Advertisement

The Three Paradigms of Social Organization

  • Theodore PapailiasEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper, which is part of a more general research, is to investigate the determinant factors that often influence or control the changes in the organization of society.

The “paradigms” of social structure are three: nomadic life, city-state and state-empire. All of them co-existed and were dominant in the greatest part of world history. The development of social systems moves reciprocally between these three paradigms. In this framework, it is possible for the political regime, in each paradigm, to vary. However, the trend towards the “whole” (globalized society) seems to be something “natural”.

The method employed is based on the analysis of historical development, while it attempts to estimate the trends.

Keywords

Paradigm Society structure City-state Nomads Empire Globalization 

References

  1. Anderson, P. (1974). Passages from antiquity to feudalism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. (1998). The politics. Translated by C.D.C. Reeve. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bloch, M. (1940). La Société féodale, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Braudel, F. (1949). La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen a l’époque de Philippe II.Google Scholar
  5. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex.Google Scholar
  6. Emmanuel, A. (1969). L’échange inégal: essai sur les antagonismes dans les rapports économiques internationaux. Paris: Maspero.Google Scholar
  7. Le Goff, J. (1964). La civilisation de l’occident Médiéval. Artaud.Google Scholar
  8. Ostrogorsky, G. (1940). Geschichte des byzantinischen Staates.Google Scholar
  9. Papailias, T. (1999). The defining factors of globalization. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference in Messologi, Greece.Google Scholar
  10. Papailias, T. (2002). The community in the framework of globalization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference in Messologi, Greece.Google Scholar
  11. Pirenne, H. (1937). Mahomet et Charlemagne (p. 224, 1re édn.). Paris: Les Presses universitaires de France, 1992. Collection Quadrige.Google Scholar
  12. Vryonis, S. Jr. (1971). The decline of medieval Hellenism in Asia minor and the process of Islamization from eleventh through the fifteen century. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Weber, M. (1922). Die drei reinen Typen der legitimen Herrschaft. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of West AtticaAigaleoGreece

Personalised recommendations