Advertisement

The Way Out from the Public Sector’s Labyrinth of Inefficiency? Alternative Governance Performance and Prospects in Greece

  • Sifis Plimakis
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This chapter presents empirical research analyses and evaluates according to primary empirical data the viability and effectiveness of the alternative institutional arrangement for municipal services provision in the distinctive environment of Greek local government. The alternative provision appears to lead to cost reduction and quality improvement in most case studies analyzed, assuming, however, the appearance of a series of determinant factors of services performance, relating to the level of the competition and mainly the establishment of relationships of trust, mutual collaboration, engagement, and common culture among the partners and the stakeholders. Factors that transform the alternative provision from a simple cost rationalization tool into a promotion catalyst of a new governance model in Greek local government.

Keywords

Local government reform Alternative provision Efficiency Consultation Competition Social capital 

References

  1. Afonso, A. (Ed.) (2010). Public sector efficiency: International comparisons. EIB.Google Scholar
  2. Agranoff, R. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local government. New York: Sunny Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, G. (2008). Factors explaining local privatization: A meta-regression analysis. Public Choice, 36(2), 206–228.Google Scholar
  4. Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2008). Managing performance international comparisons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bouckaert, G., & Pollitt, C. (2010). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bovis, M. (2008). Public–private partnerships in European Union. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Boyne, G. A. (1998). The determinants of variations in local service contracting: Garbage in, garbage out? Urban Affairs Review, 34(1), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyne, G. (2000). Public choice and local government reform. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bozeman, B. (2011). Rules and red tape. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  11. Brudney, J., & Bozeman, B. (2008). Statistical analysis for public administration. New York: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Brudney, J. L., Fernandez, S., Ryu, J. E., & Wright, D. S. (2005). Exploring and explaining contracting out: Patterns among the American states. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 367–391.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, S. (2008). Identifying the moderator factors of financial performance in Greek Municipalities. Financial Accountability and Management, 24(3), 265–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denhart, T. (2000). The new public service: Serving, not steering. New York: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  15. Dexia Bank. (2004–2011). European public – Private partnerships market report.Google Scholar
  16. Dexia Bank. (2011). Subnational governments in European Union. Paris: Dexia Press.Google Scholar
  17. Dollery, J. (2007). Reform and leadership in public sector: A political economy approach. Sydney: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dollery, D. (2008). The political economy of local government reform: A comparative analysis of advanced Anglo-American countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Edwards P., Shaoul J., Stafford A., & Arblaste L. (2004). Evaluating the operation of PFI in roads and hospitals. ACCA research report no. 88, London.Google Scholar
  20. Featherstone, K. (2008). The limits of Europeanization: Structural reform and public policy in Greece. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez, S. (2007). What works best when contracting for services? An analysis of contracting performance at the local level. Public Administration, 85(1), 119–134.Google Scholar
  22. Fernandez, S. (2009). Understanding contracting performance: An empirical analysis. Administration and Society, 41(1), 67–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fernandez, S., Ryu, J. E., & Brudney, J. L. (2008). Exploring variations in contracting for services among American local governments: Do politics still matter? American Review of Public Administration, 38(2), 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferris, J. M. (1986). The decision to contract out: An empirical analysis. Urban Affairs Review, 22(2), 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greene, J. D. (2002). Cities and privatization: Prospects for the new century. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  26. Hefetz, A., & Warner, M. (2004). Privatization and its reverse: Explaining the dynamics of the government contracting process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heinelt, H. (2006). Legitimacy and urban governance: A cross-national comparative study. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodge, G. (2004). Public–private partnerships: International comparisons. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hodge, G. A. (2010). International handbook of public – Private partnerships. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hood, C. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karkatsoulis, P. (2004). State in transition. Athens: Sideris.Google Scholar
  32. Karkatsoulis, P. (2011). Regulation, deregulation and reform of public policy. Athens: Sideri.Google Scholar
  33. Kazakos, P. (2001). Between state and market. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
  34. Klijn, E. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: Public–private controversies. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  35. Konsolas, N. (1997). Modern regional economic policy. Athens: Papazisis.Google Scholar
  36. Lavdas, K. (1997). The Europeanization of Greece. London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maistros, P. (2009). The three waves of public administration reform in Greece. Athens: Papazisis.Google Scholar
  38. Makridimitris, A., & Michalopoulos, N. (2000). Expert reports on the Greek public administration. Athens: Papazisis.Google Scholar
  39. OECD. (2011). Greece: Review of the central administration.Google Scholar
  40. Osborne, S. (Ed.). (2004). Public-private partnerships. Theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Osborne, S. (2008). New public governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  43. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Bloomington: University of Indiana Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagoulatos, G. (2005). The politics of privatization: Redrawing the public-private boundary. West European Politics, 28(1), 111–131.Google Scholar
  45. Paraskevopoulos, C. (2000). Social capital and public–private distinction in Greek Regions. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 302–319.Google Scholar
  46. Patton, J. (2008). Realistic evaluation. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  47. Peters, G. (2004). The future of governing. Kansas: Kansas University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Plimakis S. (2012). Individual participation in the Greek local government: Regulation and accountability, under the constellation of bureaucracy. Unpublished Doctorate Dissertation.Google Scholar
  49. Prime Minister’s Office – General Secretariat of Government. (1992). Prospects and areas of private enterprise participation in local government.Google Scholar
  50. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  52. Shah, A. (2012). Local governance in industrial countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Stoker, G. (2003). Towards holistic governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Stoker, G. (2006). Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tatsos, N. (1999). Fiscal decentralisation: Theory and practice. Athens: Tipothoto.Google Scholar
  56. Trova, E. (2007). Public–Private sector partnerships: European and national law. Athens: Greek Lettering.Google Scholar
  57. Van de Walle, S. (2005). Measuring bureaucratic quality in governance indicators. Leuven: Instituut voor de Overheid.Google Scholar
  58. Warner, M., & Hebdon, R. (2001). Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(3), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Warner, M. E., & Hefetz, A. (2002). Applying market solutions to public services: An assessment of efficiency, equity and voice. Urban Affairs Review, 19(1), 96–100.Google Scholar
  60. Wollmann, H. (2008). The provision of public services in Europe: Between state, local government and market. London: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  61. Yetimis P., & Marava, N. (2005). New relations between private and public sector in the production and operation of high scale infrastructural projects in Greece. Trends and developments in the 1980 and 1990 decades. Panteion University.Google Scholar
  62. Yiannitsis, A. (1994). Privatisation issues in Greece. Athens: Livanis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sifis Plimakis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science and International RelationsUniversity of PeloponneseKorinthosGreece

Personalised recommendations