Advertisement

Autonomous Cycles of Collaborative Processes for Integration Based on Industry 4.0

  • Cindy-Pamela LopezEmail author
  • Marco Santórum
  • Jose Aguilar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 918)

Abstract

The industrial process continues its evolution based on the growing technological advances, which provide improvements in production and the satisfaction of environmental needs. The more recent evolution is known as the Industry 4.0 paradigm. In this context, organizations have seen the need to create digital ecosystems and alliances as a competitive strategy. However, there are many aspects to overcome in order to achieve an effective collaboration between organizations with different functions. Some of them are about how to establish collaborative processes, how to identify the possibilities of the contribution of each company, and how to establish functions, responsibilities, and the optimal coordination between them. In light of this situation, we propose a collaborative model for integrating organizations, based on Autonomous Cycles of Data Analysis Tasks, which are self-adaptive to satisfy the changing customer’s needs. All this will be made possible by making intensive use of “Everything mining”, and new technologies.

Keywords

Business processes Industry 4.0 Collaborative processes Virtual organizations Autonomic computing 

References

  1. 1.
    Eberhard, B., Podio, M., Pérez, A., Radovica, E., Avotina, L., Peiseniece, L., Sendon, M.C., Lozano, A.G., Solé-pla, J.: Smart work: the transformation of the labour market due to the fourth industrial revolution. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Sci. Appl. Res. 10, 47–66 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mo, Q., Dai, F., Zhu, R., Da, J., Lin, L., Li, T.: A distributed business process collaboration architecture based on entropy in cloud computing. In: International Conference on Cloud Computing, vol. 1, pp. 126–134 (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costache, A., Popa, C., Dobrescu, T., Cotet, C.: The gap between the knowledge of virtual enterprise actor and knowledge demand of Industry 4.0. In: 28th Daaam International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, pp. 0743–0749, February 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baicu, A.V.: Methods of assessment and training of a company towards the enterprise 4.0. In: 28th Daaam International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, pp. 1065–1073 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wee, D., Kelly, R., Cattel, J., Breunig, M.: Industry 4.0 - how to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector. Technical report (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bullinger, H.J., Neuhüttler, J., Nägele, R., Woyke, I.: Collaborative development of business models in smart service ecosystems. In: 2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET) (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papa, M., Kaselautzke, D., Radinger, T., Stuja, K.: Development of a safety Industry 4.0 production environment. In: 28th Daaam International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, Austria, pp. 981–987 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trantopoulos, K., Krogh, G.V., Wallin, M.W., Woerter, M.: External knowledge and information technology. MisQuarterly 41(1), 287–300 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roja, A., Nastase, M., Valimareanu, I.M.: Collaborative networks and strategic axes. Fundamental pillars of the development of technology entrepreneurial ecosystems. Rev. Int. Comp. Manag. 15(5), 579 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nikolic, B., Ignjatic, J., Suzic, N., Stevanov, B., Rikalovic, A.: Predictive manufacturing systems in Industry 4.0: trends, benefits and challenges. In: 28th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, pp. 796–803 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baldassari, P., Roux, J.: Industry 4.0: preparing for the future of work (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B., Werner, F., Ivanova, M.: A dynamic model and an algorithm for short-term supply chain scheduling in the smart factory Industry 4.0. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54(2), 386–402 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kanth, L.: Automation development through robot cells in lean manufacturing system. Airo Int. Res. J. XV, 63012 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    André, S., Elgh, F.: Creating an ability to respond to changing requirements by systematic modelling of design assets and processes. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), pp. 196–200 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aguilar, J., Cordero, J., Buendía, O.: Specification of the autonomic cycles of learning analytic tasks for a smart classroom. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 38 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aguilar, J., Buendia, O., Moreno, K., Mosquera, D.: Autonomous cycle of data analysis tasks for learning processes. In: Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 658 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitchenham, B.A.: Systematic review in software engineering - where we are and where we should be going. In: EAST 2012 Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt, R., Möhring, M., Härting, R.C., Reichstein, C., Neumaier, P., Jozinović, P.: Industry 4.0 - potentials for creating smart products: empirical research results. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 208, pp. 16–27 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kidanu, S., Cardinale, Y., Tekli, G., Chbeir, R.: A multimedia-oriented digital ecosystem: a new collaborative environment. In: 2015 IEEE/ACIS 14th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS) (2015)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, E.A.: Cyber physical systems: design challenges. Technical report (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Robla-Gomez, S., Becerra, V.M., Llata, J.R., Gonzalez-Sarabia, E., Torre-Ferrero, C., Perez-Oria, J.: Working together: a review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access 5, 26754–26773 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Charbonnaud, P., Zbib, N., Archimede, B.: Interoperability service utility model and its simulation for improving the business process collaboration. In: Proceedings of the I-ESA Conferences on Enterprise Interoperability V, London. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Andres, B., Sanchis, R., Poler, R., Saari, L.: Collaborative calculation of the materials requirement planning in the automotive industry. In: Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation: Engineering, Technology and Innovation Management Beyond 2020: New Challenges, New Approaches, ICE/ITMC 2017, January 2018, pp. 496–503 (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedl, A.: Meeting Industrie 4.0 challenges with S-BPM. In: S-BPM One 2018 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Subject-Oriented Business Process Management, April, pp. 1–6 (2018)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Quinones, H., Yang, Y.: Intelligent automation; key factor for high mix manufacturing. In: 2017 International Conference on Electronics Packaging, ICEP 2017, pp. 308–311 (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alexakos, C., Kalogeras, A.: Exposing MES functionalities as enabler for cloud manufacturing. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, WFCS (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., Zhang, C.: Towards smart factory for Industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput. Netw. 101, 158–168 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vizcarrondo, J., Aguilar, J., Exposito, E., Subia, A.: MAPE-K as a service-oriented architecture. IEEE Lat. Am. Trans. 15(6), 1163–1175 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cindy-Pamela Lopez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marco Santórum
    • 1
  • Jose Aguilar
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Informática y Ciencias de la ComputaciónEscuela Politécnica NacionalQuitoEcuador
  2. 2.CEMISIDUniversidad de Los AndesMeridaVenezuela

Personalised recommendations