Advertisement

Contributions to Humanitarian and Non-profit Operations: Equity Impacts on Modeling and Solution Approaches

  • Burcu Balcik
  • Karen SmilowitzEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Women in Engineering and Science book series (WES)

Abstract

Equity has been acknowledged as an important concern in designing and managing humanitarian and non-profit operations over the past decade. Given the significant demands for relief supplies created by a disaster and the scarcity of resources (such as supplies, vehicles, equipment), it is inevitable that some needs will be satisfied later than others, and effective prioritization is crucial. Relief organizations are faced with the challenge of finding ways to deliver resources in an equitable way to increase the chances of survival of people. These issues also emerge in the operations of non-profit organizations that allocate distribute scarce resources. Important contributions have been made by women in studying equity in humanitarian and non-profit operations, both in terms of practical insights and methodological advances. In this chapter, we review key papers written by women, which have advanced the literature in characterizing equity in humanitarian and non-profit operations and exploring the methodological implications of equity.

References

  1. Aksu DT, Ozdamar L (2014) A mathematical model for post-disaster road restoration: enabling accessibility and evacuation. Transp Res E Log Transp Rev 61:56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayer T, Keskinocak P, Swann J (2014) Research in public health for efficient, effective, and equitable outcomes. In: Bridging data and decisions. Informs, Catonsville, pp 216–239. Chapter 9Google Scholar
  3. Balcik B, Beamon BM, Smilowitz K (2008) Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. J Intell Transp Syst 12(2):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balcik B, Iravani SM, Smilowitz K (2010) A review of equity in nonprofit and public sector: a vehicle routing perspective. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  5. Balcik B, Iravani S, Smilowitz K (2014) Multi-vehicle sequential resource allocation for a nonprofit distribution system. IIE Trans 46(12):1279–1297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battarra M, Balcik B, Xu H (2018) Disaster preparedness using risk-assessment methods from earthquake engineering. Eur J Oper Res 269:423–435zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beamon BM (1999) Measuring supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19(3):275–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beamon BM (2004) Humanitarian relief chains: issues and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 34th international conference on computers and industrial engineering San Francisco, CA, November 14–16, vol 34, pp 77–82Google Scholar
  9. Beamon BM, Balcik B (2008) Performance measurement in humanitarian relief chains. Int J Public Sect Manag 21(1):4–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berenguer G (2016) Modeling approaches and metrics to evaluate nonprofit operations. In: Advances in managing humanitarian operations. Springer, Cham, pp 9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell AM, Vandenbussche D, Hermann W (2008) Routing for relief efforts. Transp Sci 42(2):127–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cao W, Çelik M, Ergun Ö, Swann J, Viljoen N (2016) Challenges in service network expansion: an application in donated breastmilk banking in South Africa. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 53:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chanta S, Mayorga ME, Kurz ME, McLay LA (2011) The minimum p-envy location problem: a new model for equitable distribution of emergency resources. IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng 1(2):101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis LB, Samanlioglu F, Qu X, Root S (2013) Inventory planning and coordination in disaster relief efforts. Int J Prod Econ 141(2):561–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis LB, Sengul I, Ivy JS, Brock LG, Miles L (2014) Scheduling food bank collections and deliveries to ensure food safety and improve access. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 48(3):175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deo S, Iravani S, Jiang T, Smilowitz K, Samuelson S (2013) Improving health outcomes through better capacity allocation in a community-based chronic care model. Oper Res 61(6):1277–1294MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eisenhander O, Tzur M (2018) The humanitarian pickup and distribution problem. Oper Res 67(1):10–32MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elçi Ö, Noyan N (2018) A chance-constrained two-stage stochastic programming model for humanitarian relief network design. Transp Res B Methodol 108:55–83zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ergun Ö, Gui L, Heier Stamm JL, Keskinocak P, Swann J (2014) Improving humanitarian operations through technology-enabled collaboration. Prod Oper Manag 23(6):1002–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fianu S, Davis LB (2018) A Markov decision process model for equitable distribution of supplies under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 264(3):1101–1115MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gralla E, Goentzel J, Fine C (2014) Assessing trade-offs among multiple objectives for humanitarian aid delivery using expert preferences. Prod Oper Manag 23(6):978–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grass E, Fischer K (2016) Two-stage stochastic programming in disaster management: a literature survey. Surv Oper Res Manag Sci 21(2):85–100MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong X, Lejeune MA, Noyan N (2015) Stochastic network design for disaster preparedness. IIE Trans 47(4):329–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang M, Smilowitz K, Balcik B (2012) Models for relief routing: equity, efficiency and efficacy. Transp Res E Logist Transp Rev 48(1):2–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson MP, Gorr WL, Roehrig S (2005) Location of service facilities for the elderly. Ann Oper Res 136(1):329–349MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leclerc PD, McLay LA, Mayorga ME (2012) Modeling equity for allocating public resources. In: Community-based operations research. Springer, New York, pp 97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lien RW, Iravani SM, Smilowitz KR (2014) Sequential resource allocation for nonprofit operations. Oper Res 62(2):301–317MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marsh MT, Schilling DA (1994) Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and framework. Eur J Oper Res 74(1):1–17zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLay LA, Mayorga ME (2013) A dispatching model for server-to-customer systems that balances efficiency and equity. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 15(2):205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Muggy L, Stamm JLH (2017) Dynamic, robust models to quantify the impact of decentralization in post-disaster health care facility location decisions. Oper Res Health Care 12:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noham R, Tzur M (2018) Designing humanitarian supply chains by incorporating actual post-disaster decisions. Eur J Oper Res 265(3):1064–1077MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Noyan N, Kahvecioğlu G (2017) Stochastic last mile relief network design with resource reallocation. OR Spectr. 40(1):187–231MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noyan N, Balcik B, Atakan S (2015) A stochastic optimization model for designing last mile relief networks. Transp Sci 50(3):1092–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Noyan N, Merakli M, Kucukyavuz S (2017) Two-stage stochastic programming under multivariate risk constraints with an application to humanitarian relief network design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06096Google Scholar
  35. Orgut IS, Ivy J, Uzsoy R, Wilson JR (2016) Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food under capacity constraints. IIE Trans 48(3):252–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savelsbergh M, Smilowitz K (2016) Stratified patient appointment scheduling for mobile community-based chronic disease management programs. IIE Trans Healthc Syst Eng 6(2):65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sengul Orgut I, Ivy J, Uzsoy R (2017) Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of food donations under stochastic receiving capacities. IISE Trans 49(6):567–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toro-Díaz H, Mayorga ME, McLay LA, Rajagopalan HK, Saydam C (2015) Reducing disparities in large-scale emergency medical service systems. J Oper Res Soc 66(7):1169–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vitoriano B, Ortuño MT, Tirado G, Montero J (2011) A multi-criteria optimization model for humanitarian aid distribution. J Glob Optim 51(2):189–208MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. VonAchen P, Smilowitz K, Raghavan M, Feehan R (2016) Optimizing community healthcare coverage in remote Liberia. J Humanit Logist Supply Chain Manag 6(3):352–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Industrial EngineeringOzyegin UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Industrial Engineering and Management SciencesNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations