Advertisement

Lesion Management: No Removal of Carious Tissue

  • Meenakshi S. Kher
  • Ashwin Rao
Chapter

Abstract

Managing a carious lesion without removing any carious tissue is a radical conceptual shift in the treatment of dental caries. Strategies to manage carious lesions without removing carious tissue have the advantage of reducing and often eliminating discomfort, pain, and dental anxiety that are an inadvertent part of the more invasive operative procedures. This approach is especially invaluable in treating children whose ability is compromised by age, behavior, or disabilities. The rationale behind managing carious lesions without removing carious tissue is based on current understanding that the pathogenicity of the carious lesion is dependent on how we manage the overlying plaque biofilm. Treatment modalities that disturb the biofilm or deprive the cariogenic bacteria in the biofilm of micronutrients slow down and arrest the carious lesion. These include sealing in the carious lesion with “fissure sealing” and the “Hall technique,” arresting early proximal lesions with “resin infiltration,” and “non-restorative cavity control” with a “fluoride varnish” or the use of “silver diamine fluoride.” This chapter comprises an exhaustive discussion of each of these five procedures described step-by-step with the aid of high-quality clinical photographs, long-term follow-ups, and clinical tips.

Keywords

Hall crown Sealing in caries Resin infiltration Silver diamine fluoride Fluoride varnish Fissure sealing Ultraconservative removal Selective removal Carious lesions Partial removal NRCC Non-restorative Non-operative Minimally invasive 

References

  1. 1.
    Schwendicke F. Contemporary concepts in carious tissue removal: a review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(6):403–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12338.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, Van Landuyt K, Banerjee A, Campus G, Doméjean S, Fontana M, Leal S, Lo E, Machiulskiene V, Schulte A, Splieth C, Zandona AF, Innes NP. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dorri M, Dunne SM, Walsh T, Schwendicke F. Micro-invasive interventions for managing proximal dental decay in primary and permanent teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11):CD010431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010431.
  4. 4.
    Christiansen J. Non-operative caries treatment. In: Splieth CH, editor. Revolutions in pediatric dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2011. p. 21–35.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hansen NV, Nyvad B. Non-operative control of cavitated approximal caries lesions in primary molars: a prospective evaluation of cases. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(7):537–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Guidelines on the use of fluoride in children: an EAPD policy document. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10(3):129–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Toumba J. Current guidelines for the use of fluorides for caries prevention. In: Splieth CH, editor. Revolutions in pediatric dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2011. p. 37–48.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    dos Santos AP, Nadanovsky P, de Oliveira BH. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of fluoride toothpastes on the prevention of dentalcaries in the primary dentition of preschool children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41(1):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00708.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Duangthip D, Wong MCM, Chu CH, Lo ECM. Caries arrest by topical fluorides in preschool children: 30-month results. J Dent. 2018;70:74–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Slayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB, Fontana M, Guzmán-Armstrong S, Nascimento MM, Nový BB, Tinanoff N, Weyant RJ, Wolff MS, Young DA, Zero DT, Tampi MP, Pilcher L, Banfield L, Carrasco-Labra A. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: a report from the American Dental Association. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(10):837–849.e19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bruun C, Givskov H. Formation of CaF2 on sound enamel and in caries-like enamel lesions after different forms of fluoride applications in vitro. Caries Res. 1991;25(2):96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chu CH, Lo EC. Promoting caries arrest in children with silver diamine fluoride: a review. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6(4):315–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crystal YO, Niederman R. Silver diamine fluoride treatment considerations in children’s caries management. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(7):466–71.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knight GM, McIntyre JM, Craig GG, Mulyani, Zilm PS, Gully NJ. Inability to form a biofilm of Streptococcus mutans on silver fluoride- and potassium iodide-treated demineralized dentin. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(2):155–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenblatt A, Stamford TC, Niederman R. Silver diamine fluoride: a caries “silver-fluoride bullet”. J Dent Res. 2009;88(2):116–25.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034508329406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Use of silver diamine fluoride for dental caries management in children and adolescents, including those with special health care needs. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(6):146–55.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horst JA, Ellenikiotis H, Milgrom PL. UCSF protocol for caries arrest using silver diamine fluoride: rationale, indications and consent. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2016;44(1):16–28.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chairside guide: silver diamine fluoride in the management of dental caries lesions. Pediatr Dent. 2017;39(6):478–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bendit J, Young D. Silver diamine fluoride: the newest tool in your caries management kit. In: Dental academy of continuing education. July 2017; 2017. https://www.dentalacademyofce.com/courses/3347/PDF/1707cei_Bendit_Young_web.pdf. Accessed 6 Sep 2018.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ratledge DK, Kidd EA, Beighton D. A clinical and microbiological study of approximal carious lesions. Part 1: the relationship between cavitation, radiographic lesion depth, the site-specific gingival index and the level of infection of the dentine. Caries Res. 2001;35(1):3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anusavice KJ. Present and future approaches for the control of caries. J Dent Educ. 2005;69(5):538–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H. Microinvasive caries treatment by resin infiltration. In: Splieth CH, editor. Revolutions in pediatric dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2011. p. 103–17.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paris S, Hopfenmuller W, Meyer-Lueckel H. Resin infiltration of caries lesions: an efficacy randomized trial. J Dent Res. 2010;89(8):823–6.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510369289.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robinson C, Brookes SJ, Kirkham J, Wood SR, Shore RC. In vitro studies of the penetration of adhesive resins into artificial caries-like lesions. Caries Res. 2001;35(2):136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huysmans MC. New diagnostic approaches: promise or reality? In: Splieth CH, editor. Revolutions in pediatric dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2011. p. 1–10.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2007;86(7):662–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bagher SM, Hegazi FM, Finkelman M, Ramesh A, Gowharji N, Swee G, Felemban O, Loo CY. Radiographic effectiveness of resin infiltration in arresting incipient proximal enamel lesions in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40(3):195–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Cölfen H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of artificial enamel caries lesions with experimental light curing resins. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(4):582–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hesse D, Bonifácio CC, Mendes FM, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14:58.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent. 2016;38(6):263–79.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Borges BC, de Souza Borges J, Braz R, Montes MA, de Assunção Pinheiro IV. Arrest of non-cavitated dentinal occlusal caries by sealing pits and fissures: a 36-month, randomised controlled clinical trial. Int Dent J. 2012;62(5):251–5.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2012.00117.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ricketts DNJ, Innes NPT. To drill or not to drill? How much caries removal do we need? In: Splieth CH, editor. Revolutions in pediatric dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2011. p. 119–34.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hewlett ER, Mount GJ. Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry--a clinical update. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003;31(6):483–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berg JH. Glass ionomer cements. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(5):430–8. Review.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ovrebö RC, Raadal M. Microleakage in fissures sealed with resin or glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res. 1990;98(1):66–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Evans D, Innes N. The hall technique. A minimal intervention, child centred approach to managing the carious primary molar: a users manual. November 11, 2010. 3rd ed. Dundee: University of Dundee; 2010. https://dentistry.dundee.ac.uk/files/3M_93C%20HallTechGuide2191110.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2018.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Innes NPT, Evans DJP. The Hall technique as a new method for managing caries in primary molars: is it really a revolution? In: Splieth CH, editor. Revolutions in pediatric dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence; 2011. p. 151–62.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Schwendicke F, Innes N. Removal strategies for carious tissues in deep lesions. In: Schwendicke F, editor. Management of deep carious lesions. New York, NY: Springer; 2018. p. 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    BaniHani A, Toumba K, Duggal M, Deery CH. Outcomes of the conventional and biological treatment approaches for the management of caries in the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018;28:12.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    BaniHani A, Deery C, Toumba K, Duggal M. Effectiveness, costs and patient acceptance of a conventional and a biological treatment approach for carious primary teeth in children. Caries Res. 2019;53:65–75.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000487201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Paddick JS, Brailsford SR, Kidd EA, Beighton D. Phenotypic and genotypic selection of microbiota surviving under dental restorations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(5):2467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meenakshi S. Kher
    • 1
  • Ashwin Rao
    • 2
  1. 1.Happy Tooth Clinic for KidsMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.MCODS Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher EducationManipalIndia

Personalised recommendations