Advertisement

Organization Promotes Safety: A Step Forward

  • Kimberly A. Pollock
  • Jonathan L. Benumof
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter outlines the accidental instillation of lidocaine instead of bupivacaine into the intrathecal space in a healthy patient undergoing a cesarean section. Luckily, no adverse outcome was noted; however, not all syringe swaps are so benign. With patients living longer and disease processes becoming more advanced, anesthetic management has become more complicated. Multiple drugs may be drawn up rapidly in order to acutely manage a sick patient. With the growing need for efficiency in the operating room comes the increased risk of drug errors, accidental needlestick injuries, and contamination. In order to protect both the patient and the provider from these hazards, a well-organized and systematic approach that addresses the potential for error at all stages is necessary. This chapter proposes a standardized way to organize drugs for a basic general anesthetic case, syringes and instruments for placing central venous catheters, as well as offers a unique approach for organizing the spinal and epidural trays in a way that should theoretically decrease these potential hazards. It is important to note that the most crucial aspect of establishing patient and provider safety in the workplace is having a method that is well thought out and practiced routinely by its providers.

Keywords

Definition drug error Syringe swap Drug container swap Labeling error Colossal error Incidence Factors Drugs in error Cross-contamination Needlestick injury Potential error times Drug drawer problems Drug drawer solutions Syringe sizes Drug labels The geography of location Tabletop workstation Cart workstation Above the tabletop workstation Plunger label Central venous catheter tray Needle gauge and hub Syringe layout Spinal tray Epidural tray 

References

  1. 1.
    Abeyekera A, Bergman IJ, Kluger MT, Short TG. Drug error in anaesthetic practice: a review of 896 reports from the Australian incident monitoring study database. Anaesth: J Assoc Anaesthetists Great Brit Ireland. 2005;60(3):220–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Currie M, Mackay P, Morgan C, Runciman WB, Russell WJ, Sellen A, Webb RK, Williamson JA. The Austrailain incident monitoring study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993;21(5):596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Webster CS, Merry AF, Larsson L, McGrath KA, Weller J. The frequency and nature of drug administration error during anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2001;29(5):494–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosenberg AD, Bernstein DB, Berntein RL, Skovron ML, Ramanathan S, Turndorf H. Accidental needlesticks: do anesthesiologists practice proper infection control precautions? Am J Anesthesiol. 1995;22(3):125–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Recommendations for infection control for the practice of anesthesiology (3rd edition) developed by the ASA committee on Occupational Health and Force on Infection Control. 20 Oct 2010. https://asahq.org/~/media/sites/asahq/files/public/resources/asa%20committees/recommendations-for-infection-control-for-the-practice-of-anesthesiology-(1).pdf?la=en. Accessed 12/11/14.
  6. 6.
    Kroll H, Mandell S, Goldman J, Brown M. The use of syringes with a T-port extension set: is it safe? Anesthesiology. 1994;81(3A):A1271.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Green ES, Berry AJ, Arnold WP, Jagger J. Percutaneous injuries in anesthesia personnel. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(2):273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shultz J, Davies JM, Caird J, Chrisholm S, Ruggles K, Puls R. Standardizing anesthesia medication drawers using human factors and quality assurance methods. Can J Anesth. 2010;57:490–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gibbs M, Kuczkowski K, Benumof J. Complete recovery from prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation following anaphylactic reaction to readministered IV cefazolin. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003;47(2):230–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jelacic S, Bowdle A, Nair BG, Kusulos D, Bower L, Togashi K. A system for anesthesia drug administration using barcode technology: the codonics safe label system and smart anesthesia manager. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(2):410–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grissinger M. Color-coded syringes for anesthesia drugs–use with care. Pharm Ther. 2012;37(4):199–201.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirabayashi Y, Kawakami T, Suzuki H, Igarashi T, Saitoh K, Seo N. The effect of coloured syringes and a coloured sheet on the incidence of syringe swaps during anesthetic management. Masui. 2005;54(9):1060–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fasting S, Gisvold SE. Adverse drug errors in anesthesia, and the impact of coloured syringe labels. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47(11):1060–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    The road to zero: reducing the incidence of central line associated bloodsream infections and needlestick injuries. http://www.teleflex.com/en/usa/productAreas/vascularAccess/documents/faqs/CVC_2498%20ErgoPack%20Whitepaper%20M1%202011-0283.pdf. Accessed 12/6/2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberly A. Pollock
    • 1
  • Jonathan L. Benumof
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiologyUniversity of California, UCSD Medical Center, UCSD School of MedicineSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations