Advertisement

Continuum Percolation and Spatial Point Pattern in Application to Urban Morphology

  • Hoai Nguyen HuynhEmail author
Chapter
  • 789 Downloads
Part of the Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology book series (MSSET)

Abstract

One of the important problems in studying urban morphology is to be able to quantify urban objects using mathematical descriptions or measures. Doing so allows one to make a comparison amongst different types of geometry/morphology in urban systems, and effectively classify them. A number of techniques have indeed been developed in urban/geographical analysis. Here in this work, we propose a method to quantify spatial patterns of a set of points based on the idea of percolation, that is rooted in mathematical physics and has been applied to various fields. Employing the idea of percolation enables us to characterise the relative spatial arrangement of points in a set. In particular, the method could be applied to analyse the distribution of different point datasets in urban context and illustrate how it could characterise and classify their spatial patterns. We show that different spatial distributions of points can generally be classified into four groups with distinctive features: clustered, dispersed or regularly distributed at single or multiple length-scales. In applying to urban morphology, the results could enable quantitative discussion on the existence of two different forms of urban system: well-planned and organically grown.

Keywords

Urban morphology Spatial point pattern Buffer radius Cluster Percolation Geometry 

Notes

Acknowledgements

HNH acknowledges the support of A*STAR International Fellowship (Ref: AGA/SE-17/FS-023/SE/AIF/14/003).

References

  1. K. F. Anschuetz, R. H. Wilshusen and C. L. Scheick, “An Archaeology of Landscapes: Perspectives and Directions,” Journal of Archaeological Research, vol. 9, p. 157, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. E. Arcaute, C. Molinero, E. Hatna, R. Murcio, C. Vargas-Ruiz, A. P. Masucci and M. Batty, “Cities and regions in Britain through hierarchical percolation,” Royal Society Open Science, vol. 3, p. 150691, 2016.Google Scholar
  3. P. Balister, A. Sarkar and B. Bollobás, “Percolation, Connectivity, Coverage and Colouring of Random Geometric Graphs,” in Handbook of Large-Scale Random Networks, Berlin, Springer, 2008, pp. 117–142.Google Scholar
  4. M. Barthelemy, P. Bordin, H. Berestycki and M. Gribaudi, “Self-organization versus top-down planning in the evolution of a city,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, p. 2153, 2013.Google Scholar
  5. M. Batty, The New Science of Cities, MIT Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  6. E. Bertin, Statistical Physics of Complex Systems, Springer, 2016.Google Scholar
  7. L. M. A. Bettencourt, J. Lobo, D. Helbing, C. Kühnert and G. B. West, “Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, p. 7301, 2007.Google Scholar
  8. J. Burguet and P. Andrey, “Statistical Comparison of Spatial Point Patterns in Biological Imaging,” PLoS ONE, vol. 2, p. e87759, 2014.Google Scholar
  9. Y. Chen and J. Wang, “Multifractal characterization of urban form and growth: the case of Beijing,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 40, p. 884, 2013.Google Scholar
  10. J. Cheng and I. Masser, “Modelling urban growth patterns: a multiscale perspective,” Environment and Planning A, vol. 35, p. 679, 2003.Google Scholar
  11. C. Domb, M. S. Green and J. L. Lebowitz, Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, London: Academic Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander and X. Xu, “A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise,” in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1996.Google Scholar
  13. T. Fluschnik, S. Kriewald, A. García Cantú Ros, B. Zhou, D. E. Reusser, J. P. Kropp and D. Rybski, “The Size Distribution, Scaling Properties and Spatial Organization of Urban Clusters: A Global and Regional Percolation Perspective,” ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, vol. 5, p. 110, 2016.Google Scholar
  14. A. S. Fotheringham, C. Brunsdon and M. Charlton, Quantitative Geography: Perspectives on Spatial Data Analysis, Sage, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. D. Helbing, J. Keltsch and P. Molnár, “Modelling the evolution of human trail systems,” Nature, vol. 388, p. 47, 1997.Google Scholar
  16. H. Hinrichsen, “Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states,” Advance in Physics, vol. 49, pp. 815–958, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. H. N. Huynh, E. Makarov, E. F. Legara, C. Monterola and L. Y. Chew, “Characterisation and comparison of spatial patterns in urban systems: A case study of US cities,” Journal of Computational Science, vol. 24, pp. 34–43, 2018.Google Scholar
  18. J. Illian, A. Penttinen, H. Stoyan and D. Stoyan, Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns, Wiley, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. H. J. d. Knegt, F. v. Langevelde, M. B. Coughenour, A. K. Skidmore, W. F. d. Boer, I. M. A. Heitkönig, N. M. Knox, R. Slotow, C. v. d. Waal and H. H. T. Prins, “Spatial autocorrelation and the scaling of species-environment relationships,” Ecology, vol. 91, pp. 2455–2465, 2010.Google Scholar
  20. F. Li and L. Zhang, “Comparison of point pattern analysis methods for classifying the spatial distributions of spruce-fir stands in the north-east USA,” Forestry, vol. 80, pp. 337–349, 2007.Google Scholar
  21. P. Longley, M. Batty, J. Shepherd and G. Sadler, “Do Green Belts Change the Shape of Urban Areas? A Preliminary Analysis of the Settlement Geography of South East England,” Regional Studies, vol. 26, p. 437, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. H. A. Makse, J. S. Andrade, M. Batty, S. Havlin and H. E. Stanley, “Modeling Urban Growth Patterns with Correlated Percolation,” Physical Review E, vol. 58, pp. 7054–7062, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. H. A. Makse, J. S. J. Andrade, M. Batty, S. Havlin and H. E. Stanley, “Modeling urban growth patterns with correlated percolation,” Physical Review E, vol. 58, p. 7054, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. R. Meester and R. Roy, Continuum Percolation, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  25. P. Mellars, “Going east: New genetic and archaeological perspectives on the modern human colonization of Eurasia,” Science, vol. 313, p. 796, 2006.Google Scholar
  26. M. E. J. Newman and R. M. Ziff, “Efficient Monte Carlo Algorithm and High-Precision Results for Percolation,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, pp. 4104–4107, 2000.Google Scholar
  27. Q. Nie, X. Jianhua and L. Zuhan, “Fractal and multifractal characteristic of spatial pattern of urban impervious surfaces,” Earth Science Informatics, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 381, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. A. Penttinen, D. Stoyan and H. M. Henttonen, “Marked Point Processes in Forest Statistics,” Forest Science, vol. 38, pp. 806–824, 1992.Google Scholar
  29. D. Piovani, C. Molinero and A. Wilson, “Urban retail location: Insights from percolation theory and spatial interaction modeling,” PLoS ONE, vol. 12, p. e0185787, 2017.Google Scholar
  30. B. D. Ripley, “Modelling Spatial Patterns,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, vol. 39, pp. 172–212, 1977.Google Scholar
  31. B. D. Ripley, “The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 13, pp. 255–266, 1976.Google Scholar
  32. E. F. Schumacher, “Patterns of Human Settlement,” Ambio, vol. 5, p. 91, 1976.Google Scholar
  33. C. Small, F. Pozzi and C. Elvidge, “Spatial analysis of global urban extent from DMSP-OLS night lights,” Remote Sensing of Environment, vol. 96, p. 277, 2005.Google Scholar
  34. H. E. Stanley, “Scaling, universality, and renormalization: Three pillars of modern critical phenomena,” Review of Modern Physics, vol. 71, pp. S358–S366, 1999.Google Scholar
  35. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to percolation theory, London: Taylor & Francis, 1994.Google Scholar
  36. D. Stoyan and A. Penttinen, “Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics,” Statistical Science, vol. 15, pp. 61–78, 2000.Google Scholar
  37. D. I. Uzunov, Introduction to the Theory of Critical Phenomena: Mean Field, Fluctuations and Renormalization, 2nd ed., Singapore: World Scientific, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. G. M. Viswanathan, E. P. Raposo and M. G. E. da Luz, Perspectives and Challenges in Statistical Physics and Complex Systems for the Next Decade, World Scientific, 2014.Google Scholar
  39. G. West, Scale: The Universal Laws of Life and Death in Organisms, Cities and Companies, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2017.Google Scholar
  40. J. Zucchetto, “Energy and the future of human settlement patterns: Theory, models and empirical considerations,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 20, p. 85, 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science Technology and ResearchSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics, Imperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations