Advertisement

Introduction

  • Rob CreasyEmail author
  • Fiona Corby
Chapter

Abstract

In recent decades, UK society has seen a number of changes which increase pressure on children. This has contributed to the reported deterioration in the mental health of children alongside an increasing level of unhappiness. It appears as though children and young people lack resilience. Taming Childhood presents an argument regarding how social changes are contributing to children experiencing life in ways that are increasingly restricted and impoverished, what we refer to as tame. We argue that this is not a positive development, it is a childhood which restricts what children can do, undermining the development of resilience and undermining well-being.

Keywords

Mental health Unhappiness Resilience Childhood 

References

  1. Action for Children. 2018. Mental Health for Young People (Online). Watford. Available https://www.actionforchildren.org.uk/what-we-do/our-impact/mental-health-overview/mental-health-for-young-people/. Accessed 18 October 2018.
  2. Aynsley-Green, A. 2018. The British Betrayal of Childhood. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A. 2006. Is the Study of the “State of Our Children” Changing? Re-visiting After 5 Years. Children and Youth Services Review, 28, 799–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J. (ed.). 2016. The Well-Being of Children in the UK. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. 2007. An Index of Child Well-Being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80, 133–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Care Quality Commission. 2017. The State of Health Care and Adult Social Care in England 2016/2017. London.Google Scholar
  7. The Children’s Society. 2018. The Good Childhood Report 2018. London.Google Scholar
  8. DfES. 2004. Every Child Matters: Change for Children/ Department for Education and Skills. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  9. Foundation, M. H. 2016. Fundamental Facts About Mental Health 2016. London: Mental Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Hartog, J., & Oosterbeek, H. 2007. What Should You Know About the Private Returns to Education? In: Hartog, J., & Maassen Van Den Brink, H. (eds.), Human Capital: Advances in Theory and Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. James, A. 2009. Childhood Matters: Is Children’s Wellbeing a High Enough Priority. Mental Health Today, 18.Google Scholar
  12. OECD. 2009. Doing Better for Children. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. Palmer, S. 2009. What Is Toxic Childhood. In: House, R., & Loewenthal, D. (eds.), Childhood, Well-Being, and a Therapeutic Ethos. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  14. Palmer, S. 2015. Toxic Childhood: How the Modern World Is Damaging Our Children and What We Can Do About It. London: Orion Books.Google Scholar
  15. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. 1973. Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sointu, E. 2005. The Rise of an Ideal: Tracing Changing Discourses of Wellbeing. Sociological Review, 53, 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor, D. 2011. Wellbeing and Welfare: A Psychosocial Analysis of Being Well and Doing Well Enough. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 777–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. UNICEF. 1989. UN Convention of the Rights of the Child (Online). UNICEF. Available https://www.unicef.org/rightsite/237.htm. Accessed 12 March 2018.
  19. Vincent, C. 2017. “The Children Have Only Got One Education and You Have to Make Sure It’s a Good One”: Parenting and Parent–School Relations in a Neoliberal Age. Gender and Education, 29, 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Psychological and Social SciencesYork St John UniversityYorkUK
  2. 2.School of Social Sciences, Humanities and LawTeesside UniversityMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations