Advertisement

Usage Evaluation Through Data Analysis of the Greek Tax Information System

  • Valsamidis Stavros Email author
  • Petasakis Ioannis 
  • Sotirios Kontogiannis
  • Perdiki Fotini 
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

Every information system has to be positively accepted by its users in order to be successful in practice. Even though its usage is mandatory, the users have to use it without negative intention. Improving e-government services by using them more effectively is a major focus globally. It requires public administrations (PAs) to be transparent, accountable, and provide qualitative, trustworthy, controllable, and compatible services that improve users’ confidence. The Greek taxation information system (Taxisnet) is now in the second decade of its operation and is characterized as a mature and expandable information system. The factors which affect its use by the tax office employees constitute an interesting field of study. The purpose of this study is to investigate the parameters affecting the positive or negative intentions of the office employees to use Taxisnet taking into consideration some critical parameters: Control, Complexity, Compatibility, Information Quality, System Quality and Trust. Data mining techniques and regression analysis are the main axes for the achievement of this goal. Although the research was conducted in the tax office employees of only four branches of the Region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace (REMTh), the results can be generalized to the employees of other regions as well. This paper could also be a pilot for a general investigation of (1) the factors of acceptance of e-government systems by employees and (2) the factors that affect employees’ intention to accept the e-government services.

Keywords

Tax information system Usage evaluation Data mining techniques 

References

  1. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proceedings of 20th international conference on very large data bases (pp. 487–499).Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., & Verkamo, A. I. (1996). Fast discovery of association rules. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 12(1), 307–328.Google Scholar
  3. Anagnostopoulos, D. (2006). Projects of the General Secretariat for Information systems. In Speech in the context of the 1st EU Summit on observing IT society, Athens, Greece, pp. 27–29.Google Scholar
  4. Beattie, V., & Pratt, K. (2003). Issues concerning web-based business reporting: An analysis of the views of interested parties. The British Accounting Review, 35(2), 155–187.Google Scholar
  5. Belanger, A., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 165–176.Google Scholar
  6. Bélanger, F., Hiller, J., & Smith, W. (2002). Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: The role of privacy, security, and site attributes. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 245–270.Google Scholar
  7. Chadwick, S. (2001). Communicating trust in e-commerce interactions. Management Communication Quarterly, 14, 653–658.Google Scholar
  8. Colesca, S. E. (2009). Understanding trust in e-government. The Engineering Economist, 33, 7–15.Google Scholar
  9. Cunningham, S. J., & Holmes, G. (1999). Developing innovative applications in agriculture using data mining. In Proceedings of the Southeast Asia Regional Computer Confederation Conference.Google Scholar
  10. Davidaviciene, V. (2008). Change management decisions in the information Age. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(4), 299–307.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical model. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.Google Scholar
  12. Do, T. H. N., & Shih, W. (2016). The Integration between the UTAUT with IS success model in case of online hotel booking user acceptance. Research Journal of Commerce and Behavioural Science, 5, 25–36.Google Scholar
  13. Economides, A. A., & Terzis, V. (2008). Evaluating tax sites: An evaluation framework and its application. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 5(3), 321–344.Google Scholar
  14. Eynon, R. (2007). Breaking barriers to eGovernment: Overcoming obstacles to improving European public services (p. 90). Brussels: DG Information Society and Media. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  15. Floropoulos, J., Spathis, C., Halvatzis, D., & Tsipouridou, M. (2010, February). Measuring the success of the Greek taxation information system. International Journal of Information Management: The Journal for Information Professionals, 30(1), 47–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.013.Google Scholar
  16. García, E., Romero, C., Ventura, S., & Calders, T. (2007, September). Drawbacks and solutions of applying association rule mining in learning management systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Applying Data Mining in e-Learning (ADML 2007) (pp. 13–22). Crete, Greece.Google Scholar
  17. Golubeva, A., Merkuryeva, I., & Shulakov, N. (2005, Spring). Development of e-government in St.-Petersburg: Evaluation of Web sites performance and usability. Occasional Papers in Public Administration and Public Policy, VI(2), 15–30 (NISPAcee).Google Scholar
  18. Grandison, T., & Sloman, M. (2000). A survey of trust in internet applications. IEEE Communications Survey and Tutorials, 3, 2–16.Google Scholar
  19. Gupta, M. P., & Jana, D. (2003). E-government evaluation: A framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 365–387.Google Scholar
  20. Gupta, B., Dasgupta, S., & Gupta, A. (2008). Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, 140–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.004.Google Scholar
  21. Hahamis, P., Iles, J., & Healy, M. (2005). E-government in Greece: Bridging the gap between need and reality. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 3(4), 185–192.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffman, D., Novak, T., & Peralta, M. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of the ACM, 42, 80–85.Google Scholar
  23. Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1838–1852.Google Scholar
  24. Hung, S. Y., Chang, C. M., & Yn, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of on line tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23, 97–122.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, D. S., & Grayson, K. (2005). Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. Journal of Business Research, 58(4), 500–507.Google Scholar
  26. Kantardzic, M. (2003). Data mining: Concepts, models, methods, and algorithms. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  27. Kaufmann, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, G.-H., Trimi, S., & Chung, J.-H. (2014). Big-data applications in the government sector. Communications of the ACM, 57(3), 78–85.Google Scholar
  29. Lau, C., & Halkyard, A. (2003). From e-commerce to e-business taxation. Asia-Pacific tax bulletin (pp. 1–12). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall PTR.Google Scholar
  30. Liu, B., & Hsu, W. (1996). Post-analysis of learned rules. In Proceedings of national conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 828–834). Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, B., Hsu, W., Chen, S., & Ma, Y. (2000). Analyzing the subjective interestingness of association rules. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15(5), 47–55.Google Scholar
  32. MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (pp. 281–297). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.Google Scholar
  34. McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.Google Scholar
  35. McKnight, H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, 334–359.Google Scholar
  36. Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Tan, P.-.N, & Punch, W.F. (2004). Mining interesting contrast rules for a web-based educational system. In Proceedings of international conference on machine learning applications (pp. 320–327). Louisville.Google Scholar
  37. Miyazaki, A., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35, 27–44.Google Scholar
  38. OECD. (2008). Annual report, public affairs division, public affairs and communications directorate.Google Scholar
  39. Pant, V., Stiner, M. S., & Wagner, P. W. (2004). E-taxation: An introduction to the use of TaxXML for corporate tax reporting. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 2(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
  40. Raus, M., Lin, J., & Kipp, A. (2010). Evaluating IT innovations in a business- to government context: A framework and it’s applications. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 122–133.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  42. Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  43. Sichtmann, C. (2007). An analysis of antecedents and consequences of trust in a corporate brand. European Journal of Marketing, 41, 999–1015.  https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710773318.Google Scholar
  44. Terpsiadou, M. H., & Economides, A. A. (2009). The use of information systems in the Greek Public financial services: The case of TAXIS. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 468–476.Google Scholar
  45. Terzis, V., & Economides, A. A. (2007). Critical success factors for tax web sites. In J. Makolm, & G. Orthofer (Eds.), E-taxation: State and perspectives: E-government in the field of taxation trauner verlag in its informatics series (pp. 56–67).Google Scholar
  46. Tornatzky, L., & Klein, K. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A metaanalysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29, 28–45.Google Scholar
  47. Tripathi, A., & Parihar, B. (2011). E-governance challenges and cloud benefits. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE) (Vol. 1, pp. 351–354). Shanghai: IEEE.Google Scholar
  48. Wang, Y. S. (2002). The adoption of electronic tax filing systems: An empirical study. Government Information Quarterly, 20, 333–352.Google Scholar
  49. Wang, T. D., & Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 105–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.008.Google Scholar
  50. Wang, Y.-S., & Liao, Y.-W. (2007). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.002.Google Scholar
  51. Wang, L., Bretschneider, S., & Gant, J. (2005, January). Evaluating web-based e-government services with a citizen-centric approach. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 129b–129b). IEEE.Google Scholar
  52. Warkentin, M., Gefan, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-Government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157–162.Google Scholar
  53. Witten, I., & Frank, E. (2005). Data mining practical machine learning tools and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valsamidis Stavros 
    • 1
    Email author
  • Petasakis Ioannis 
    • 1
  • Sotirios Kontogiannis
    • 2
  • Perdiki Fotini 
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Accounting and FinanceTEI of Eastern Macedonia and ThraceKavalaGreece
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations