Advertisement

Assessed Probability of Risks in Dependence on Innovative Project Description

  • A. D. KornilovaEmail author
  • N. V. Shekhova
  • N. N. Belanova
  • E. V. Savoskina
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

Development and implementation of the innovation project involve significant risks, which require taking measures to assess the probability of risks and identify possible losses. In this work, the systematization and risk assessment of innovation activity were carried out using the example of organizations of the Russian Federation. In the course of this study, the authors revealed that the greatest risks are associated with the non-return of borrowed funds (75.28%), lack of external investment (71.99%), operational (technical) problems (76.03%), and failure to sell the product or technology of the innovation project (71.59%). All these threats are inherent in basic risks of the innovation project. Among the specific risks can be identified the risk of conservation—78.02%, and the risk of imitation of competitors by the company’s patented innovations, copying of the innovation project—62.03%. Calculation of average risk values shows that, depending on the nature of innovation activity, the level of the probability of risks undergoes significant changes. So, for example, the greatest changes in values are peculiar to specific risks (72.63–39.39%). The smallest dynamics of average values is typical for risks securing property rights (55.7–62.66%). According to the results of calculations, the authors proposed measures for risk reduction with the greatest probability. In addition to traditional methods (hedging, limitation, insurance, etc.), it is advisable to use special measures such as protection of information on innovations, staff development, external consulting, verification of prospective partners for innovation, and improvement of quality management systems.

Keywords

Innovation risks Innovation projects Risk assessment Types of risks Risk management Risk reduction methods 

References

  1. Artemenko, V.B.: Integrated innovation risk assessment. Risk Manag. 1, 5–20 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. Asaul, A.N.: National strategy of innovative development. Econ. Revival Russia 1(23), 4–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Belanova, N.N.: Problems of Innovative Development in Construction. Economic Aspects of the Construction Complex Management in Modern Conditions Samara, pp. 166–170 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. Belanova, N.N.: The state and innovative development of the economy. Topical issues of economics and finance in the current challenges of the Russian and world economy. In: Materials of the II-th International Scientific and Practical Conference Kursk, pp. 392–396 (2014)Google Scholar
  5. Chirkunova, E.K.: Diversification of the industrial complex as a factor in the innovative development of the territory. Econ. Manage. Prob. Solutions 6, 4–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. Chirkunova, E.К., Kireeva, E.E., Kornilova, A.D., Belanova, N.N.: Innovative development of the building complex on the basis of environmental and energy-efficient technologies. In: International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2016 “SMART City”, MATEC Web of Conferences 106, 08002 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. Dmitrienko, A.V.: Classification of the innovation project parameters. Actual Prob. Econ. Manage. 3(15), 28–33 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. Domnina, S.V., Savoskina, E.V., Shekhova, N.V.: On innovative decisions in the investment-construction cycle. Procedia Eng. 153, 741–746 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farooq, M., Thaheem, M., Arshad, H.: Improving the risk quantification under behavioural tendencies: a tale of construction projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 3, 414–428 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Golichenko, O.G.: National innovation system: from concept to methodology. Issues Econ. 7, 35–50 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. Golichenko, O.G.: The balance of externalities and internal effects in national innovation systems. In: Arkhipova M., Sirotin V., Dameri R.P., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, pp. 223–230. University Of Genoa, Genoa (2015)Google Scholar
  12. GOST R 54869-2011: Project management. Requirements for project management. URL: http://gostrf.com/normadata/1/4293797/4293797785.pdf. Accessed 30 April 2018
  13. Karzhaev, A.T.: Innovative Venture Capital Risks and Management. Economics, Moscow (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Kornilova, A.D.: Management of Regional Infrastructure to Stimulate Innovation. Actual Problems of Agrarian Science and Ways to Solve Them: A Collection of Scientific Papers Kinel, pp. 811–814 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. Korol, S.P.: Innovative development of the construction industry as an economic category of the management object. Reg. Econ. Manage. Electron. Sci. J. 1 (2017). URL: http://eee-region.ru/article/4501/. Accessed 10 April 2018
  16. Kudryashova, O.V.: Development of the Risk Management System for R&D at the Industrial Enterprise: Monograph (2014)Google Scholar
  17. Kulikova, E.E.: Upravlenie riskami: innovatsionnyy aspekt (Risk Management: Innovation Aspect). Berator, Moscow (2008)Google Scholar
  18. Lane, R., Bettini, Y., McCallum, T., Head, B.W.: The interaction of risk allocation and governance arrangements in innovative urban storm water and recycling projects. Landscape Urban Plann. 164, 37–48 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Likhach, N.A., Savoskina, E.V.: Evaluation of the investment project efficiency taking into account the risk and uncertainty. Econ. Property Manage. 1, 34–40 (2015)Google Scholar
  20. National Standard of the Russian Federation Risk Management Standard: Risk Assessment Methods. GOST R/31010 — 2011 (ISO/IEC 31010:2009 Risk management—Risk assessment techniques (IDT). URL: www.sibfana.ru/files/ГOCTP20ИCO31010-2011_Meтoдыoцeнкиpиcкa.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2018
  21. Pomulev, A.A.: Risk Management of Small Business. LAPLAMBERT, Academic Publishing, Germany (2012)Google Scholar
  22. Pribytkova, G.V.: Risk analysis and assessment at manufacturing enterprises in the process of investment design. Bull. Moscow State Tech. Univ. 8(2), 300–305 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. Qazi, A., Quigley, J., Dickson, A., et al.: Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects. Int. J. Project Manage. 7, 1183–1198 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rudnik, K., Deptuła, A.: System with probabilistic fuzzy knowledge base and parametric inference operators in risk assessment of innovative projects. Expert Syst. Appl. 17–18, 6365–6379 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Savoskina, E.V., Burlakova, O.D.: Measures of administrative impacts used in the process of implementing the investment project (based on the example of construction organizations in the Samara region). Bull. Univ. 4, 141–147 (2017)Google Scholar
  26. Subbotin, M., Bianchi, A., Bombarda, F.: Preliminary risks analysis of the IGNITOR Project realization phase. Fusion Eng. Des. 124, 1246–1250 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. D. Kornilova
    • 1
    Email author
  • N. V. Shekhova
    • 2
  • N. N. Belanova
    • 1
  • E. V. Savoskina
    • 2
  1. 1.Samara State University of EconomicsSamaraRussia
  2. 2.Samara State Technical UniversitySamaraRussia

Personalised recommendations