Advertisement

The Hip in Congenital Femoral Deficiency

  • Fergal Monsell
Chapter

Abstract

Abnormalities that affect the development of the human femur range from subtle differences that are of no functional or cosmetic consequence, to complete absence.

Involvement of the hip is invariable and advances in pediatric joint reconstruction in general, and hip reconstruction in particular has broadened the options available to affected individuals.

The condition of the hip is of primary importance in management decision-making and although the purpose of this chapter is to focus on the hip, an understanding and appreciation of all the associated abnormalities is also essential.

This chapter will concentrate on the pathophysiology and natural history of the hip in this condition and describe contemporary methods of surgical reconstruction, appropriate to this diagnosis.

Keywords

Congenital abnormality Hip Osteotomy Limb reconstruction External fixator 

References

  1. 1.
    Epps CH Jr. Proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65(6):867–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boden SD, Fallon MD, Davidson R, Mennuti MT, Kaplan FS. Proximal femoral focal deficiency. Evidence for a defect in proliferation and maturation of chondrocytes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(8):1119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    D'Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91(9):4082–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Therapontos C, Erskine L, Gardner ER, Figg WD, Vargesson N. Thalidomide induces limb defects by preventing angiogenic outgrowth during early limb formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(21):8573–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li D, Sakuma R, Vakili NA, Mo R, Puviindran V, Deimling S, et al. Formation of proximal and anterior limb skeleton requires early function of Irx3 and Irx5 and is negatively regulated by Shh signaling. Dev Cell. 2014;29(2):233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tao H, Kawakami Y, Hui CC, Hopyan S. The two domain hypothesis of limb prepattern and its relevance to congenital limb anomalies. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2017;6(4)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goddard NJ, Hashemi-Nejad A, Fixsen JA. Natural history and treatment of instability of the hip in proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1995;4(2):145–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fixsen JA, Lloyd-Roberts GC. The natural history and early treatment of proximal femoral dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1974;56(1):86–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aguilar JA, Paley D, Paley J, Santpure S, Patel M, Bhave A, et al. Clinical validation of the multiplier method for predicting limb length at maturity, part I. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(2):186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aguilar JA, Paley D, Paley J, Santpure S, Patel M, Herzenberg JE, et al. Clinical validation of the multiplier method for predicting limb length discrepancy and outcome of epiphysiodesis, part II. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(2):192–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aird JJ, Cheesman CL, Schade AT, Monsell FP. Validation of the multiplier method for leg-length predictions on a large European cohort and an assessment of the effect of physiological age on predictions. J Child Orthop. 2017;11(1):71–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paley J, Gelman A, Paley D, Herzenberg JE. The prenatal multiplier method for prediction of limb length discrepancy. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25(6):435–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oppenheim WSY, Fowler E. Overview and comparison of Syme’s amputa-tion and knee fusion with the van Nes rotationplasty procedure in proximal femoral focal deficiency. In: Herring JBJ, editor. The child with a limb deficiency. Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rogala EJ, Wynne-Davies R, Littlejohn A, Gormley J. Congenital limb anomalies:frequency and aetiological factors. Data from the Edinburgh register of the Newborn (1964-68). J Med Genet. 1974;11(3):221–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenz W, Feldmann U. Unilateral and asymmetric limb defects in man: delineation of the femur-fibula-ulna complex. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1977;13(1):269–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burn J, Winter RM, Baraitser M, Hall CM, Fixsen J. The femoral hypoplasia-unusual facies syndrome. J Med Genet. 1984;21(5):331–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Daentl DL, Smith DW, Scott CI, Hall BD, Gooding CA. Femoral hypoplasia--unusual facies syndrome. J Pediatr. 1975;86(1):107–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lampert RP. Dominant inheritance of femoral hypoplasia-unusual facies syndrome. Clin Genet. 1980;17(4):255–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pirani S, Beauchamp RD, Li D, Sawatzky B. Soft tissue anatomy of proximal femoral focal deficiency. J Pediatr Orthop. 1991;11(5):563–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Aitken GT. Amputation as a treatment for certain lower-extremity congenital abnormalities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41-A:1267–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pappas AM. Congenital abnormalities of the femur and related lower extremity malformations: classification and treatment. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3(1):45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hamanishi C. Congenital short femur. Clinical, genetic and epidemiological comparison of the naturally occurring condition with that caused by thalidomide. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62(3):307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sanpera I Jr, Sparks LT. Proximal femoral focal deficiency: does a radiologic classification exist? J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(1):34–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gillespie R, Torode IP. Classification and management of congenital abnormalities of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(5):557–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Torode IP, Gillespie R. Rotationplasty of the lower limb for congenital defects of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;65(5):569–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Torode IP, Gillespie R. The classification and treatment of proximal femoral deficiencies. Prosthetics Orthot Int. 1991;15(2):117–26.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paley D. Lengthening reconstruction surgery for congenital femoral deficiency. In: Herring JABJ, editor. The child with a limb deficiency. Rosemount, IL: AAOS; 1998. p. 113–32.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chitty LS, Altman DG, Henderson A, Campbell S. Charts of fetal size: 4. Femur length. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101(2):132–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abel DE, Hertzberg BS, James AH. Antenatal sonographic diagnosis of isolated bilateral fibular hemimelia. J Ultrasound Med. 2002;21(7):811–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Monteagudo A, Dong R, Timor-Tritsch IE. Fetal fibular hemimelia: case report and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25(4):533–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Uffelman J, Woo R, Richards DS. Prenatal diagnosis of bilateral fibular hemimelia. J Ultrasound Med. 2000;19(5):341–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hirose K, Koyanagi T, Hara K, Inoue M, Nakano H. Antenatal ultrasound diagnosis of the femur-fibula-ulna syndrome. J Clin Ultrasound. 1988;16(3):199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Filly AL, Robnett-Filly B, Filly RA. Syndromes with focal femoral deficiency: strengths and weaknesses of prenatal sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2004;23(11):1511–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mailath-Pokorny M, Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Mittal K, Konno F, Santos R. Prenatal diagnosis of unilateral proximal femoral focal deficiency at 19 weeks’ gestation: case report and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(5):594–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Grissom LE, Harcke HT. Sonography in congenital deficiency of the femur. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(1):29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bernaerts A, Pouillon M, De Ridder K, Vanhoenacker F. Value of magnetic resonance imaging in early assessment of proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD). JBR-BTR. 2006;89(6):325–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Maldjian C, Patel TY, Klein RM, Smith RC. Efficacy of MRI in classifying proximal focal femoral deficiency. Skelet Radiol. 2007;36(3):215–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Monsell FP, Bintcliffe FA, Evans C, Hughes R. Management of congenital femoral deficiency. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89(11):915–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ilizarov GA, Samchukov ML. Reconstruction of the femur by the Ilizarov method in the treatment of arthrosis deformans of the hip joint. Ortop Travmatol Protez. 1988;(6):10–3.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lorenz A. Ueber die Behandlung der irreponiblen ange-borenen Huftluxationen und der Schenkelhalspseudoarthrosen mittels Gabelung (Bifurkation des oberen Femurendes). Wien Klin Wchnschr. 1919;XXXII:997.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schanz A. Zur Behandlung der veralteten angeborenen Huftverrenkung. Munch Med Wchnschr. 1922;IXIX:930.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Brown KL. Resection, rotationplasty, and femoropelvic arthrodesis in severe congenital femoral deficiency. A report of the surgical technique and three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(1):78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fergal Monsell
    • 1
  1. 1.Bristol Children’s HospitalBristolUK

Personalised recommendations