Sketch Design of Information System for Personnel Management of Large State Corporation in the Field of Control Engineering

  • Vadim ZhmudEmail author
  • Alexander Liapidevskiy
  • Galina Frantsuzova
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Systems, Decision and Control book series (SSDC, volume 199)


The need to create an information system for proactive personnel management is particularly acute for many state corporations. The strategy of such management consists, first of all, in not only finding the necessary specialists in due time as the need arises for them, but also in anticipation of these needs. In particular, it is necessary to have a reliable idea of what personnel are trained in the country, what competencies they possess. This analysis by profession and level of preparation should also be obtained with reference to the geography of university graduates, since it is unlikely that a significant part of graduates are ready to change their place of residence without sufficiently weighty motives. The paper analyzes the main tasks of creating such a system and the possibility of using Federal state educational standards for such a search, as well as for actively influencing the process of preparing students. Such influence can be carried out by opening new training profiles, as well as by creating individual educational trajectories through the use of network-based form of education. The paper also contains terminology, discusses the basic background information for creating a preliminary technical project for a pilot version of the system.


Control engineering Automation Personnel management Higher education Competencies Federal educational standards Decision making 


  1. 1.
    Alberto, P.A., Waugh, R.E., Fredrick, L.D., Davis, D.H.: Sight word literacy: a functional-based approach for identification and comprehension of individual words and connected text. Educ. Training Autism Dev. Disabil. 48, 332–350 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anthis, K.: Is it the clicker, or is it the question? Untangling the effects of student response system use. Teach. Psychol. 38(3), 189–193 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Austin, J.L., Lee, M.G., Thibeault, M.D., Bailey, J.S.: Effects of guided notes on university students’ responding and recall of information. J. Behav. Educ. 11(4), 243–254 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyle, J.R.: Enhancing the note-taking skills of students with mild disabilities. Interv. School Clin. 36(4), 221–224 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cakiroglu, O.: Effects of preprinted response cards on rates of academic response, opportunities to respond, and correct on academic responses of students with mild intellectual disability. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 39(1), 73–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cihak, D., Alberto, P.A., Taber-Doughty, T., Gama, R.I.: A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabil. 21, 89–99 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duchaine, E., Green, K.B., Jolivette, K.: Using response cards as a class-wide intervention to decrease challenging behavior. Beyond Behav. 20(1), 3–10 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Embry, D.D., Biglan, A.: Evidence-based kernels: fundamental units of behavioral influence. Clin. Child Family Psychol. Rev. 11, 75–113 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flores, M.M., Ganz, J.B.: Effects of direct instruction on the reading comprehension of students with autism and developmental disabilities. Educ. Train. Dev. Disabil. 44(1), 39–53 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garbo, R., Mangiatordi, A., Negri, S.: A computer based support to guided note taking: a preliminary study on university students with dyslexia. Int. J. Technol. Inclusive Educ. (IJTIE) 1(2), 52–59 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hattie, J., Timperly, H.: The power of feedback. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 81–112 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haydon, T., Marsicano, R., Scott, T.M.: A comparison of choral and individual responding: a review of the literature. Preventing School Fail. 57, 181–188 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hollo, A., Hirn, R.G.: Teacher and student behaviors in the contexts of grade-level and instructional grouping. Preventing School Fail. 59(1), 30–39 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Horn, C.: Response cards: an effective intervention for students with disabilities. Educ. Train. Autism Dev. Disabil. 45, 116–123 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jimenez, B.A., Lo, Y., Saunders, A.: The additive effects of scripted lessons plus guided notes on science quiz scores of students with intellectual disabilities and autism. J. Spec. Educ. 47, 231–244 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Johnson, D., McLeod, S.: Get answers: using student response systems to see students’ thinking. Learn. Lead. Technol. 32(4), 18–23 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konrad, M., Joseph, L.M., Itoi, M.: Using guided notes to enhance instruction for all students. Interv. School Clin. 46, 131–140 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kretlow, A.G., Cooke, N.L., Wood, C.L.: Using in-service and coaching to increase teachers’ accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial Spec. Educ. 33(6), 348–361 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lambert, M.C., Cartledge, G., Heward, W.L., Lo, Y.: Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding by fourth-grade urban students. J. Positive Behav. Interv. 8, 88–99 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Layng, T.V.J., Twyman, J.S.: Education + technology + innovation = learning? In: Murphy, M., Redding, S., Twyman, J. (Eds.) Handbook on Innovations in Learning, Center on Innovations in Learning, Temple University; Charlotte, NC, pp. 135–150. Information Age Publishing, Philadelphia (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, S.E.: Education as a human right in the 21st Century. Democracy Educ. 21(1), 1–9 (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mahon, K.: Creating a Content Strategy for Mobile Devices in the Classroom. Center on Innovations in Learning, Philadelphia (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neef, N.A., McCord, B.E., Ferreri, S.J.: Effects of guided notes versus completed notes during lecture on college students’ quiz performance. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 39, 123–130 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patterson, K.B.: Increasing positive outcomes for African American males in special education with the use of guided notes. J. Negro Educ. 74, 311–320 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schwab, J.R., Tucci, S., Jolivette, K.: Integrating schema-based instruction and response cards for student with learning disabilities and challenging behaviors. Beyond Behav. 22(3), 24–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skibo, H., Mims, P., Spooner, F.: Teaching number identification to students with severe disabilities using response cards. Educ. Train. Dev. Disabil. 46, 124–133 (2011)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhmud, V.A.: QUEST: the state accreditation of your university—bachelor, master, aspirant, specialty. Automatics Softw. Enginery 4(18), 128–148 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Novosibirsk State Technical UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk Institute of Program SystemsNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations