Advertisement

Technological Drivers and Sociocultural Change

  • Sakari TaipaleEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, the suggestion is made that the relevance and timeliness of the concept of digital family is owing to certain advances in personal communication technologies that, together with wider social changes in the developed world, facilitate people’s participation in a digital society. First, we take a look at recent technological advancements in personal communication technology and social media applications, after which we examine more in-depth some of the major sociocultural transformations to have paved way for the emergence and rise of the digital family.

Keywords

Connected home Digital skills Family roles Infrastructure Internet history Mobile communication Personal communication 

References

  1. Alanen, L. (2009). Generational order. In J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, & M.-S. Honig (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 159–174). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Cardoso, G., Espanha, R., & Lapa, T. (2012). Family dynamics and mediation: Children, autonomy and control. In E. Loos, L. Haddon, & E. Mante-Meijer (Eds.), Generational use of new media (pp. 49–70). London & New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (2010). Rise of the network society. In The information age: Economy, society, and culture (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, L. S. (2013). The parent app: Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Correa, T. (2014). Bottom-up technology transmission within families: Exploring how youths influence their parents’ digital media use with dyadic data. Journal of Communication, 64(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Correa, T., Straubhaar, J. D., Spence, J., & Chen, W. (2015). Brokering new technologies: The role of children in their parents’ usage of the internet. New Media & Society, 17(4), 483–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Values Study. (2018). Atlas of European values. Retrieved from http://www.atlasofeuropeanvalues.eu/new/home.php?lang=en.
  9. Eynon, R., & Helsper, E. (2015). Family dynamics and internet use in Britain: What role do children play in adults’ engagement with the Internet? Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screenplay: Children and computing in the home. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fortunati, L., & Taipale, S. (2017). Mobilities and the network of personal technologies: Refining the understanding of mobility structure. Telematics and Informatics, 34(2), 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fortunati, L., Taipale, S., & de Luca, F. (2017). Digital generations, but not as we know them. Convergence. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517692309.
  13. Friemel, T. N. (2016). The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society, 18(2), 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gurak, L. J. (2003). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hämäläinen, R., De Wever, B., Malin, A., & Cincinnato, S. (2015). Education and working life: VET adults’ problem-solving skills in technology-rich environments. Computers & Education, 88, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hänninen, R., Taipale, S., &Korhonen, A. (2018). Refamilisation in the broadband society. The effects of ICTs on family solidarity in Finland. Journal of Family Studies. Advance online publication. doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2018.1515101.
  17. Hargittai, E., & Dobransky, K. (2017). Old dogs, new clicks: Digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Canadian Journal of Communication, 42(2), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2013). Distinct skill pathways to digital engagement. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 696–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in the information age. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ivan, G., Da Roit, B., & Knijn, T. (2014). Children first? Changing attitudes toward the primacy of children in five European countries. Journal of Family Issues, 36(4), 1982–2001.Google Scholar
  21. Khvorostianov, N. (2016). “Thanks to the internet, we remain a family”: ICT domestication by elderly immigrants and their families in Israel. Journal of Family Communication, 16(4), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kiesler, S., Zdaniuk, B., Lundmark, V., & Kraut, R. (2000). Troubles with the internet: The dynamics of help at home. Human-Computer Interaction, 15(4), 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuczynski, L., & De Mol, J. (2015). Dialectical models of socialization. In W. F. Overton, & P. C. M. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method. Volume 1 of the handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 326–368). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Lim, S. S., & Soon, C. (2010). The influence of social and cultural factors on mothers’ domestication of household ICTs—Experiences of Chinese and Korean women. Telematics and Informatics, 27(3), 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livingstone, S. (1998). Mediated childhoods: A comparative approach to young people’s changing media environment in Europe. European Journal of Communication, 13(4), 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livingstone, S., Mascheroni, G., Dreier, M., Chaudron, S., & Lagae, K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. LSE: London. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/media@lse/research/EUKidsOnline/Home.aspx.
  27. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2011). Mobile phone parenting: Reconfiguring relationships between Filipina migrant mothers and their left-behind children. New Media & Society, 13(3), 457–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Migration and new media: Transnational families and polymedia. London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martínez-Cantos, J. L. (2017). Digital skills gaps: A pending subject for gender digital inclusion in the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 32(5), 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelissen, S., & Van den Bulck, J. (2018). When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: Active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family. Information, Communication & Society, 21(3), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. OECD (2013) Country note survey of adults skills. First results. Finland. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/Country%20note%20-%20Finland.pdf.
  33. Park, H., & Lau, A. S. (2016). Socioeconomic status and parenting priorities: Child independence and obedience around the world. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(1), 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Petrovčič, A., Slavec, A., & Dolničar, V. (2018). The ten shades of silver: Segmentation of older adults in the mobile phone market. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(9), 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plowman, L., McPake, J., & Stephen, C. (2010). The technologisation of childhood? Young children and technology in the home. Children and Society, 24(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rideout, V., & Hamel, E. (2006). The media family: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers, preschoolers and their parents. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from https://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/7500.pdf.
  38. Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2016). Beyond WhatsApp: older people and smartphones. Revista Română de Comunicare şi Relaţii Publice, 18(1), 27–47.Google Scholar
  39. Siren, A., & Knudsen, S. G. (2017). Older adults and emerging digital service delivery: A mixed methods study on information and communications technology use, skills, and attitudes. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 29(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siibak, A., & Tamme, V. (2013). ‘Who introduced granny to Facebook?’: An exploration of everyday family interactions in web-based communication environments. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, 11(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Statistics Finland. (2017). Suomen virallinen tilasto (SVT): Väestön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/index.html.
  42. Taipale, S. & Farinosi, M. (2018). The big meaning of small messages: The use of WhatsApp in intergenerational family communication. In J. Zhou & G. Salvendy (Eds.): Human aspects of IT for the aged population 2018, lecture notes in computer science (pp. 532–546). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A., & Peters, O. (2012). Proposing a survey instrument for measuring operational, formal, information, and strategic internet skills. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 28(12), 827–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Deursen, A., & van Dijk, J. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. van Deursen, A. J., & van Dijk, J. A. (2015). Internet skill levels increase, but gaps widen: A longitudinal cross-sectional analysis (2010–2013) among the dutch population. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 782–797.Google Scholar
  47. Van Dijk, J. (2012). The network society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Venkatesh, A., Dunkle, D., & Wortman, A. (2011). Family life, children and the feminization of computing. In R. Harper (Ed.), The connected home: The future of domestic life (pp. 59–76). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Lauricella, A. R., & Connell, S. (2013). Parenting in the age of digital technology. Report for the center on media and Human development school of communication Northwestern University. Eveston, IL: Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://cmhd.northwestern.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ParentingAgeDigitalTechnology.REVISED.FINAL_.2014.pdf.
  50. Watt, D., & White, J. M. (1999). Computers and the family life: A family development perspective. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  51. Zhong, Z. J. (2011). From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 56(3), 736–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wilska, T.-A. & Kuoppamäki, S. (2018). Necessities to all? The role of ICTs in the everyday life of the middle-aged and elderly between 1999 and 2014. In S. Taipale, T.-A. Wilska, & C. Gilleard (Eds.), Digital technologies and generational identity: ICT usage across the life course (pp. 149–166). London & New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations