Advertisement

Conceptual Model for Software as a Service (SaaS) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems Adoption in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (SMEs) Using the Technology-Organization-Environment (T-O-E) Framework

  • Jose ValdebenitoEmail author
  • Aldo Quelopana
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 918)

Abstract

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems under a Software as a Service (SaaS) model are being established as a viable solution for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs). These systems are a great opportunity for SMEs because they obtain the benefits of an ERP system without maintenance and investment costs associated with on-premise models. Since SaaS ERP systems success involves their adoption, it is important to know the factors influencing their adoption in the context of SMEs. Based on a literature review, a conceptual adoption model is proposed using the Technological, Organizational, and Environmental (TOE) framework consisting of the following factors: perceived value, security concerns, configurability and customization, organizational readiness, top management support, competitive pressure, and vendor qualities.

Keywords

SaaS ERP TOE Technology adoption 

References

  1. 1.
    Lewandowski, J., Salako, A.O., Garcia-Perez, A.: SaaS enterprise resource planning systems: challenges of their adoption in SMEs. In: 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), pp. 56–61. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan Huang, S., Huang, S.M., Wu, T.H., Lin, W.K.: Process efficiency of the enterprise resource planning adoption. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 109(8), 1085–1100 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, C.C., Law, C.C., Yang, S.C.: Managing ERP implementation failure: a project management perspective. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 56(1), 157–170 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahmud, I., Ramayah, T., Kurnia, S.: To use or not to use: modelling end user grumbling as user resistance in pre-implementation stage of enterprise resource planning system. Inf. Syst. (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saade, R.G., Nijher, H.: Critical success factors in enterprise resource planning implementation: a review of case studies. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 29(1), 72–96 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Seethamraju, R.: Adoption of software as a service (SaaS) enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs). Inf. Syst. Front. 17(3), 475–492 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mangiuc, D.M.: Enterprise 2.0-is the market ready? Account. Manage. Inf. Syst./Contabilitate si Informatica de Gestiune 10(4) (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peng, G.C.A., Gala, C.: Cloud ERP: a new dilemma to modern organisations? J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 54(4), 22–30 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haselmann, T., Vossen, G.: Software-as-a-service in small and medium enterprises: an empirical attitude assessment. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, pp. 43–56. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rogers, E.M.: The Diffusion of Innovation, 5th Edition (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tornatzky, L., Fleischer, M.: The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Valdebenito, J., Quelopana, A.: Understanding the landscape of research in enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems adoption, pp. 35–39 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenart, A.: ERP in the cloud–benefits and challenges. In: Research in Systems Analysis and Design: Models and Methods, pp. 39–50 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venkatachalam, N., Fielt, E., Rosemann, M., Mathews, S.: Small and medium enterprises sourcing software as a service-a dynamic perspective on is capabilities. Assoc. Inf. Sys. 7, 15–2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mell, P., Grance, T., et al.: The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Awa, H.O., Ojiabo, O.U.: A model of adoption determinants of ERP within T-O-E framework. Inf. Technol. People 29(4), 901–930 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Oliveira, T., Martins, M.F.: Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Eval. 14(1), 110–121 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rondan-Cataluña, F.J., Arenas-Gaitán, J., Ramírez-Correa, P.E.: A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models: a non-linear perspective. Kybernetes 44(5), 788–805 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gangwar, H., Date, H., Raoot, A.: Review on IT adoption: insights from recent technologies. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 27(4), 488–502 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhu, K., Kraemer, K.L., Dedrick, J.: Information technology payoff in e-business environments: an international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21(1), 17–54 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pan, M.J., Jang, W.Y.: Determinants of the adoption of enterprise resource planning within the technology-organization-environment framework: Taiwan’s communications industry. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 48(3), 94–102 (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ilin, V., Ivetic, J., Simic, D.: Understanding the determinants of e-business adoption in ERP-enabled firms and non-ERP-enabled firms: a case study of the Western Balkan Peninsula. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 125, 206–223 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haberli Jr., C., Oliveira, T., Yanaze, M.: Understanding the determinants of adoption of enterprise resource planning (ERP) technology within the agri-food context: the case of the Midwest of Brazil. Int. Food Agribusiness Manag. Rev. 20(5), 729–746 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Awa, H.O., Uko, J.P., Ukoha, O.: An empirical study of some critical adoption factors of ERP software. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 33(8), 609–622 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Melão, N., Loureiro, J.: ERP in the education sector: evidence from Portuguese non-higher education institutions. In: World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 592–602. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Low, C., Chen, Y., Wu, M.: Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 111(7), 1006–1023 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alkhalil, A., Sahandi, R., John, D.: An exploration of the determinants for decision to migrate existing resources to cloud computing using an integrated TOE-DOI model. J. Cloud Comput. 6(1), 2 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Espadanal, M.: Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: an analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Inf. Manag. 51(5), 497–510 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Masana, N., Muriithi, G.M.: Investigating TOE factors affecting the adoption of a cloud-based EMR system in the free-state, South Africa. In: International Conference on Emerging Technologies for Developing Countries, pp. 233–238. Springer (2017)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Priyadarshinee, P., Raut, R.D., Jha, M.K., Gardas, B.B.: Understanding and predicting the determinants of cloud computing adoption: a two staged hybrid SEM-neural networks approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 76, 341–362 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hsu, C.L., Lin, J.C.C.: Factors affecting the adoption of cloud services in enterprises. Inf. Syst. e-Bus. Manag. 14(4), 791–822 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Şener, U., Gökalp, E., Eren, P.E.: Cloud-based enterprise information systems: determinants of adoption in the context of organizations. In: International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, pp. 53–66. Springer (2016)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salum, K.H., Rozan, M.Z.A.: Conceptual model for cloud ERP adoption for SMEs. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 95(4), 743 (2017)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bhatia, S.S., Gupta, V.: Principles and practices for the implementation of cloud based ERP in SMEs. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 57. EDP Sciences (2016)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kinuthia, J.N.: Technological, organizational, and environmental factors affecting the adoption of cloud enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. Ph.D. thesis, Eastern Michigan University (2014)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    AlBar, A.M., Hoque, M.R.: Determinants of cloud ERP adoption in Saudi Arabia: an empirical study. In: 2015 International Conference on Cloud Computing (ICCC), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gangwar, H., Date, H., Ramaswamy, R.: Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 28(1), 107–130 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Awa, H.O., Ojiabo, O.U., Orokor, L.E.: Integrated technology-organization-environment (TOE) taxonomies for technology adoption. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 30(6), 893–921 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee, J.: Discriminant analysis of technology adoption behavior: a case of internet technologies in small businesses. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 44(4), 57–66 (2004)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Alshamaila, Y., Papagiannidis, S., Li, F.: Cloud computing adoption by SMEs in the north east of England: a multi-perspective framework. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 26(3), 250–275 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Martins, R., Oliveira, T., Thomas, M.A.: An empirical analysis to assess the determinants of saas diffusion in firms. Comput. Hum. Behav. 62, 19–33 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Borgman, H.P., Bahli, B., Heier, H., Schewski, F.: Cloudrise: exploring cloud computing adoption and governance with the TOE framework. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4425–4435. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lal, P., Bharadwaj, S.S.: Understanding the impact of cloud-based services adoption on organizational flexibility: an exploratory study. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 29(4), 566–588 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Awa, H.O., Ukoha, O., Emecheta, B.C.: Using TOE theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution. Cogent Bus. Manage. 3(1), 1196571 (2016)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ramdani, B., Kawalek, P., Lorenzo, O.: Predicting SMEs’ adoption of enterprise systems. J. Enterp. Inf. Manage. 22(1/2), 10–24 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Faasen, J., Seymour, L.F., Schuler, J.: SaaS ERP adoption intent: explaining the South African SME perspective. In: Enterprise Information Systems of the Future, pp. 35–47. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lian, J.W., Yen, D.C., Wang, Y.T.: An exploratory study to understand the critical factors affecting the decision to adopt cloud computing in Taiwan hospital. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 34(1), 28–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lechesa, M., Seymour, L., Schuler, J.: ERP software as service (SaaS): factors affecting adoption in South Africa. In: Re-Conceptualizing Enterprise Information Systems, pp. 152–167. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mcsi, M.: Configurability in SaaS (software as a service) applications. In: Proceedings of 2nd Annual Conference on India Software Engineering Conference, pp. 19–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Guo, P.: A survey of software as a service delivery paradigm. In: TKK T-110.5190 Seminar on Internetworking (2009)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    DeSisto, R.: Software as a Service: Uncertainties Revealed. Gartner Research (2009)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Young, R., Jordan, E.: Top management support: mantra or necessity? Int. J. Project Manage. 26(7), 713–725 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yang, Z., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y.: Understanding SaaS adoption from the perspective of organizational users: a tripod readiness model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 254–264 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    van de Weerd, I., Mangula, I.S., Brinkkemper, S.: Adoption of software as a service in Indonesia: examining the influence of organizational factors. Inf. Manage. 53(7), 915–928 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Católica del NorteAntofagastaChile

Personalised recommendations