Advertisement

An Innovative Approach to Involve Students with Learning Disabilities in Intelligent Learning Systems

  • Fatimaezzahra BenmarrakchiEmail author
  • Nihal Ouherrou
  • Oussama Elhammoumi
  • Jamal El Kafi
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 914)

Abstract

Innovations in healthcare education have fostered the development of assistive technologies which have contributed to making the learning environment and information more accessible to learners with learning difficulties. Especially, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) have proven the benefits of personalized learning. One of the distinctive features of the intelligent system is its Learner Model (LM). In this paper, we propose a LM that takes into consideration individual differences and tends to adapt system parameters for learners with Specific Learning Disabilities (SLDs) before the session begins. The purpose of this research is the development of conceptual bases and a constructional approach of a cognitive LM founded on differentiation. However, developing ITS requires many resources and information about learners as well as it demands a long time to build. To facilitate the design process, we propose a LM, called UPCLEE that takes into account several dimensions of learner’s profile. This research demonstrates how the proposed model’s levels are taken into account in the design of ITS and how it can be used to provide personalization in computer-based educational systems. In this study, we collected observations, interviews, and surveys and we used a grounded theory approach to develop our LM, then we conducted a user study with 12 students (4 with SLDs) to validate our proposed model.

Keywords

Healthcare education Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Specific Learning Disabilities (SLDs) Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) User experience Learner Model (LM) 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was financially supported by an Excellence Grant accorded to Fatimaezzahra Benmarrakchi (2UCD2015), Nihal Ouherrou (3UCD2018) and to Oussama El Hammoumi (11UAE2017) by the National Center of Scientific and Technical Research (CNRST)-Minister of National Education, Higher Education, Staff Training and Scientific Research, Morocco.

The authors are grateful to the children who participated in this study, as well as their parents. The authors would like to acknowledge the president and staff at Speech-Language Pathology Service-Health center, El Jadida Morocco. The authors are also thankful to the speech therapist Ilham ELhousni for her valuable suggestions and recommendations.

References

  1. 1.
    Peterson, R.L., Pennington, B.F.: Developmental dyslexia. Lancet 379(9830), 1997–2007 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60198-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kah, A.E., Lakhouaja, A.: Developing effective educative games for Arabic children primarily dyslexics. Educ. Inf. Technol. 1–20 (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madeira, J., Silva, C., Marcelino, L., Ferreira, P.: Assistive mobile applications for dyslexia. Procedia Comput. Sci. 64, 417–424 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benmarrakchi, F., Kafi, J.E., Elhore, A.: Supporting dyslexic’s learning style preferences in adaptive virtual learning environment. In: 2016 International Conference on Engineering MIS (ICEMIS), pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Assistive E-Learning System for the Learning Disabled - ScienceDirect. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050915003750. Accessed 09 Mar 2017
  6. 6.
    Benmarrakchi, F., Kafi, J.E., Elhore, A., Haie, S.: Exploring the use of the ICT in supporting dyslexic students’ preferred learning styles: a preliminary evaluation. Educ. Inf. Technol. 1–19 (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldstein, I.P.: The genetic graph: a representation for the evolution of procedural knowledge. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 11(1), 51–77 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papatheocharous, E., Belk, M., Germanakos, P., Samaras, G.: Towards implicit user modeling based on artificial intelligence, cognitive styles and web interaction data. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools 23(02), 1440009 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuschieri, T., Khaled, R., Farrugia, V.E., Martinez, H.P., Yannakakis, G.N.: The iLearnRW game: support for students with Dyslexia in class and at home. In: 2014 6th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES), pp. 1–2 (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benmarrakchi, F.E., Kafi, J.E., Elhore, A.: User modeling approach for dyslexic students in virtual learning environments. Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput. IJCAC 7(2), 1–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Frias-Martinez, E., Magoulas, G., Chen, S., Macredie, R.: Modeling human behavior in user-adaptive systems: recent advances using soft computing techniques. Expert Syst. Appl. 29(2), 320–329 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Kolb, A.Y., Kolb, D.A.: Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ. 4(2), 193–212 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felder, R.M., Silverman, L.K.: Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Eng. Educ. 78(7), 674–681 (1988)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fleming, N.D., Mills, C.: Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Exley, S.: The effectiveness of teaching strategies for students with dyslexia based on their preferred learning styles. Br. J. Spec. Educ. 30(4), 213–220 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Witkin, H.A.: Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures*. J. Pers. 19(1), 1–15 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin, T., et al.: Cognitive trait model for persistent student modelling. Presented at the EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology, vol. 2003, pp. 2144–2147 (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graf, S., Liu, T.-C., Kinshuk, Chen, N.-S., Yang, S.J.H.: Learning styles and cognitive traits – their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(6), 1280–1289 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Benmarrakchi, F., Kafi, J.E., Hore, A.E.: A different learning way for pupils with specific learning disabilities. Int. J. Comput. Technol. 14(10), 6157–6162 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spelling in Adolescents With Dyslexia: Errors and Modes of Assessment - Wim Tops, Maaike Callens, Evi Bijn, Marc Brysbaert (2014). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022219412468159. Accessed 05 Feb 2018
  22. 22.
    Martin, J., Colé, P., Leuwers, C., Casalis, S., Zorman, M., Sprenger-Charolles, L.: Reading in French-speaking adults with dyslexia. Ann. Dyslexia 60(2), 238–264 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yin, W.G., Weekes, B.S.: Dyslexia in Chinese: clues from cognitive neuropsychology. Ann. Dyslexia 53(1), 255–279 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Benmarrakchi, F., Kafi, J.E., Elhore, A.: Communication technology for users with specific learning disabilities. Procedia Comput. Sci. 110, 258–265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience | Interacting with Computers | Oxford Academic. https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-abstract/22/5/353/684432. Accessed 08 Feb 2018
  26. 26.
    Cano, S., Arteaga, J.M., Collazos, C.A., Amador, V.B.: Model for analysis of serious games for literacy in deaf children from a user experience approach. In: Proceedings of the XVI International Conference on Human Computer Interaction, New York, NY, USA, pp. 18:1–18:9 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentChouaib Doukkali UniversityEl JadidaMorocco

Personalised recommendations