Advertisement

Ontologies of the Fire Safety Domain

  • Yuliya NikulinaEmail author
  • Tatyana Shulga
  • Alexander Sytnik
  • Natalya Frolova
  • Olga Toropova
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 199)

Abstract

This article considers recent research dealing with developing ontologies of fire safety. The authors have made brief overview of ontologies existing in this field and consider possible ways to use them. The latest researches have explored the problem from different angles. It is shows various applications of ontology: there are projects on wildfires, forest fire risk management, fire in buildings and visualization of the spread of smoke. The article draws our attention to the main characteristics of ontologies and the applicability of a particular ontology in different areas. Criteria for ontology comparison have been formulated. According to the research the most important criterions are availability of ontology and scope of use. The type of ontology as a selection criterion will help at the initial stage to make a list of ontologies. The authors presented the results of the analysis in the form of a comparative table. The results can be used to help developers to make the right choice of ontologies.

Keywords

Ontology Ontological engineering Fire safety 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, S., Baliyan, N.: Semantic Web-Based Systems. Springer, Singapore (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoppe, T., Humm, B., Reibold, A.: Semantic Applications. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dolinina, O.: Method of the debugging of the knowledge bases of intellectual decision making systems. In: Automation Control Theory Perspectives in Intelligent Systems, Proceedings of the 5th Computer Science On-Line Conference 2016 (CSOC 2016), vol. 3, pp. 307–314. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danilov, N.A., Shulga, T.E.: Use cases for the usability analysis based on the ontology. In: International Conference on Information Technologies ICIT-2016: Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Manufacturing and Research, pp. 160–166 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Danilov, N., Shulga, T., Frolova, N., Melnikova, N., Vagarina, N., Pchelintseva, E.: Software usability evaluation based on the user pinpoint activity heat map. In: Silhavy, R., Senkerik, R., Oplatkova, Z., Silhavy, P., Prokopova, Z. (eds.) Software Engineering Perspectives and Application in Intelligent Systems, CSOC 2016. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 465, pp. 217–225. Springer, Cham (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Danilov, N.A., Shulga, T.E., Sytnik, A.A.: Repetitive event patterns search in user activity data. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Northwest Russia Conference on Mathematical Methods in Engineering and Technology (MMET NW), St. Petersburg, Russia, 10–14 September 2018, pp. 92–94. Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University “LETI” (2018). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peroni, S.: The SPAR ontologies. In: Vrandečić, D., Bontcheva, K., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C., Presutti, V., Celino, I., Sabou, M., Kaffee, L.-A., Simperl, E. (eds.) The Semantic Web, ISWC 2018, vol. 11137, pp. 119–136. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sytnik, A.A., Shulga, T.E., Danilov, N.A.: Ontology of the “software usability” domain. Trudy ISP RAN/Proc. ISP RAS 30(2), 195–214 (2018). (in Russian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Souza, A.: The ontology of fire, National Center for Biomedical Ontology (2016). https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/FIRE. Accessed 20 Oct 2018
  10. 10.
    Semantic Sensor Grids for Rapid Application Development for Environmental Management. http://linkeddata4.dia.fi.upm.es/ssg4env/index.php/ontologies/12-fire-ontology-network/default.htm. Accessed 15 Oct 2018
  11. 11.
    Semantic web for earth and environmental technology. https://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov. Accessed 21 Oct 2018
  12. 12.
    Bitencourt, K., Durão, F.A., Mendonça, M., De Souza Santana, L.L.B.: An ontological model for fire emergency situations. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E101–D(1), 108–115 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, G., Xu, B., Tu, Q., Sha, Y., Xu, Z.: Towards building ontology for community-based fire management. In: Proceedings 2011 International Conference on Transportation, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineering (TMEE) (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tay, N.N.W., Kubota, N., Botzheim, J.: Building ontology for fire emergency planning and support. E-J. Adv. Maint. 8(2), 13–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bolotnikova, E., Gavrilova, T., Gorovoy, V.: To one method of ontology evaluation. Int. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 50(3), 448–461 (2011). ISSN 1064-2307MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gangemi, A., Catenacci, C., Ciaramita, M., Lehmann, J.: Modelling ontology evaluation and validation. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, ESWC 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4011. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shamszaman, Z.U., Ara, S.S., Chong, I., Jeong, Y.K.: Web-of-objects (WoO)-based context aware emergency fire management systems for the internet of things. Sensors 14, 2944–2966 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of SaratovSaratovRussia

Personalised recommendations