Advertisement

Simulation-Based Approach to Evaluate the Effects of Food Supply Chain Mitigation and Compliance Strategies on Consumer Behavior and Risk Communication Methods

  • Jessye Talley
  • Lauren B. DavisEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Women in Engineering and Science book series (WES)

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that globally 1 in 10 people will become ill every year from eating a contaminated food product, resulting in 420,000 deaths. Food contamination can occur through several points within the food supply chain, a result of the intentional or accidental presence of biological/chemical contaminants. This has led public health officials to track food borne illness and create various mitigation strategies.

According to the Food Safety Modernization Act, companies are now required to develop Food Defense Plans that incorporate vulnerability assessments and mitigation strategies. However, the most common risk mitigation strategy to reduce illness is a recall. A recall can fall within three main classes to denote severity of risk associated with certain products. However, these classes are unclear to most consumers and delay their response to a contamination event. Therefore, companies need better risk communication practices in order to have full information for consumers to comply effectively with messages. Thirteen percent of Americans use information given by various media sources to look for recalled food products in their home. A survey conducted by Rutgers Food Institute Policy highlighted the common information that consumers feel they need during a recall which were identifying information (1) about the food product, (2) the food product source, and (3) where the food product is sold.

This chapter presents an overview of food supply chain vulnerabilities and the relationship between risk mitigation strategies and consumer behavior with a focus on messaging. We also discuss several approaches to modeling food supply chain contamination events and the associated impacts on consumers that incorporate consumer behavior, messaging, and recalls. We specifically consider consumer purchasing, consumption, and compliance behavior as a function of various risk mitigation strategies implemented in the food supply chain. The goal is to understand the extent of the contamination event, frequency and timing of the messaging, and recall notifications that reduce foodborne illness.

References

  1. Akkerman R, Poorya F, Grunow M (2010) Quality, safety and sustainability in food distribution: a review of quantitative operations management approaches and challenges. OR Spectr 32(2):863–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Bar Association (2014) The role of the government in regulating food: an overview. https://www.americanbar.org/publications/aba_health_esource/2013-14/february/the_role_of_the_government.html. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  3. Basak U, Datta B, Ghose P (2015) Mathematical analysis of an HIV/AIDS epidemic model. Am J Math Stat 5(5):253–258Google Scholar
  4. Batz M, Hoffmann S, Morris J (2011) Ranking the risks: the 10 pathogen-food combinations with the greatest burden on public health. https://epi.ufl.edu/blog/keeping-americas-food-supply-safe/
  5. Blaynesh K, Cao Y, Kwon H (2009) Optimal control of vector-borne diseases: treatment and prevention. Discrete Continuous Dyn Syst Ser B 11(3):1–31MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchanan R, Appel B (2010) Combining analysis tools and mathematical modeling to enhance and harmonize food safety and food defense regulatory requirements. Int J Food Microbiol 139:S48–S56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caraballo-Martinez K, Burt S (2011) Determining how and why consumer purchasing of grocery and household products varies. Afr J Bus Manag 5(16):6917–6926Google Scholar
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013a) Multistate outbreak of human salmonella Heidelberg infections linked to ground Turkey. http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/heidelberg/111011/
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013b) CDC estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013c) Timeline for reporting cases of salmonella infection. http://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/reporting-timeline.html
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014) Tracking and reporting foodborne disease outbreaks. http://www.cdc.gov/features/dsfoodborneoutbreaks/
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and US Department of Health and Human Services (2015) Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks United States, 2013, annual reportGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang Y, Zhang Y, Erera AL, White C (2012) Vulnerability assessment of a food supply chain to an intentional attack. In: IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, pp 319–324Google Scholar
  14. Chang Y, Erera A, White C (2015a) A leader-follower partially observed, multiobjective Markov game. Ann Oper Res 235(1)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang Y, Erera A, White C (2015b) Value of information for a leader-follower partially observed Markov game. Ann Oper Res 235(1):129–153MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chao DL, Longini IM Jr, Halloran ME (2013) The effects of vector movement and distribution in a mathematical model of dengue transmission. PLoS One 8(10):e76044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chaturvedi A, Armstrong B, Chaturvedi R (2014) Securing the food supply chain: understanding complex interdependence through agent-based simulation. Health Technol 4:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chebolu-Subramanian V, Gaukler G (2015) Product contamination in a multi-stage food supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 244:164–175zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen C, Zhang J, Delaurentis T (2013) Quality control in food supply chain management: An analytical model and case study of the adulterated milk incident in china. Int J Prod Econ 152:188–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chitnis N, Hyman J, Manore C (2012) Modelling vertical transmission in vector-borne diseases with applications to rift valley fever. J Biol Dyn 7(1):11–40MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crooks A, Hailegiorgis A (2014) An agent-based modeling approach applied to the spread of cholera. Environ Model Simul 62:164–177Google Scholar
  22. Dasakalis T, Pappis C, Rachaniotis N (2012) Epidemics control and logistic operations: A review. J Prod Econ 139:393–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Department of Homeland Security Risk Steering Committee (2010) Dhs risk lexicon. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Dewey C (2017) Why the FDA hides the names of grocery stores that sell contaminated food. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/13/fda-says-soynut-butter-could-make-your-child-sick-who-sold-it-thats-a-trade-secret/?utm_term=.03209f1e0acf. Accessed 6 Jan 2018
  25. Dietz K (1967) Epidemics and rumors: a survey. J R Stat Soc Series A 130(4):505–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erongul B (2013) Consumer awareness and perception to food safety: a consumer analysis. Food Control 32:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. FDA (2007) Food protection planGoogle Scholar
  28. FDA (2017) Where did the FDA come from, and what does it do? https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/origins-FDA-what-does-it-do-180962054/. Accessed 7 Feb 2018
  29. Fendyur A (2011) Applications of operations research/statistics in infection outbreak management. Int Business Econ Res J 10(2)Google Scholar
  30. Flynn D (2013) Turkish pomegranate seeds spread rare virus across U.S. http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2013/07/turkish-pomengranate-seeds-spread-rare-virus-across-u-s/#.VOQVFS7q9yV
  31. Foundation GC (2015) Food processing & slaughterhouses. http://www.sustainabletable.org/279/food-processing-slaughterhouses
  32. Freberg K (2012) Intention to comply with crisis messages communicated via social media. Public Relat Rev 38:416–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gao SJ, Teng ZD, Xie DH (2008) The effects of pulse vaccination on SEIR model with two time delays. Appl Math Comput 201(1–2):282–292MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Gourley S, Liu R, Wu J (2007) Some vector borne diseases with structured host populations: extinction and spatial spread. J Appl Math 67(2):408–432MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Government Accountability Office (2012) FDA’s food advisory and recall process needs strengtheningGoogle Scholar
  36. Grimm V, Berger U, Bastiansen F, Eliassen S, Ginot V, Giske J, Goss-Custard J, Grand T, Heinz SK, Huse G, Huth A, Jepsen JU, Jorgensen C, Mooij WM, Müller B, Pe’er G, Piou C, Railsback SF, Robbins AM, Robbins MM, Rossmanith E, Rüger N, Strand E, Souissi S, Stillman RA, Vabe R, Visser U, DeAngelis DL (2006) A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol Model 198:115–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grunert K (2002) Current issues in understanding of consumer food choice. Trends Food Sci Technol 13:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hallman W, Cutie C (2009) Food recalls and the American public: improving communications. Technical report. Rutgers UniversityGoogle Scholar
  39. Hartnett E, Paoli GM, Schaffner DW (2009) Modeling the public health system response to a terrorist event in the food supply. Risk Anal 29(11):1506–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Huang S (2008) A new SEIR epidemic model with application to the theory of eradication and control of diseases, and to the eradication of R0. Math Biosci 215:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jaine A (2005) A predictive modeling and decision-making tool to facilitate government and industry response to an intentional contamination of the food supply. In: The Institute of Food Technologists’ First Annual Food Protection and Defense ConferenceGoogle Scholar
  42. Kirkizlar E, Faissol DM, Griffin PM, Swann JL (2010) Timing of testing and treatment for asymptomatic diseases. Math Biosci 226(1):28–37MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knowles-McPhee S (2015) Growing food safety from the bottom up: an agent based model for food safety inspections. J Artif Soc Social Simul 18(2):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kramer GJ, Fasone V (2016) Consumer food trends create food safety challenges for the food service industry. https://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/magazine-archive1/junejuly-2017/consumer-food-trends-create-food-safety-challenges-for-the-foodservice-industry/. Accessed 21 Jan 2018
  45. Kuo HS, Chang HJ, Chou P, Teng L, Chen THH (1999) A Markov chain model to assess the efficacy of screening for non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Int J Epidemiol 28(2):233–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee JM, Choi D, Cho G, Kim Y (2012) The effect of public health interventions on the spread of influenza among cities. J Theor Biol 293:131–142MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu Y, Wein LM (2005) Analyzing a bioterror attack on the food supply: the case of botulinum toxin in milk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(8):9984–9989Google Scholar
  48. Liu Y, Wein LM (2008) Mathematically assessing the consequences of food terrorism scenarios. J Food Sci 73(7):M346–M353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Manizini R, Accorsi R (2013) The new conceptual framework for food supply chain assessment. J Food Eng 115:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marucheck A, Greis N, Mena C, Cai LN (2011) Product safety and security in the global supply chain: Issues, challenges and research opportunities. J Oper Manag 29(7-8):707–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mohtadi H, Murshid AP (2009) Risk analysis of chemical, biological, or radionuclear threats: implications for food security. Risk Anal 29(9):1317–1335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. National Center for Food Protection and Defense (2014) Overview. https://www.ncfpd.umn.edu/about/overview/
  53. Ozair M, Lashari A, Jung I, Seo Y, Kim B (2013) Stability analysis of a vector-borne disease with variable human population. Abstr Appl Anal 2013:1–12MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pacheo-Cruz G, Esteva L, Vargas C (2014) Vaccination strategies for SIR vector-transmitted diseases. Bull Math Biol 76:2073–2090MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pappas S (2013) Cancer doctor’s alleged poisoning: how can ethylene glycol kill?Google Scholar
  56. Parham PE, Michael E (2011) Outbreak properties of epidemic models: the roles of temporal forcing and stochasticity on pathogen invasion dynamics. J Theor Biol 271(1):1–9MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paul J (2012) Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food. J Consum Mark 29(6):412–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rong A, Grunow M (2010) A methodology for controlling dispersion in food production and distribution. OR Spectr 32:957–978MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saulo A, Moskowitz H (2011) Uncovering the mind-sets of consumers towards food safety messages. Food Qual Prefer 22:422–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shah NH, Gupta J (2013) SEIR model and simulation for vector borne diseases. Appl Math 4:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sifferlin A (2015) 351,000 people die of food poisoning globally every year. http://time.com/3768003/351000-people-die-of-food-poisoning-globally-every-year/
  62. Souza MO (2014) Multiscale analysis for a vector-borne epidemic model. J Math Biol 68(5):1269–1293MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steelfisher G, Weldon K, Benson J, Blendon R (2010) Public perceptions of food recalls and production safety: two survey’s of the American public. J Food Saf 30:848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sydsaeter K, Hammond PJ (1995) Mathematics for economic analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  65. Talley JB (2016) Modeling individual consumer food contamination progression with interventions. Dissertation. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, GreensboroGoogle Scholar
  66. Tasty S (2015) Your ultimate shelf life guide. stilltasty.com
  67. Teasley R, Bemley J, Davis LB, Erera A, Chang Y (2016) A Markov chain model for quantifying consumer risk in food supply chains. Health Syst 5(2):149–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Trottier H, Philippe P (2002) Deterministic modeling of infectious diseases: measles cycles and the role of births and vaccination. Internet J Infect Dis 2(2):1–8Google Scholar
  69. Uhry Z, Hedelin G, Colonna M, Asselain B, Arveux P, Exbrayat C, Guldenfelds C, Soler-Michel P, Molinie F, Tretarre B, Rogel A, Courtial I, Danzon A, Guizard AV, Ancelle-Park R, Eilstein D, Duffy S (2011) Modelling the effect of breast cancer screening on related mortality using French data. Cancer Epidemiol 35(3):235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. USDA (2014) Food safety and inspection service protecting public health and preventing foodborne illness. https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/7a35776b-4717-43b5-b0ce-aeec64489fbd/mission-book.pdf?MOD=AJPERES. Accessed 3 Feb 2018
  71. Viljoen S, Pienaar E, Viljoen H (2011) A state-time epidemiology model of tuberculosis: importance of re-infection. Comput Biol Chem 36:8MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. Vlajic JV, van der Vorst JG, van der Vorst AJ, Haijema R (2012) A framework for designing robust food supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 137(1):176–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ward J, Ward L (2015) Principles of food science, 4th edn. Goodheart-Willcox, Tinley ParkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. Watkins ME (2015) Modeling consumer behavior for high risk foods. Master’s thesis. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, GreensboroGoogle Scholar
  75. Wei H, Zhi X, Martchova M (2008) An epidemic model of a vector-borne disease with direct transmission and time delay. J Math Anal Appl 342(2):895–908MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wei D, Zongchen F, Peng Z, Gang G, Xiaogang Q (2015) Mathematical and computational approaches to epidemic modeling: a comprehensive review. Front Comp Sci 9(5):806–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yan P, Feng Z (2010) Variability order of the latent and the infectious periods in a deterministic SEIR epidemic model and evaluation of control effectiveness. Math Biosci 224(1):43–52MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zechmann E (2011) Agent-based modeling to simulate contamination events and evaluate threat management strategies in water distribution systems. Risk Anal 31(5):758–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Morgan State UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.North Carolina A&T UniversityGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations