics of Science Page. www.ctshf.nd.edu/posts/leonardo-da-vincis-ethics-of-science. Accessed 2 June 2018

  10. 10.
    Preda, A.: New planets for old: a posthumanist ecocritical approach to Jeanette Winterson’s Ustopia. Caietele Echinox 34, 143–160 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    TERRAPATTERN. www.terrapattern.com/. Accessed 21 Sept 2018
  12. 12.
    The Glass Bead Research Page on The Perspectival Eye. www.glass-bead.org/research-platform/the-perspectival-eye/?lang=enview. Accessed 02 June 2018
  13. 13.
    Sinta Werner. http://sintawerner.net/. Accessed 21 Sept 2018
  14. 14.
    BK Bioreactor. http://www.bkbioreactor.com. Accessed 21 Sept 2018
  15. 15.
    The Satellite. http://thesatelliteproject.herokuapp.com. Accessed 21 Feb 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations