Advertisement

A Multicriteria Analysis of Agricultural Production Options for Sustaining Uluguru Mountains Natural Resource Base

  • Joseph Hella
  • Acquiline Wamba
Chapter
Part of the Natural Resource Management and Policy book series (NRMP, volume 53)

Abstract

This paper presents results of a study conducted in parts of Eastern Arc, Uluguru Mountains in Tanzania. The main objective was to identify and select best agricultural production options for sustaining the natural resource base of the Mountains. A cross sectional single-visit interview of 120 farmers from Konde, Tawa and Kiswila villages representing high, medium and low altitudes, respectively was conducted. Differences in accessibility to the market were also considered when drawing a sample. Multi-Criteria analysis (MCA) as decision support tool (DST) was developed to identify best cropping options suitable for specific location for sustainable management of the mountain. Results show high differences in production options within and across the villages caused by differences in plot positions (sloppy grounds or valley bottoms) and households’ socio-economic characteristics. Banana, clove and cassava are common crops for Konde village located at high altitude; banana, pineapple and maize for Kiswila village located at low altitude and banana, pineapple and cassava for Tawa village located at medium altitude. MCA results were collated with profitability index to identify the crops and livestock production options in fragile mountain resource base. The study recommends promotion of cassava and banana production as ideal crops both for food security, income and effectiveness in natural resource conservation. Crops such as rice, pineapple and cloves should be avoided in mountain ecosystem for sustainability reason.

Keywords

Cropping options Uluguru mountains Multicriteria Environment Sustainability 

References

  1. Conrad, JM (1999) Resource economics. Cambridge University press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Graaff, J (1996) The price of soil erosion. An economic evaluation of soil conservation and watershed development. PhD Thesis. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Graaff, J, Valk W, Fleskens, L (2001) Impact Assessment of Land and Water Management. Lecture Notes. Erosion and water Conservation Group. Wageningen University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. HellaJP (2003) Economic analysis of the relationship between smallholder farming strategies and soil degradation in semi-arid Tanzania. Gent University, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. Kisanga, DR, Shayo-Ngowi, AJ, Rwehumbiza, FBR, Msanya, BM (1992). Effect of two terracing methods on soil fertility and performance at Uluguru Mountains. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual General Meeting of the Soil Science Society of East Africa (Edited by Aroe, WW, Okalebo, JR, Ikombo, BM, et al) 30th Nov-4th Dec., Morogoro, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Marc, O R, Colacicco, D, Barbarika, A, Young, CE (1989). The Economic Efficiency of Voluntary Soil Conservation Programs. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.44 (3):40–43.Google Scholar
  7. Mawenya, LAJ (1994) Soil conservation and Agroforestry in Tanzania. A survey in nine regions and proposal for training of staff. Tanzania.Google Scholar
  8. Ministry of Tourism, Natural Resources and Environment (MTNRE) (1994) Tanzania Forestry Action Plan 1989/90-2007/08 Update, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.Google Scholar
  9. Mkoba, AP (2001) Effectiveness of Fanya Chini terraces on soil properties and crop yield in the North- western part of Uluguru Mountains, Unpublished Dissertation for Award of MSc Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.Google Scholar
  10. Mwanyoka, I, Lopa, D, Massoro, E et a.l (2010) Equitable Payment for Watershed Services: Managing Watersheds by Accomplishing What Previously Impossible in the Ulugurus. WWF and CARE.Google Scholar
  11. Nijkamp, P, Voogd JH (1990) Multi criteria evaluation in physical planning. North- Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. Pamela, AM (1996)We don’t want terraces: Protest and identity under The Uluguru Land Usage scheme in Gregory, M et al,(1996) (eds) Custodians of the land Eastern African Studies London.Google Scholar
  13. Sanders, DW (1990) New Strategies for soil conservation. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation45 (5): 511–516.Google Scholar
  14. Sanga, GJ, Mungatana, ED (2016) Integrating Ecological and Economics in understanding responses in securing land-use externalities under internalization in water catchments. Ecological Economics121: 28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shelunkindo, H, Gaudens, K (1993) Development, experience and reorientation of soil erosion control and agroforestry activities in the West Usambara mountains, Tanzania. In: Workshop on National Agro forestry and Environment. 12–13 October, 1993, Morogoro, Tanzania.Google Scholar
  16. Semgalawa, ZM, Henk, F (2000)Household adoption behavior of improved soil conservation: the case of the North Pare and West Usambara Mountains of Tanzania, National Coordination Unit for Farming Systems Research, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.Google Scholar
  17. Shenkalwa, EM (1989) Evaluation of erosion control in Tanzania by soil physio-chemical analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Gent, Belgium.Google Scholar
  18. Sibaway, BM (2000) Automated Land Evaluation for alternative use in South Western part of the Uluguru Mountains in Morogoro Rural District, Unpublished Dissertation for Award of MSc Degree at Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro,Tanzania.Google Scholar
  19. Tenge, AJ, de Graaff, J, Hella, JP (2004) Social and economic factors affecting the adoption of soil and water conservation in west Usambara highlands, Tanzania. Land Degradation Development15: 99–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ticheler, J, Defoer, T, and Kater, L (2000) Resources Kit for Participatory Learning and Action Research - Detailed Field Tools for PLAR User’s Guide for the Resource KIT, CD-ROM. Managing Soil Fertility in the Tropics, KIT. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Uluguru Mountain Agricultural Development Project (UMADEP) (2001). UMADEP agricultural report for the year 2001.[http://easternarc.or.tz/downloads/Uluguru/WCST- UMBCPreports/UMADEP%20Agricultural%20report%202001.pdf] siteGoogle Scholar
  22. Uluguru Mountains Agricultural Development Project (UMADEP) (2006).Programme to support livelihood security in the lowlands of Uluguru Mountains. Progress report for the period January –December 2005.Google Scholar
  23. United Republic of Tanzania (URT) (2005). Hydrological Analysis of Eastern Arc Mountains Forests. Forest and Beekeeping Division, Dar-es-Salaam, TanzaniaGoogle Scholar
  24. URT (2003). Ageing and Poverty in Tanzania: Tanzania Country Report. Vice President’s Office, United Republic of Tanzania.Google Scholar
  25. Veldhizen, V, Waters-Bayer, H, and Zeeuw, H (1997) Developing Technology with Farmers a Farmer’s Guide for Participatory Learning. ETC/ZED Books, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  26. Voogd, JH (1985) Multi criteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Delftsche Uitgevers Maatschappij B.V. Delft, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. World Bank (2007) Conservation in Tanzania, Conservation in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania, East Africa. [http://www.africanconservation.org/uluguru/contents.html] site visited on 29/7/2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Hella
    • 1
  • Acquiline Wamba
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Agricultural Economics and Business StudiesSokoine University of AgricultureSokoineTanzania

Personalised recommendations