Advertisement

How Do Writers Engage Their Readers?

  • Jeremy Koay
Chapter
Part of the Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse book series (PSDS)

Abstract

This chapter examines how writers use language to engage their readers, as well as how genre influences writers’ choice of engagement strategies. The strategies discussed are reader pronouns, directives, questions, and narratives. In exploring the relationship between engagement strategies and genre, the functions of questions in self-improvement books are also considered. The most frequent function of questions in this genre is to prompt readers to reflect on their life experiences. This function reflects the values and expectations of members of this community. Similarly, the way writers use narratives in self-improvement books also reflects assumptions that readers and writers share.

Keywords

Directive Engagement Narrative Question Reader pronouns Values 

References

  1. Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1994). Is that a rhetorical question? Ambiguity and power in medical discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 4(2), 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text & Talk, 28(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, P. (2010). Questions and their responses in Tzeltal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(10), 2627–2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheong, E.-Y. (1999). Analysis of sermons delivered by Korean, Filipino and American pastors: The view of genre analysis. RELC Journal, 30(2), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1997). The teaching of academic listening comprehension and the question of authenticity. English for Specific Purposes, 16(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Freed, A. F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(6), 621–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu, X. (2012). The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings. Discourse Studies, 14(4), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodwin, M. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text & Talk, 26(4/5), 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holmes, J. (2005). Story-telling at work: A complex discursive resource for integrating personal, professional and social identities. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holmes, J., & Chiles, T. (2010). “Is that right?” Questions and questioning as control device in the workplace. In A. Freed & S. Ehrlich (Eds.), “Why do you ask?” The function of questions in institutional discourse (pp. 187–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader. Written Communication, 18(4), 549–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helme (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  19. Manning, T. (2012). The art of successful persuasion: Seven skills you need to get your point across effectively. Industrial and Commercial Training, 44(3), 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGrath, L., & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosenblatt, L. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vine, B. (2009). Directives at work: Exploring the contextual complexity of workplace directives. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), 1395–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeremy Koay
    • 1
  1. 1.EduMaxiAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations