Advertisement

The Big Meaning of Small Messages

  • Sakari TaipaleEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Here, instant messaging as a mode of everyday communication in digital families is taken up for examination. We look, in particular, into the qualities that make WhatsApp an attractive communication tool for extended families: it allows both one-to-one and one-to-many interactions and provides multiple modalities for intergenerational family communication (voice, text, photos and videos). Empirical evidence and qualitative data collected in Finland and Italy in 2014–2015 are drawn upon and analysed in advancing the argument that the success story of WhatsApp in the family context is related to way it enables reaching the whole family at once and promotes ‘phatic communion’ via small messages.

Keywords

Extended family Instant messaging Intergenerational relationships One-to-many communication Phatic communion WhatsApp 

References

  1. AudienceProject. (2016). Insights: Social media and Apps in the Nordics. Retrieved from https://www.audienceproject.com/wp-content/uploads/social_media_and_apps_nordics.pdf.
  2. Austin, G. C. (2017). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Consumption Markets & Culture, 20(3), 293–296.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, N. S. (2010). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Bouhnik, D., & Deshen, M. (2014). WhatsApp goes to school: Mobile instant messaging between teachers and students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 13, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, W., Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2002). The global villagers: Comparing internet users and uses around the world. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 74–113). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Church, K. & de Oliveira, R. (2014). What’s up with WhatsApp? Comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. MobileHCI’ 2013, August 27–30, 2013, Munich. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2493190.2493225.
  8. Stern, C. (2015). Messaging will be Facebook’s ‘next major wave of innovation and financial windfall. Business Insider Jun. 24, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.businessinsider.com/facebooks-next-big-profit-driver-is-messaging-2015-6?r=US&IR=T&IR=T.
  9. Eranti, V., & Lonkila, M. (2015). The social significance of the Facebook Like button. First Monday, 20(6). Retrieved  https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i6.5505.
  10. Fortunati, L., & Taipale, S. (2017). Mobile communication: Media effects. In P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), International encyclopedia of media effects (pp. 1241–1252). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & de Luca, F. (2013). What happened to body-to-body sociability? Social Science Research, 42(3), 893–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 21–30). New York, NY: ACM. Google Scholar
  14. Gurak, L. J. (2003). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hänninen, R., Taipale, S., & Korhonen, A. (2018). Refamilisation in the broadband society. The effects of ICTs on family solidarity in Finland. Journal of Family Studies. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1515101.
  16. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Horst, H. A. (2006). The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks, 6(2), 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johns, N. A. (2013). The social logics of sharing. The Communication Review, 16(3), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnston, M. J., King, D., Arora, S., Behar, N., Athanasiou, T., Sevdalis, N., et al. (2015). Smartphones let surgeons know WhatsApp: An analysis of communication in emergency surgical teams. The American Journal of Surgery, 209(1), 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karapanos, E., Teixeira, P., & Gouveia, R. (2016). Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: A case on Facebook and WhatsApp. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, part B, 888–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2001/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf.pdf.
  22. Lim, S. S. (Ed.). (2016). Mobile communication and the family. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Ling, R. (2007). Children, youth, and mobile communication. Journal of Children and Media, 1(1), 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ling, R., & Baron, N. S. (2007). Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26(3), 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ling, R., & Lai, C. H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media & Society, 13(3), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malinowski, B. (1923/1994). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In C.K. Ogden & I.A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (pp. 435–496). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, V. (2008). New media, networking and phatic culture. Convergence, 14(4), 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nag, W., Ling, R., & Jakobsen, M. H. (2016). Keep out! Join in! Cross-generation communication on the mobile internet in Norway. Journal of Children and Media, 10(4), 411–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nardi, B. A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: instant messaging in action. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 79–88). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  32. O’Hara, K., Massimi, M., Harpe, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014). Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 1131–1143). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  33. Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J. C., & Hampton, K. N. (2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 291–324). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ribak, R. (2009). Remote control, umbilical cord and beyond: The mobile phone as a transitional object. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2016). Beyond WhatsApp: Older people and smartphones. Revista Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 18(1), 27–47.Google Scholar
  37. Siibak, A., & Tamme, V. (2013). ‘Who introduced granny to Facebook?’: An exploration of everyday family interactions in web-based communication environments. Northern lights: Film & media studies yearbook, 11(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Statista. (2017). Number of monthly active WhatsApp users worldwide from April 2013 to December 2017. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/260819/number-of-monthly-active-whatsapp-users/.
  39. Taipale, S., & Farinosi, M. (2018). The Big Meaning of Small Messages: The Use of WhatsApp in Intergenerational Family Communication. In J. Zhou and G. Salvendy (Eds.): Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 532–546). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taipale, S., Petrovčič, A., & Dolničar, V. (2018). Intergenerational solidarity and ICT usage: Empirical insights from Finnish and Slovenian families In S. Taipale, T.-A.- Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 68–86). London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taloustutkimus. (2014). Social media survey for YLE. Retrieved from http://www.yle.fi/tvuutiset/uutiset/upics/liitetiedostot/yle_somekysely.pdf.
  42. Wilding, R. (2006). ‘Virtual’ intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts. Global Networks, 6(2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wittel, A. (2001). Toward a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 51–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations