Advertisement

The Global Revival of Legisprudence: A Comparative View on Legislation in Legal Education and Research

  • Ittai Bar-Siman-TovEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Legisprudence Library book series (LEGIS, volume 5)

Abstract

This essay explores the revival of legisprudence as the field within legal studies that is dedicated to researching and teaching about the theory and practice of legislation. While arguing that we are witnessing a global revival of legisprudence, the essay focuses on a cross-Atlantic comparison of the field in the Unites States and in Europe. It explores the parallels, and differences, in the development of legisprudence/legislation in the Unites States and in Europe. This exploration challenges the perception that legisprudence is a new field, and argues that the field has deep and respectable historical roots, but that it has been largely abandoned for most of the twentieth century. It further examines the reasons for this neglect, as well as the reasons for the field’s recent revival since the end of the twentieth century. Finally, it explores the barriers, and potential, for a global cross-national development of the field of legisprudence.

Keywords

Legislation Legisprudence Legislative studies Science of legislation Legal education Legal scholarship 

Notes

Acknowledgements

For helpful comments on previous drafts I thank Rob van Gestel, and the participants of the International Conference on Legisprudence – Conceptions and Misconceptions of Legislation, at Zaragoza University School of Law, 22/24 February 2018. Many thanks as well to my dedicated team of research assistants: Daria Chill, Tair Samimi Golan, Yuval Shaki, Avichay Twig and Shani Wiersch.

References

  1. Aitken VE (2013) An exposition of legislative quality and its relevance for effective development. ProLaw Stud J 2:1–43Google Scholar
  2. Alemán E (2013) Latin American Legislative Politics: a survey of peer-reviewed publications in English. J Polit Lat Am 5(1):15–36Google Scholar
  3. Arter D (2006) Introduction: comparing the legislative performance of legislatures. J Legis Stud 12(3–4):245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barak-Erez D (2006) An international community of legislatures? In: Bauman RW, Kahana T (eds) The least examined branch: the role of legislatures in the constitutional State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 532–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bar-Siman-Tov I (2010) Lawmakers as lawbreakers. William Mary Law Rev 52:805–872Google Scholar
  6. Bar-Siman-Tov I (2015) Mending the legislative process – the preliminaries. Theory Pract Legis 3(3):245–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bar-Siman-Tov I (2016) The law of lawmaking. Tel Aviv Univ Law Rev “Iuney Mishpat” (Hebrew) 37:645–712Google Scholar
  8. Bar-Siman-Tov I (2017) Temporary legislation, better regulation, and experimentalist governance: an empirical study. Regul Gov.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bar-Siman-Tov I (2018) Legisprudence and the limits of legislation. Hukim - J Legis (Hebrew) 11:51Google Scholar
  10. Bauman RW, Kahana T (2006) New ways of looking at old institutions. In: Bauman RW, Kahana T (eds) The least examined branch: the role of legislatures in the constitutional State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beetham D (ed) (2006) Parliament and democracy in the twenty-first century: a guide to good practice. Inter-parliamentary Union, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentham J (1789) An introduction to the principles of morals. Athlone, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Bentham J (1817) Plan of parliamentary reform, in the form of catechism, with reasons for each article, with an introduction, shewing the necessity of radical, and the inadequacy of moderate, reform. R. Hunter, successor to Mr. Johnson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Bentham J (1843) An essay on political tactics or inquiries concerning the discipline and mode of proceeding proper to be observed in political assemblies: principally applied to the practice of the British parliament, and to the constitution and situation of the national assembly of France. In: Bowring J (ed) Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol 2. W. Tait, Edinburgh, pp 259–374Google Scholar
  15. Bignami F (2016) Introduction. A new field: comparative law and regulation. In: Bignami F, Zaring D (eds) Comparative law and regulation: understanding the global regulatory process. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Briffault RA (2003) Beyond congress: the study of state and local legislatures. J Legis Public Policy 7:23–30Google Scholar
  17. Brudney JJ (2015) Legislation and regulation in the core curriculum: a virtue or a necessity? J Leg Educ 65:3–45Google Scholar
  18. Bruhl AP (2003) Using statues to set legislative rules: entrenchment, separation of powers, and the rules of the proceedings clause. J Law Polit 19:345–416Google Scholar
  19. Burns JH (1984) Jeremy Bentham: from radical enlightenment to philosophic radicalism. Bentham Newsl 8:4–14Google Scholar
  20. Calabresi G (1982) A common law for the age of statutes. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrillo SR, Cordeiro ML (2016) Foundations for the development of rational law-making in Argentina. Theory Pract Legis 4(2):237–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carter R (2017) Legislation in Europe – a comprehensive guide for scholars and practitioners. Theory Pract Legis 5(2):201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang C (2013) Legisprudence in the Korean context: a practical approach focusing on the Confucian effects on rationality. In: Wintgens LJ, Oliver-Lalana AD (eds) The rationality and justification of legislation: essays in legisprudence. Springer, Cham, pp 63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen J (1947) On the teaching of legislation. Columbia Law Rev 47:1301–1312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cohen J (1950) Towards realism in legisprudence. Yale Law J 59:886–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cohen J (1983) Legisprudence: problems and agenda. Hofstra Law Rev 11(4):1163–1184Google Scholar
  27. Collins R (2014) Ask the author: Chief Judge Katzmann on statutory interpretation. SCOTUSblog. http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/10/ask-the-author-chief-judge-katzmann-on-statutory-interpretation
  28. Danner RA (1987) From the editor: books about statutes. Law Libr J 79:361–366Google Scholar
  29. de Paula F (2016) Does Brazil have a legislative policy? Theory Pract Legis 4(3):329–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. de Paula F (2017) Editorial. Theory Pract Legis 5(3):223–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dickerson R (1986) Toward a legal dialectic. Indiana Law J 61(3):315–330Google Scholar
  32. Dixon RE (2014) Thomas Jefferson: a lawyer’s path to a legal philosophy. In: Holowchak MA (ed) Thomas Jefferson and philosophy. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 15–40Google Scholar
  33. Drinóczi T (2015) Concept of quality in legislation—revisited: matter of perspective and a general overview. Statute Law Rev 36(3):211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Drinóczi T (2017) Quality control and management in legislation: a theoretical framework. KLRI (Korean Legislation Research Institute) J Law Legis 7(1):57–86Google Scholar
  35. Dror R (2011) Interview with Aharon Barak. Israel Bar Assoc J “Orech Ha-Din” 11:28–39Google Scholar
  36. Entrikin JL, Neumann RK (2017) Teaching the art and craft of drafting public law: statutes, rules, and more. Duquesne Law Rev 55:9–73Google Scholar
  37. Eskridge WN Jr (2003) The three ages of legislation pedagogy. NYU J Legis Public Policy 7(1):3–10Google Scholar
  38. Eskridge WN Jr, Frickey PP, Garrett E (1988) Cases and materials on legislation: statutes and the creation of public policy, 1st edn. West, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  39. Eskridge WN Jr, Frickey PP, Garrett E (2001) Cases and materials on legislation: statutes and the creation of public policy, 3rd edn. West, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  40. Eskridge WN Jr (1990) The new textualism. UCLA Law Rev 37(4):621–692Google Scholar
  41. Eskridge WN Jr, Frickey PP (1987) Legislation scholarship and pedagogy in the post-legal process era. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev 48(3):691–732Google Scholar
  42. Fitts MA (1988) Vices of virtue: a political party perspective on civic virtue reforms of the legislative process. Univ Pa Law Rev 136(6):1567–1646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Flückiger A (2009) Effectiveness: a new constitutional principle. Legislação: Cadernos de Ciência de Legislação 50:183–198Google Scholar
  44. Flückiger A (2010) Concluding remarks: can better regulation be achieved by guiding parliaments and governments? How the definition of the quality of legislation affects law improvement methods. Legisprudence 4(2):213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Frankfurter F (1947) Some reflections on the reading of statutes. Columbia Law Rev 47:527–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Frickey PP (1992) From the big sleep to the big heat: the revival of theory in statutory interpretation. Minn Law Rev 77:241–267Google Scholar
  47. Frickey PP (1996) Legislative processes and products. J Educ 46(4):469–477Google Scholar
  48. Frickey PP (1999) Revisiting the revival of theory in statutory interpretation: a lecture in honor of Irving Younger. Minn Law Rev 84(1):199–222Google Scholar
  49. Gac M (2015) The milestones of law in the area of central Europe 2014. Casta-Papernicka (Slovakia), 27/29 March 2014. Yearb Antitrust Regul Stud 8(11):290–289Google Scholar
  50. Garrett E (1999) Legal scholarship in the age of legislation. Tulsa Law J 34:679–698Google Scholar
  51. Garrett E (2003) Teaching law and politics. N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy 7(1):11–22Google Scholar
  52. Garrett E (2005) The purposes of framework legislation. J Contemp Leg Issues 14(2):717–766Google Scholar
  53. Garrett E (2008a) Legislation and statutory interpretation. In: Whittington KE, Kelemen RD, Caldiera GA (eds) The Oxford handbook of law and politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 360–379Google Scholar
  54. Garrett E (2008b) Framework legislation and federalism. Notre Dame Law Rev 83(4):1495–1539Google Scholar
  55. Gluck AR (2010) The states as laboratories of statutory interpretation: methodological consensus and the new modified textualism. Yale Law J 119(8):1750–1862Google Scholar
  56. Gluck AR (2015) The ripple effect of “Leg-Reg” on the study of legislation & administrative law in the law school curriculum. J Leg Educ 65:121–163Google Scholar
  57. Gluck AR, Schultz Bressman L (2013) Statutory interpretation from the inside—an empirical study of congressional drafting, delegation, and the canons: Part I. Stanford Law Rev 65(5):901–1026Google Scholar
  58. Gluck AR, Schultz Bressman L (2014) Statutory interpretation from the inside—an empirical study of congressional drafting, delegation, and the canons: Part II. Stanford Law Rev 66(4):725–802Google Scholar
  59. Goetz KH, Zubek R (2005) Law-making in Poland: rules and patterns of legislation. Ernst and Young Poland, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  60. He P (2014) Lawmaking in jurisprudence (I). In: Chinese lawmaking: from non-communicative to communicative. Springer, Cham, pp 89–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ismer R, Meßerschmidt K (2016) Evidence-based judicial review of legislation: some introductory remarks. Theory Pract Legis 4(2):91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Jackson VC (2015) Pro-constitutional representation: comparing the role obligations of judges and elected representatives in constitutional democracy. William Mary Law Rev 57:1717–1788Google Scholar
  63. Jefferson T (1801) A manual of parliamentary practice: composed originally for the use of the senate of the United States. Hogan and Thompson, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  64. Jellum LD (2015) The theories of statutory construction and legislative process in American jurisprudence. In: Araszkiewicz M, Płeszka K (eds) Logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking. Springer, Cham, pp 173–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Karpen U (2005) On the state of legislation studies in Europe. Eur J Law Reform 7:59–78Google Scholar
  66. Karpen U (2008) Instructions for law drafting. Eur J Law Reform 10:163Google Scholar
  67. Karpen U (2012) Comparative law: perspectives of legislation. Legisprudence 6(2):149–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Karpen U (2016) Efficacy, effectiveness, efficiency: from judicial to managerial rationality. In: Meßerschmidt K, Oliver-Lalana AD (eds) Rational lawmaking under review. Springer, Cham, pp 295–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Karpen U, Xanthaki H (2017) Legislation in Europe: a comprehensive guide for scholars and practitioners. Bloomsbury Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  70. Kavanaugh B (2016) Fixing statutory interpretation. Harv Law Rev 129(8):2118–2163Google Scholar
  71. Khusainov Z, Faatovich G, Khabibulina R, Faridovich Valiullin F (2016) Parliamentary responsibility as way of ensuring the lawmaking process. Turk Online J Design Art Commun 6:2493–2499Google Scholar
  72. Khusainova OV, Valiullin FF, Fomicheva OA (2016) Problems of formation and development of the lawmaking institute. J Econ Econ Educ Res 17:443–447Google Scholar
  73. Lahav P (2009) American moment[s]: when, how, and why did Israeli law faculties come to resemble elite US law schools? Theor Inq Law 10(2):653–697Google Scholar
  74. Landis JM (1934) reprinted in (1965) Statutes and the sources of law. Harv J Legis 2(1):7–40Google Scholar
  75. Leib E (2008) Adding legislation courses to the first-year curriculum. J Leg Educ 58(2):166–189Google Scholar
  76. Levi-Faur D (2004) Comparative research designs in the study of regulation: how to increase the number of cases without compromising the strengths of case-oriented analysis. In: Jordana J, Levi-Faur D (eds) The politics of regulation: institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 177–199Google Scholar
  77. Levine JM (2017) Fifth colonial frontier legal writing conference drafting statutes and rules: pedagogy, practice, and politics. Duquesne Law Rev 55(1):1–8Google Scholar
  78. Maanit C (2015) We are training innovative lawyers, the colleges are training regular attorneys. Globes. http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001057664. Accessed 8 Aug 2015
  79. Mader L (2001) Evaluating the effects: a contribution to the quality of legislation. Statute Law Rev 22(2):119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Mader L, de Almeida MT (eds) (2011) Quality of legislation: principles and instruments. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  81. Mańko R (2012) Quality of legislation following a transition from really existing socialism to capitalism: a case study of general clauses in Polish private law. In: Rozenfelds J (ed) The quality of legal acts and its importance in contemporary legal space. Latvia University Press, Riga, pp 540–561Google Scholar
  82. Manning JF (2010) Second-generation textualism. Calif Law Rev 98(4):1287–1318Google Scholar
  83. Manning JF, Stephenson M (2015) Legislation & regulation and reform of the first year. J Leg Educ 65:45–69Google Scholar
  84. Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm KW (2014) Introduction. In: Martin S, Saalfeld T, Strøm K (eds) The Oxford handbook of legislative studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–25Google Scholar
  85. Meulen DH (2013) The use of impact assessments and the quality of legislation. Theory Pract Legis 1(2):305–326Google Scholar
  86. Morisey M (2003) Liberating legal education from the judicial model. Seton Hall Legis J 27(2):231–274Google Scholar
  87. Mousmouti M (2012) Operationalising quality of legislation through the effectiveness test. Legisprudence 6(2):191–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Muylle KJ (2003) Improving the effectiveness of parliamentary legislative procedures. Statute Law Rev 24(3):169–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Newton BE (2012) The ninety-five theses: systemic reforms of American legal education and licensure. S C Law Rev 64(1):55–142Google Scholar
  90. Noll P (1973) Gesetzgebungslehre. Rohwolt, Reinbeck bei HamburgGoogle Scholar
  91. Nourse V (2012) A decision theory of statutory interpretation: legislative history by the rules. Yale Law J 122:70Google Scholar
  92. Nourse VF, Schacter JS (2002) The politics of legislative drafting: a congressional case study. N Y Univ Law Rev 77(3):575–624Google Scholar
  93. Oliver-Lalana AD, Meßerschmidt K (2016) On the ‘legisprudential turn’ in constitutional review: an introduction. In: Meßerschmidt K, Oliver-Lalana AD (eds) Rational lawmaking under review. Springer, Cham, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  94. Paulsen M (2001) Green eggs and legislation. Const Comment 18(1):1–4Google Scholar
  95. Perez O, Bar-Ilan J, Cohen R, Schreiber N (2019) The network of law reviews: citation cartels, scientific communities, and journal rankings. Mod Law Rev 81/82. (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  96. Pildes R (2003) The role of legislation in the field of public law. N Y Univ J Legis Public Policy 7(1):1–2Google Scholar
  97. Popelier P (2015) The role of courts in legislative policy diffusion and divergence. Theory Pract Legis 3(3):315–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Popelier P, De Jaegere J (2016) Evidence-based judicial review of legislation in divided states: the Belgian case. Theory Pract Legis 4(2):187–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Popkin WD (1999) Statutes in court: the history and theory of statutory interpretation. Duke University Press, Durham and LondonGoogle Scholar
  100. Posner RA (1983) Statutory interpretation—in the classroom and in the courtroom. Univ Chicago Law Rev 50(2):800–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Rose-Ackerman S, Egidy S, Fowkes J (2015) Due process of lawmaking: the United States, South Africa, Germany, and the European Union. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Roberts C, Roberts D, Bisson D (2016) A history of England, volume 2: 1688 to the present. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Rubin EL (2007) What’s wrong with Langdell’s method, and what to do about it. Vanderbilt Law Rev 60(2):609–666Google Scholar
  104. Rubin EL (2018) Statutory design as policy analysis. Harv J Legis 55(1):143–184Google Scholar
  105. Rudesill DS, Walker CJ, Tokaji DP (2015) A program in legislation. J Leg Educ 65(1):70–95Google Scholar
  106. Samuels A (2013) Ensuring standards in the quality of legislation. Statute Law Rev 34(3):296–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sandberg H (2010) Legal colonialism – Americanization of legal education in Israel. Global Jurist 10(2):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Scalia A (1997) A matter of interpretation: federal courts and the law. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  109. Sebba L (1995) Professor Tedeschi and ‘The jurisprudence of legislation’ – a voice in the wilderness. In: Englard Y et al (eds) In Memory of Guido Tedeschi. Hebrew University, Jerusalem, pp 535–562Google Scholar
  110. Seidman A, Seidman RB (2009) ILTAM: drafting evidence-based legislation for democratic social change. Boston Univ Law Rev 89(2):435–486Google Scholar
  111. Seuss D (1988) Green eggs and ham. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  112. Shannon BS (2016) Where have you gone, judicial process. Fordham Law Rev Res Gestae 84:24–30Google Scholar
  113. Sotomayor Trelles JE (2014) Introduction to lawmaking theory. http://es.scribd.com/doc/252211003/Law-making#scribd
  114. Stack KM (2015) Lessons from the turn of the twentieth century for first-year courses on legislation and regulation. J Leg Educ 65(1):6–16Google Scholar
  115. Stern M (2014) An exchange on the disqualification clause. Foreword. Quinnipiac Law Rev 33:i–viiGoogle Scholar
  116. Strauss PL (2016) Christopher Columbus Langdell and the public law curriculum. J Leg Educ 66(1):157–185Google Scholar
  117. Sutherland JG (1891) Statutes and statutory construction. Callaghan and Company, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  118. Uhlmann F (2011) Developments in the education of legislation and regulation: Germany and Switzerland. In: De opleiding van wetgevingsjuristen en wetgevingsonderzoekers in rechtsvergelijkend perspectief. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen, pp 43–60Google Scholar
  119. van Gestel R, Micklitz H-W, Rubin EL (eds) (2017) Rethinking legal scholarship: a transatlantic dialogue. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  120. Vermeule A (2004) The constitutional law of congressional procedure. Univ Chic Law Rev 71(2):361Google Scholar
  121. Vermeule A (2007) Mechanisms of democracy: institutional design writ small. Oxford University Press, USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Voermans WJM (2009) Concern about the quality of EU legislation: what kind of problem, by what kind of standards? Erasmus Law Rev 2(1):59–95Google Scholar
  123. Voermans WJM, Eijlander P (1999) Working out the fundamentals for a border crossing post-instrumental doctrine on legisprudence. In: Morand A (ed) Legistique formelle et materielle (Formal and material legistics). PUAM, Aix-en-Provence, pp 47–60Google Scholar
  124. Waldron J (1999a) The dignity of legislation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Waldron J (1999b) Law and disagreement. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Weiler J (2014) Still superficiality in legal education? What do the Deans say? HaMishpat (Hebrew) 19:39–78Google Scholar
  127. West R (2011) Toward the study of the legislated constitution. Ohio State Law J 72(6):1343–1366Google Scholar
  128. Widiss DA (2015) Making sausage: what, why and how to teach about legislative process in a legislation or leg-reg course. J Leg Educ 65(1):96–120Google Scholar
  129. Wintgens LJ (2006) Legisprudence as a new theory of legislation. Int J Educ Law Policy 2:85–100Google Scholar
  130. Wintgens LJ (2013) The rational legislator revisited. Bounded rationality and legisprudence. In: Wintgens LJ, Oliver-Lalana AD (eds) The rationality and justification of legislation. Springer, Cham, pp 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wintgens LJ, Oliver-Lalana AD (eds) (2013) The rationality and justification of legislation. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  132. Xanthaki H (2001) Problem of quality in EU legislation: what on earth is really wrong? Common Mark Law Rev 38(3):651–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Xanthaki H (2011) United Kingdom quality of legislation: an achievable universal concept or a utopian pursuit? In: Mader L, de Almeida MT (eds) Quality of legislation: principles and instruments. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Xanthaki H (2014a) Drafting legislation: art and technology of rules for regulation. Hart Publishing, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  135. Xanthaki H (2014b) European Union legislative quality after the Lisbon treaty: the challenges of smart regulation. Statute Law Rev 35(1):66–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Law, Bar-Ilan UniversityRamat-GanIsrael

Personalised recommendations