Advertisement

The Entrenchment of Statistical Thinking in Early Twentieth Century Differential Psychology

  • James T. LamiellEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology book series (PSTHP)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how aggregate statistical methods of investigation made their way into scientific psychology via the portal created by the establishment of a subdiscipline devoted to the systematic study of individual and group differences in various aspects of human psychological functioning. Two textbooks authored by William Stern (1871–1938), one published in 1900 and the other in 1911, were of major significance in the founding of this subdiscipline, called ‘differential’ psychology. The 1911 text, reflecting Stern’s more developed view, emphasized the distinction between population-level statistical knowledge about variables with respect to which individuals have been differentiated, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, knowledge of the individuals who have been differentiated in terms of those variables. However, other influential contemporaries of Stern’s such as E. L. Thorndike (1874–1949) and Hugo Münsterberg (1863–1916) did not adopt Stern’s view on this matter, and it was then ignored in widely-read differential psychology textbooks authored by Anne Anastasi (1908–2001) and Leona Tyler (1906–1993). Thus did the notion that statistical knowledge of populations is also knowledge of the individuals within those populations became entrenched among investigators of individual and group differences. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of Stern’s ever-growing concerns over the direction in which differential psychology was moving.

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehard, & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1946). Personalistic psychology as science: A reply. Psychological Review, 53, 132–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anastasi, A. (1937). Differential psychology: Individual and group differences in behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, S. J. (1953). The science of personality: Nomothetic or idiographic? Psychological Review, 60, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic research designs—Their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data analytic system. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 292–303.Google Scholar
  7. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Eysenck, H. J. (1952). The scientific study of personality. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Eysenck, H. J. (1954). The science of personality: Nomothetic! Psychological Review, 61, 339–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Differential psychology before and after William Stern. Psychologische Beiträge, 32, 249–262.Google Scholar
  13. Hanson, F. A. (1993). Testing testing: Social consequences of the examined life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1974). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Lamiell, J. T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lamiell, J. T. (1997). Individuals and the differences between them. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 117–141). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lamiell, J. T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences: Human individuality, scientific psychology, and William Stern’s critical personalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lamiell, J. T. (2006). William Stern (1871–1938) und der « Ursprungsmythos » der differentiellen Psychologie. Journal für Psychologie, 14, 253–273.Google Scholar
  19. Lamiell, J. T. (2018). Rejoinder to Proctor and Xiong. American Journal of Psychology, 131, 489–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landy, F. J. (1992). Hugo Münsterberg: Victim or visionary? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundh, L.-G. (2015). The person as a focus for research: The contributions of Windelband, Stern, Allport, Lamiell, and Magnusson. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1, 15–33.  https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2015.03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Münsterberg, H. (1912). Psychologie und Wirtschaftsleben: ein Beitrag zur angewandten Experimental-Psychologie [Psychology and economic life: A contribution to applied experimental psychology]. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  23. Münsterberg, H. (1913). Psychology and industrial efficiency. Boston and New York: Houghton-Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Proctor, R. W., & Xiong, A. (2018). Adoption of population-level statistical methods did transform psychological science but for the better: Commentary on Lamiell (2018). American Journal of Psychology, 131, 483–487. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Samelson, F. (1974). History, origin myth, and ideology: Comte’s “discovery” of socialpsychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 4, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skaggs, E. B. (1945). Personalistic psychology as science. Psychological Review, 52, 234–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stern, W. (1900). Über Psychologie der individuellen Differenzen (Ideen zu einer “differentiellen Psychologie”) [On the psychology of individual differences (Toward a “differential psychology”)]. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  28. Stern, W. (1903). Angewandte Psychologie [Applied psychology]. Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage, 1, 4–45.Google Scholar
  29. Stern, W. (1911). Die Differentielle Psychologie in ihrer methodischen Grundlagen [Methodological foundations of differential psychology]. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  30. Stern, W. (1914). Psychologie [Psychology]. In D. Sarason (Ed.), Das Jahr 1913: Ein Gesamtbild der Kulturentwicklung (pp. 414–421). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  31. Stern, W. (1916). Der Intelligenzquotient als Maß der kindlichen Intelligenz, insbesondere der Unternormalen [The intelligence quotient as a measure of intelligence in children, with special reference to the sub-normal child]. Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie, 11, 1–18.Google Scholar
  32. Stern, W. (1921). Richtlinien für die Methodik der psychologischen Praxis. Beiheft zur Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie, 29, 1–16.Google Scholar
  33. Stern, W. (1927). Selbstdarstellung [Self-portrayal]. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Philosophie der Gegenwart in Selbstdarstellungen (Vol. 6, pp. 128–184). Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  34. Stern, W. (1929). Persönlichkeitsforschung und Testmethode [Personality research and the methods of testing]. Jahrbuch der Charakterologie, 6, 63–72.Google Scholar
  35. Stern, W. (1930a). Eindrücke von der amerikanischen Psychologie. Bericht über eine Kongreßreise [Impressions of American psychology: Report after travel to a conference]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, experimentelle Pädagogik und Jugendkundliche Forschung, 31, 43–51 and 65–72.Google Scholar
  36. Stern, W. (1930b). Studien zur Personwissenschaft. Erster Teil: Personalistik als Wissenschaft [Studies in the science of persons. Part one: Personalistics as science]. Leipzig: Barth.Google Scholar
  37. Stern, W. (1933). Der personale Faktor in Psychotechnik und praktischer Psychologie [The personal factor in psychotechnics and practical psychology]. Zeitschrift für angewandte Psychologie, 44, 52–63.Google Scholar
  38. Stern, W. (1935). Allgemeine Psychologie auf personalistischer Grundlage [General psychology from the personalistic standpoint]. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  39. Terman, L. M. (1924). The mental test as a psychological method. The Psychological Review, 31, 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Individuality. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  41. Tyler, L. E. (1947). The psychology of human differences. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tyler, L. E. (1978). Individuality: Human possibilities and personal choice in the psychological development of men and women. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Tyler, L. E. (1985). Neglected insights in personology. Unpublished manuscript, Eugene, OR.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Georgetown UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations