Advertisement

Analyzing Scientific Corpora Using Word Embedding

  • Veronica Segarra-FaggioniEmail author
  • Audrey Romero-Pelaez
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 918)

Abstract

The bibliographic databases have abstract and citations of scientific articles, the summary being the most consulted section of an article. In order to classify and address the entries in a system of indexing and retrieval of information in the databases of a manuscript, there are keywords, which in many cases this information should not achieve greater dissemination. This paper presents an evaluation of the semantic relatedness between the abstract of scientific papers and their keywords. This analysis will be using word2vec that is a predictive model, and it will find the nearest words. Thus, this study is focused on the metadata quality assessment through the similar semantics between two words that allow the accuracy in relation to metadata of scientific databases.

Keywords

Word embedding Word2vec Accuracy Natural language processing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research team would like to thank Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, especially to Tecnologías Avanzadas de la Web y SBC Group.

References

  1. 1.
    Yih, W., Zweig, G., Platt, J.C.: Polarity inducing latent semantic analysis. In: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 1212–1222 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, CoRR, vol. abs/1301.3 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yan, E., Zhu, Y.: Tracking word semantic change in biomedical literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 109, 76–86 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferrone, L., Zanzotto, F.M.: A symbolic, distributed and distributional representations for natural language processing in the era of deep learning: a survey (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg, Y.: A primer on neural network models for natural language processing. JAIR 57, 345–420 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deerwest, S.T., Dumais, G.W., Furnas, T.K., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41, 1212–1222 (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mikolov, T., Le, Q.V., Sutskever, I.: Exploiting Similarities among Languages for Machine Translation, CoRR, vol. abs/1309.4 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Romero Pelaez, A., Segarra-Faggioni, V., Alarcon, P.P.: Exploring the provenance and accuracy as metadata quality metrics in assessment resources of OCW repositories. In: ICETC 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baroni, M., Dinu, G., Kruszewski, G.: Don’t count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO 25000 software product quality. http://iso25000.com/index.php/en/iso-25000-standards/iso-25012. Accessed 01 Apr 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Veronica Segarra-Faggioni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Audrey Romero-Pelaez
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Técnica Particular de LojaLojaEcuador

Personalised recommendations