For Which Type of Students Does the Inverted Classroom Model Work Out?

An Empirical Analysis of Learning Success of Different Types of Students
  • Nadine Hagemus-BeckerEmail author
  • Ellen Roemer
  • Hartmut Ulrich
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 916)


Although the concept of inverted classroom has gained increasing attention in academic teaching, it is still unclear for which type of students inverted classroom models (ICM) really work out. The purpose of our study is to analyse the impact of ICM on the improvement of learning success for different student types. Therefore, our research provides answers to the following research questions: For which type of students does ICM really work out regarding their learning success? Whether and how far do ICM need to be adapted in order to meet the individual needs of heterogeneous student groups? An empirical study with 178 cases was conducted in four courses that have adopted ICM at an University of Applied Science in Germany. Based on five different learning behaviours, three different learning types were identified. Students showing particular learning behaviours need additional, but discriminative support for their learning success. The insights of this paper help to modify the concept of ICM so that it satisfies the needs of different types of learners.


Inverted classroom model Learning success Student types 


  1. 1.
    Strayer, J.F.: How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learn. Environ. Res. 15(2), 171–193 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bishop, J., Verleger, M.: The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai, C.-W., Shen, P.-D., Chiang, Y.-C., Lin, C.-H.: How to solve students’ problems in a flipped classroom: a quasi-experimental approach. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 16(1), 225–233 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Subramaniam, S.R., Muniandy, B.: The effect of flipped classroom on students’ engagement. Technol. Knowl. Learn., 1–18 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nouri, J.: The flipped classroom: for active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 13(1), 1–10 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Olakanmi, E.E.: The effects of a flipped classroom model of instruction on students’ performance and attitudes towards chemistry. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 26(1), 127–137 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, G.B.: Student perceptions of the Flipped Classroom (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boevé, A.J., et al.: Implementing the flipped classroom: an exploration of study behaviour and student performance. High. Educ. 74(6), 1015–1032 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Findlay-Thompson, S., Mombourquette, P.: Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. Bus. Educ. Accredit. 6(1), 63–71 (2014).
  10. 10.
    Flores, Ò., del-Arco, I., Silva, P.: The flipped classroom model at the university: analysis based on professors’ and students’ assessment in the educational field. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 13(1), 1–12 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., Cross, M.: The evidence for ‘flipping out’: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Educ. Today 38, 15–21 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Esperanza, P., Fabian, K., Toto, C.: Flipped Classroom Model: Effects on Performance, Attitudes and Perceptions in High School Algebra (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keck Frei, A., Thormann, G.: Begleitstudie Flipped Classroom ZHAW Informatik: Kurz-Zusammenfassung. Accessed 26 Feb 2018
  14. 14.
    Hwang, A., Arbaugh, J.B.: Seeking feedback in blended learning: competitive versus cooperative student attitudes and their links to learning outcome. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 25(3), 280–293 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keller, H., Beinborn, P., Boerner, S., Seeber, G.: Selbstgesteuertes Lernen im Fernstudium: Ergebnisse einer Studie an den AKAD Privathochschulen. Schriften der Wissenschaftlichen Hochschule Lahr, no. 5 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lage, M.J., Platt, G.J., Treglia, M.: Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J. Econ. Educ. 31(1), 30–43 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNally, B., et al.: Flipped classroom experiences: student preferences and flip strategy in a higher education context. High. Educ. 73(2), 281–298 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blair, E., Maharaj, C., Primus, S.: Performance and perception in the flipped classroom. Educ. Inf. Technol. 21(6), 1465–1482 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., Chrisochoides, N.: Making sense of video analytics: lessons learned from clickstream interactions, attitudes, and learning outcome in a video-assisted course. IRRODL 16(1) (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine Hagemus-Becker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ellen Roemer
    • 1
  • Hartmut Ulrich
    • 1
  1. 1.Hochschule Ruhr WestMülheim an der RuhrGermany

Personalised recommendations