Advertisement

Complexity Theory in the Advancement of Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Research: Future Research Directions

  • Zeynab Aeeni
  • Mehrzad SaeedikiyaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/1)

Abstract

The underlying principles of complexity theory has been disused in “five dimensions of non-linear interactions between agents and components”, “hierarchical nature of the system”, “emergence”, “co-evolutionary order creation”, and “self-organization”. The rationale for considering entrepreneurship ecosystem as a complex system has been presented. Then, the application of complexity theory for the study of entrepreneurship ecosystem and future research directions have been comprehensively discussed. The paper contributes to the entrepreneurship research with its emphasis on the application of complexity theory as a new line of reasoning for the study of entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship ecosystem Complexity theory Complex system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Both authors have contributed equally to the work. The authors are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the early draft of the paper.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Szerb, L. (2014). The continued search for the Solow residual: The role of national entrepreneurial ecosystem. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 8652. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/10419/106598
  2. Acs, Z., Szerb, L., & Autio, E. (2015). The global entrepreneurship and development index. In Z. Acs, L. Szerb, & E. Autio (Eds.), Global entrepreneurship and development index 2014 (pp. 39–64). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. (1999). Perspective: Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 216–232.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, A. R., Drakopoulou Dodd, S., & Jack, S. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship as connecting: Some implications for theorizing and practice. Management Decision, 50(5), 958–971.Google Scholar
  5. Arruda, C., Nogueira, V. S., & Costa, V. (2013). The Brazilian entrepreneurial ecosystem of startups: An analysis of entrepreneurship determinants in Brazil as seen from the OECD pillars. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 2(3), 17–57.Google Scholar
  6. Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (1999). Harnessing complexity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  8. Benbya, H., & McKelvey, B. (2006). Toward a complexity theory of information systems development. Information Technology and People, 19(1), 12–34.Google Scholar
  9. Bernardez, M., & Mead, M. (2009). The power of entrepreneurial ecosystems: Extracting boom from bust. PII Review, 2(2), 12–45.Google Scholar
  10. Breslin, D. (2008). A review of the evolutionary approach to the study of entrepreneurship. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 399–423.Google Scholar
  11. Bygrave, W. D. (1989). The entrepreneurship paradigm (II): Chaos and catastrophes among quantum jumps. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(2), 7–30.Google Scholar
  12. Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13–22.Google Scholar
  13. Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T. A., & Grove, J. M. (2006). Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: Heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecological Complexity, 3(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  14. Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001). Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: Control versus emergence. Journal of Operations Management, 19(3), 351–366.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, M. (1999). Commentary on the organization science special issue on complexity. Organization Science, 10(3), 373–376.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  17. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–100.Google Scholar
  18. Fetters, M., Greene, P. G., & Rice, M. P. (Eds.). (2010). The development of university-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Global practices. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Foster, G., & Shimizu, C. (2013). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and company growth dynamics. Cologny: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  20. Frenken, K. (2006). Technological innovation and complexity theory. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(2), 137–155.Google Scholar
  21. Fuerlinger, G., Fandl, U., & Funke, T. (2015). The role of the state in the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Insights from Germany. Triple Helix, 2(1), 3.Google Scholar
  22. Fuller, T., & Moran, P. (2001). Small enterprises as complex adaptive systems: A methodological question? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 13(1), 47–63.Google Scholar
  23. Fuller, T., Warren, L., & Argyle, P. (2008). Sustaining entrepreneurial business: A complexity perspective on processes that produce emergent practice. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  24. Goldstein, J. (1999). Emergence as a construct: History and issues. Emergence, 1(1), 49–72.Google Scholar
  25. Goldstein, J. A., Hazy, J. K., & Silberstang, J. (2008). Complexity and social entrepreneurship: A fortuitous meeting. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 10(3), 9–24.Google Scholar
  26. Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading: Perseus.Google Scholar
  27. Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. [ebook] Bobson Global. Accessed February 1, 2017, from http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/The-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-for-economic-growth-policy-20110620183915.pdf
  28. Kantis, H., & Federico, J. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in Latin America: The role of policies. [ebook] Accessed November 18, 2016, from http://www.kauffman.org/~/media/kauffman_org/z_archive/resource/2012/5/irpr_2012_kantis.pdf
  29. Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kay, J. J., & Schneider, E. (1994). Embracing complexity: The challenge of the ecosystem approach. Alternatives Journal, 20(3), 32.Google Scholar
  31. Kay, J. J., Regier, H. A., Boyle, M., & Francis, G. (1999). An ecosystem approach for sustainability: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures, 31(7), 721–742.Google Scholar
  32. Kline, C., Hao, H., Alderman, D., Kleckley, J. W., & Gray, S. (2014). A spatial analysis of tourism, entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial ecosystem in North Carolina, USA. Tourism Planning and Development, 11(3), 305–316.Google Scholar
  33. Kshetri, N. (2014). Developing successful entrepreneurial ecosystems: Lessons from a comparison of an Asian tiger and a Baltic tiger. Baltic Journal of Management, 9(3), 330–356.Google Scholar
  34. Lewin, K. (1952). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  35. Lichtenstein, B. (2011). Complexity science contributions to the field of entrepreneurship. In A. Peter, S. Maguire, & B. McKelvey (Eds.), The Sage handbook of complexity and management (pp. 471–793). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Lichtenstein, B., & McKelvey, B. (2004). Complexity science and computational models of emergent order: What’s there? What’s missing? In Academy of management annual meeting. New Orleans: Academy of Management.Google Scholar
  37. Lichtenstein, B. B., Carter, N. M., Dooley, K. J., & Gartner, W. B. (2007). Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 236–261.Google Scholar
  38. Lindsay, V. J. (2005). The development of international industry clusters: A complexity theory approach. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 71–97.Google Scholar
  39. Manimala, M. J., Thomas, P., & Thomas, P. K. (2015). Perception of entrepreneurial ecosystem in India: Influence of industrial versus personal context of entrepreneurs. In R. La Rovere, L. de Magalhães Ozório, & L. de Jesus Melo (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in BRICS (pp. 105–123). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Mason, R. B. (2007). The external environment’s effect on management and strategy: A complexity theory approach. Management Decision, 45(1), 10–28.Google Scholar
  41. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. [ebook] (pp. 1–38). OECD. Accessed February 1, 2017, from http://www.regx.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/regx/filer/Filer_-_Nyheder/2014/OECD_Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf
  42. Mathews, K. M., White, M. C., & Long, R. G. (1999). Why study the complexity sciences in the social sciences? Human Relations, 52(4), 439–462.Google Scholar
  43. McKelvey, B. (2001). Energising order-creating networks of distributed intelligence: Improving the corporate brain. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(02), 181–212.Google Scholar
  44. McKelvey, B. (2004). Toward a complexity science of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 313–341.Google Scholar
  45. Merry, U. (1999). Organizational strategy on different landscapes: A new science approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), 257–278.Google Scholar
  46. Murmann, J. P. (2003). Knowledge and competitive advantage: The coevolution of firms, technology, and national institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208.Google Scholar
  48. Peltoniemi, M. (2006). Preliminary theoretical framework for the study of business ecosystems. Emergence-Mahwah-Lawrence Erlbaum, 8(1), 10.Google Scholar
  49. Peltoniemi, M., & Vuori, E. (2004). Business ecosystem as the new approach to complex adaptive business environments. In Frontiers of e-business research. Tampere, Finland, pp. 267–281.Google Scholar
  50. Pereverzeva, E. (2015). Key elements of the entrepreneurial ecosystem facilitating the growth of ICT entrepreneurs in Russia. In R. La Rovere, L. de Magalhães Ozório, & L. de Jesus Melo (Eds.), Entrepreneurship in BRICS (pp. 65–90). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Phelan, S. E. (1999). A note on the correspondence between complexity and systems theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 12(3), 237–246.Google Scholar
  52. Prahalad, C. K. (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Vikalpa, 30(2), 149–154.Google Scholar
  53. Schindehutte, M., & Morris, M. H. (2009). Advancing strategic entrepreneurship research: The role of complexity science in shifting the paradigm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 241–276.Google Scholar
  54. Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of complexity theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365.Google Scholar
  55. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  56. Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467–482.Google Scholar
  57. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.Google Scholar
  58. Suresh, J., & Ramraj, R. (2012). Entrepreneurial ecosystem: Case study on the influence of environmental factors on entrepreneurial success. European Journal of Business and Management, 4(16), 95–101.Google Scholar
  59. Swanson, L. A., & Zhang, D. D. (2011). Complexity theory and the social entrepreneurship zone. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 13(3), 39–56.Google Scholar
  60. Tan, J. (2007). Phase transitions and emergence of entrepreneurship: The transformation of Chinese SOEs over time. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 77–96.Google Scholar
  61. The Government of India, Planning Commission. (2012). Creating a vibrant entrepreneurial ecosystem in India. New Delhi, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
  62. Van de Van, H. (1993). The development of an infrastructure for entrepreneurship. Journal of Business venturing, 8(3), 211–230.Google Scholar
  63. Vogel, P., & Fischler-Strasak, U. (2014). Fostering sustainable innovation within organizations. In C. Weidinger, F. Fischler, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Sustainable entrepreneurship. CSR, sustainability, ethics and governance (pp. 191–205). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). Organismic psychology and systems theory. Worchester: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Walby, S. (2007). Complexity theory, systems theory, and multiple intersecting social inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(4), 449–470.Google Scholar
  66. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. London: Viking.Google Scholar
  67. Wu, J., & David, J. L. (2002). A spatially explicit hierarchical approach to modeling complex ecological systems: Theory and applications. Ecological Modelling, 153(1), 7–26.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EntrepreneurshipUniversity of TehranTehranIran
  2. 2.University of MilanMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations