Advertisement

Total Organic Carbon in the Water of Polish Dam Reservoirs

  • Andrzej GórniakEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 86)

Abstract

Total organic carbon (TOC) resources in Polish water reservoirs are presented as an important factor affecting water quality and ecosystem trophic state. The study is based on hydrochemical and biological data from 47 reservoirs from the years 2005–2017 and collected from the archives of the Polish National Monitoring Program, provided by the Chief Inspectorate of Environment Protection. The mean (by weight) TOC concentration in reservoirs is 6.3 mg dm−3, with a range from 2.3 mg C dm−3 in the mountains, the Czorsztyn and Sromowce reservoirs, up to 18 mg C dm−3 in the hypereutrophic, lowland Siemianówka reservoir, varying according to reservoir elevation. Although reservoirs are large and deep, there is a significant negative correlation between mean reservoir depth and TOC. Seasonality and national TOC dynamics were strongly related to the rate of precipitation, with maximal concentrations in late spring and minimal in autumn or winter. The first global warming symptoms of TOC changes in reservoirs are noted, which will manifest as increased TOC and greenhouse gas emissions. Increased water retention time, which promotes water eutrophication, increases TOC resources in most Polish dam reservoirs as well as in flooded areas. Mean TOC concentrations are related to certain biological reservoir water parameters, such as phytoplankton index or diatom index. In future planning, Polish reservoirs should be placed outside lowlands, and their capacity should provide a high water exchange, in less than 2 to 3 months.

Keywords

Dam Reservoir Total organic carbon Water 

References

  1. 1.
    Lehner B et al (2011) High-resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front Ecol Environ 9:494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vörösmarty CJ, Sharma KP, Fekete BM, Copeland AH, Holden J, Marble J, Lough A (1997) The storage and aging of continental runoff in large reservoir systems of the world. Ambio 26(4):210–219Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chao BF, Wu YH, Li YS (2008) Impact of artificial reservoir water impoundment on global sea level. Science 320(5873):212–214.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayes NM, Deemer BR, Corman JR, Razavi NR, Strock KE (2017) Key differences between lakes and reservoirs modify climate signals: a case for a new conceptual model. Limnol Oceanogr Lett 2:47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maavara T, Lauerwald R, Regnier P, Van Cappellen P (2017) Global perturbation of organic carbon cycling by river damming. Nat Commun 8:15347.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wetzel RG (2001) Limnology lake and reservoir ecosystems. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thurman LJ, von Wachenfeldt E (2009) Interactions of dissolved organic matter and humic substances. In: Likens GE (ed) Biogeochemistry of inland waters. Academic/Elsevier, Oxford, pp 464–470Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williamson CE, Morris DP, Pace ML, Olson OG (1999) Dissolved organic carbon and nutrients as regulators of lake ecosystems: resurrection of a more integrated paradigm. Limnol Oceanogr 44:795–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Górniak A (1996) Humic substances and their role in freshwater ecosystems functioning. Diss. Univ. Vars. 448, Białystok, p 151 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Environment in 2017 (2017) Polish Statistical Office, WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jokiel P et al (eds) (2017) Hydrology of Poland. Polish Scientific Press Office, Warsaw, p 342 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gutry-Korycka M, Sadurski A, Kundzewicz ZW, Pociask-Karteczka J, Skrzypczyk L (2014) Water resources and their use. Nauka 1:77–98 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Błachuta J, Picińska-Fałtynowicz J (2010) Methodological guidance for conducting of monitoring and evaluation of ecological potential of reservoirs in Poland. IMGW, Wroclaw, p 58 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29:437–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deemer BR, Harrison JA, Li S, Beaulieu JJ, Delsontro T, Barros EN, Bezerra Neto JF, Powers SM, Dos Santos MA, Arie Vonk J (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions from reservoir water surfaces: a new global synthesis. Bioscience 66:949–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tranvik LJ et al (2009) Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol Oceanogr 54:2298–2314.  https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.6_part_2.2298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cole JJ, Prairie YT, Caraco NF, McDowell WH, Tranvik LJ, Striegl RG, Duarte CM, Kortelainen P, Downing JA, Middelburg J, Melack J (2007) Plumbing the global carbon cycle: integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10:111–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Górniak A, Zieliński P, Jekatierynczuk-Rudczyk E, Grabowska M, Suchowolec T (2002) The role of dissolved organic carbon in a shallow lowland reservoir ecosystem – a long-term study. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 30:179–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stanley EH, Powers SM, Lotting NR, Buffam I, Crawford JT (2012) Contemporary changes in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in human-dominated rivers: is there a role for DOC management? Freshw Biol 57(Suppl 1):26–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ford WI, Fox JF (2014) Model of particulate organic carbon transport in an agriculturally impacted stream. Hydrol Process 28:662–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zieliński P, Górniak A, Piekarski MK (2009) The effect of hydrological drought on chemical quality of dissolved organic carbon concentrations in lowland rivers. Pol J Ecol 57:217–227Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thornton KW, Kimmel BL, Payne FE (eds) (1990) Reservoir limnology: ecological perspectives. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Górniak A (2017) Total organic carbon in the waters of Vistula and Niemen basin rivers. Gosp Wodn 1:19–24 (in Polish)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barros N, Cole JJ, Tranvik LJ, Prairie YT, Bastviken D, del Giorgio PA, Roland F, Huszar VLM (2011) Carbon emission from hydroelectric reservoirs linked to reservoir age and latitude. Nat Geosci 4:593–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Catalan N, Marce R, Kothawala DN, Tranvik LJ (2016) Organic carbon decomposition rates controlled by water retention time across inland waters. Nat Geosci 9:501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Górniak A (2017) Spatial and temporal patterns of total organic carbon along the Vistula River course (Central Europe). Appl Geochem 87:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scherer L, Pfister S (2016) Hydropower’s biogenic carbon footprint. PLoS One 11(9):e0161947.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mineeva NM, Bikbulatova EM (2008) The contribution of primary production to the overall organic matter pool in Volga reservoirs. Water Res 35:562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Grabowska M, Mazur-Marzec H (2016) The influence of hydrological conditions on phytoplankton community structure and cyanopeptide concentration in dammed lowland river. Environ Monit Assess 188:488.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5506-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of HydrobiologyInstitute of Biology, University of BiałystokBiałystokPoland

Personalised recommendations