Advertisement

Ecological Assessment Based on Environmental Product Declarations

  • Tobias BrinkmannEmail author
  • Lukas Metzger
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management book series (SPLCEM)

Abstract

For some years now, environmental product declarations (EPDs) have been available to the public mainly for b2b communication. These contain important environmental impact categories (EIC) and are based on an externally audited life cycle analysis (LCA) according to current ISO standards. The information from EPDs can be used for company-internal product benchmarks and ecological optimizations. The method described in this paper follows the German Federal Environment Agency’s ecological priority method and investigates ecological scarcity, distance-to-target and specific contribution. The article explains the ecological single-score method based on EPD data and validates it against common single score assessments (ReCiPe and UBP). Therefore, 9 case studies have been examined by comparing the full LCA with the results of the new method based on EPD data. As a result, 8 out of 9 studies have similar results with the same benchmark rating. With this information important action alternatives for the future can be derived and ecological product optimization can be pursued.

Keywords

Eco-efficiency analysis (EEA) Environmental product declarations (EPD) Single-score analysis Environmental benchmarks Ecological priority 

References

  1. 1.
    DIN EN ISO 14025 (2011) Umweltkennzeichnungen und—deklarationen. Typ III UmweltdeklarationenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson J (2018) Update to 2018 EPD numbers. Online available at https://constructionlca.wordpress.com/2018/04/18/update-to-2018-epd-numbers/
  3. 3.
    DIN EN 15804 (2014) Nachhaltigkeit von Bauwerken—UmweltproduktdeklarationenGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DIN EN ISO 14040 (2009) Umweltmanagement-Ökobilanz- Grundsätze und RahmenbedingungenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DIN EN ISO 14044 (2006) Umweltmanagement-Ökobilanz-Anforderungen und Anleitungen. Anforderungen und AnleitungenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    UBA (Umweltbundesamt) (1999) Texte 92/1999: Bewertung in Ökobilanzen—Methode des Umweltbundesamtes zur Normierung von Wirkungsindikatoren, Ordnung (Rangbildung) von Wirkungskategorien und zur Auswertung nach ISO 14042 und 14043 (Version ’99)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    ReCiPe (URL) Downloads—ReCiPe. Characterisation and Normalisation factors (updated Dec. 2014). Online available at http://www.lcia-recipe.net/file-cabinet
  8. 8.
    Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU) (2013) Methode der ökologischen Knappheit—Ökofaktoren 2013Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    DIN EN ISO 14024 (2018) Umweltkennzeichnungen und -deklarationen - Umweltkennzeichnung Typ I - Grundsätze und VerfahrenGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    DIN EN ISO 14021 (2016) Umweltkennzeichnungen und –deklarationen- Umweltbezogene Anbietererklärungen (Umweltkennzeichnung Typ II)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saling, P (2016) The BASF Eco-Efficiency Analysis. A 20 Year success story. ISBN 978-3-00-054273-2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brands & values GmbHBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations