Export Specialization by Technological Intensity: The Case of the Baltic States

  • Asta SabonieneEmail author
  • Akvile Cibinskiene
  • Irena Pekarskiene
  • Rozita Susniene
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 10/2)


The article is directed to evaluation of the export specialization in the Baltic States and revelation of the main differences by the aspect of technological intensity in commodity groups with revealed comparative advantage. The approach of revealed comparative advantage was employed to identify the commodity groups that are capable of successfully competing in the global market. The purpose of this research is to determine whether exports of the Baltic States are capable of achieving comparative advantage in the commodity groups that occupy major shares in the overall export structure and to find out how the exports are distributed by technological intensity of produced goods. The results of the empirical study have disclosed that the Baltic States have quite similar export specialization with large shares of raw material-intensive and labour-intensive goods in their total exports. The category of difficult-to-imitate research-intensive goods also occupies a visible share, but the states do not have any comparative advantage in production of these goods. Similarities in the export structure disclose that a more sustained way to compete in global markets can be achieved by increasing diversity of the exports of the Baltic States and by enlarging the shares of difficult-to-imitate research-intensive, capital-intensive and easy-to-imitate research-intensive goods.


Exports Commodity groups Revealed comparative advantage Technological intensity 


  1. Amir, M. (2000). Export specialization and competitiveness of the Malaysian manufacturing: Trends, challenges and prospects. 5th annual conference on international trade education and research, Melbourne. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from
  2. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 119, 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banterle, A. (2005). Competitiveness and agro-food trade: An empirical analysis in the European Union. Retrieved November 18, 2016, from
  4. Benedictis, L., & Tamberi, M. (2001). A note on the Balassa index of revealed comparative advantage. Retrieved October 14, 2016, from
  5. Bernatonyte, D., & Normandiene, A. (2009). Estimation of trade specialization: The case of Baltic States. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 2, 7–17.Google Scholar
  6. Bruneckiene, J., & Paltanaviciene, D. (2012). Measurement of export competitiveness of the Baltic States by composite index. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 1, 50–62.Google Scholar
  7. Erlat, G., & Erlat, H. (2008). How has specialization in Turkish exports evolved over time? A study based on Galtonian regressions. Retrieved November 18, 2016, from
  8. Havrila, I., & Gunawardana, P. (2003). Analysing comparative advantage and competitiveness: An application to Australian’s textile and clothing industries. Australian Economic Papers, 42(1), 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hilmola, O. P. (2013). From bubble to sustainable economy in the Baltic States. Transport and Telecommunication, 14(3), 237–249.Google Scholar
  10. Hoen, A. R., & Oosterhaven, J. (2006). On the measurement of comparative advantage. The Annals of Regional Science, 40, 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lall, S. (2000). The technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985-98. Oxford Development Studies, 28(3), 337–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Business Review, 5(1), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pilinkiene, V. (2014). Evaluation of international competitiveness using the reveal comparative advantage indices: The case of the Baltic States. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 5(13), 353–359.Google Scholar
  14. Prasad, R. N. (2004). Fiji’s export competitiveness: A comparison with selected small island developing states. Reserve Bank of Fiji, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  15. Remeikiene, R., Startiene, G., & Dumciuviene, D. (2015). Assessment of the industry competitiveness of the Baltic States in the EU during the period of economic recession. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 21(1), 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Saboniene, A. (2009). Lithuanian export competitiveness: Comparison with other Baltic States. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 2, 49–57.Google Scholar
  17. Staehr, K. (2015). Economic growth and convergence in the Baltic States: Caught in a middle income trap? Retrieved November 15, 2016, from
  18. Stefaniak-Kopoboru, J., & Kuczewska, J. (2016). Export specialization in services of the visegrad countries. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 11(2), 265–284.Google Scholar
  19. United Nations. (2002). Trade and development report. Retrieved October 16, 2016, from

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asta Saboniene
    • 1
    Email author
  • Akvile Cibinskiene
    • 1
  • Irena Pekarskiene
    • 1
  • Rozita Susniene
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics and BusinessKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations