Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Rob CreasyEmail author
  • Fiona Corby
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter revisits the basic argument of the book that childhood is being subject to socio-political forces which are shaping it in ways which restrict and impoverish children’s lived experiences. This contributes to a childhood that does not prepare children for their future, nor provide scope for their development. A tame childhood contributes to the mental and emotional problems which children increasingly report. In concluding, we point to the fallacy that things are done in the best interests of children and provide pointers to the manner in which a tame childhood can be resisted in ways which give scope to children to try and, sometimes, fail. Children need some freedom, but that does not mean that they have no boundaries.

Keywords

Childhood Development Emotional problems Best interests Freedom Boundaries 

References

  1. Andrews, J., Hutchinson, J., & Johnes, R. 2016. Grammar Schools and Social Mobility. London: Education Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Coe, R., Jones, K., Searle, J., Kokotsaki, D., Mohd Kosnin, A., & Skinner, P. 2008. Evidence on the Effects of Selective Educational Systems. Durham: CEM Centre and Durham University.Google Scholar
  4. Layard, R., & Dunn, J. 2009. A Good Childhood: Searching for Values in a Competitive Age. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  5. Perry, N. B., Dollar, J. M., Calkins, S. D., Keane, S. P., & Shanahan, L. 2018. Childhood Self-Regulation as a Mechanism Through Which Early Overcontrolling Parenting Is Associated with Adjustment in Preadolescence. Developmental Psychology, 54, 1542–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Storr, W. 2017. Selfie: How We Became So Self-Obsessed and What It’s Doing to Us. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  8. Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. 2011. Preschool in Three Cultures Revisited: China, Japan, and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Van Rosmalen, L., Van der Horst, F. C. P., & Van der Veer, R. 2016. From Secure Dependency to Attachment: Mary Ainsworth’s Integration of Blatz’s Security Theory into Bowlby’s Attachment Theory. History of Psychology, 19, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Rosmalen, L., Van der Veer, R., & Van der Horst, F. 2015. Ainsworth’s Strange Situation Procedure: The Origin of an Instrument. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 51, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wheway, R. 2008. Not a Risk Averse Society: Fair Play for Children. 2nd ed. Bognor Regis: Fair Play for Children.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychological and Social SciencesYork St John UniversityYorkUK
  2. 2.School of Social Sciences, Humanities and LawTeesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations