Advertisement

Emotions, Reflexivity and the Long Haul: What We Do About How We Feel About Climate Change

  • Jo Hamilton
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

A range of group work methodologies exist to acknowledge, explore and encourage the processing of the complex, and sometimes contradictory emotions aroused by issues of social and environmental concerns. These reflexive methodologies vary in intensity and accessibility and lie at the interface of psychological and social approaches to climate change. This chapter will give an overview of methodologies used in the UK by civil society organisations. It will summarise existing research, and present initial findings from interviews with facilitators about what they feel their methods can achieve. It will conclude by reflecting on the role of these methodologies for engaging with, and sustaining action on, climate change.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank all the facilitators who were interviewed, for their contribution of time and expertise, and to my supervisors Hilary Geoghegan and Giuseppe Feola. I would also like to thank those who commented on earlier drafts: Paul Hoggett, Rosie Robison and Joe Butler.

References

  1. Adams, M. (2016). Ecological crisis, sustainability and the psychosocial subject: Beyond behaviour change. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Albrecht, G., Sartore, G.-M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., et al. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change. Australian Psychiatry, 15 (Supplement). S95–S98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks, S. (2012). Inner Transition survey results. Transition Network. http://www.transitionnetwork.org/resources/inner-transition-survey-results. Accessed 12 June 2016.
  5. Barrett, B., Grabow, M., Middlecamp, C., Mooney, M., Checovich, M., Converse, A., et al. (2016). Mindful climate action: Health and environmental co-benefits from mindfulness-based behavioral training. Sustainability, 8, 1040.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bondi, L. (2005). Making connections and thinking through emotions: Between geography and psychotherapy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geography, 30(4), 433–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups and other papers. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, G., & Pickerill, J. (2009). Space for emotion in the spaces of activism. Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Büchs, M., Hinton, E., & Smith, G. (2015). ‘It helped me sort of face the end of the world’: The role of emotions for third sector climate change engagement initiatives. Environmental Values, 24(5), 621–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doppelt, B. (2016). Transformational resilience: How building human resilience to climate disruption can safeguard society and increase wellbeing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Gould, D. (2015). When your data make you cry. In H. Flam & J. Kleres (Eds.), Methods of exploring emotions (pp. 163–171). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Head, L. (2016). Hope and grief in the anthropocene: Reconceptualising human nature relations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—From domestic to political terror. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Hobson, K. (2008). Reasons to be cheerful: Thinking sustainably in a (climate)changing world. Geography Compass, 2(1), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoggett, P., & Randall, R. (2016). Sustainable activism: Managing hope and despair in social movements. Open Democracy.net. Available from: OpenDemocracy.net/transformation/paul-hoggett-rosemary-randall/sustainable-activism-managing-hope-and-despair-in-socia. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  16. Hollis-Walker, L. (2012). Change processes in emotion-focused therapy and the work that reconnects. Ecopsychology, 4(1), 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing qualitative research differently: Free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Holmes, M. (2010). The emotionalization of reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnstone, C. (2002). Reconnecting with our world. In A. Chesner & H. Hahn (Eds.), Creative advances in groupwork (pp. 186–216). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. King, D. (2005). Sustaining activism through emotional reflexivity. In H. Flam & D. King (Eds.), Emotions and social movements (pp. 150–169). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Lertzman, R. (2015). Environmental melancholia. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lertzman, R., & Norgaard, K. (2011). A dialog between Renee Lertzman and Kari Norgaard. Ecopsychology, 3(1), 5–9.Google Scholar
  23. Lilley, R., Whitehead, M., Howell, R., Jones, R., & Pykett, J. (2016). Mindfulness, behaviour change and engagement in environmental policy. Aberystwyth University. Available from: https://changingbehaviours.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/mindfulnessreportgapfinal.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018 [Online].
  24. MacNamara, L. (2012). People and permaculture. East Meon, Hampshire, UK: Permanent Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Macy, J., & Brown, M. (2015). Coming back to life. The updated guide to the work that reconnects. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Macy, J., & Johnstone, C. (2012). Active hope: How to face the mess we’re in without going crazy. Novato, CA: New World Library.Google Scholar
  27. Mindfulness All-Party Parliamentary Group (MAPPG). (2015). Mindful Nation UK report. Available from: http://www.themindfulnessinitiative.org.uk/images/reports/Mindfulness-APPG-Report_Mindful-Nation-UK_Oct2015.pdf. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  28. Moore, K. (2017). (Re)Politicising climate change engagement: A case study of the Carbon Literacy Project. Masters dissertation [online]. Available from: http://www.carbonliteracy.com/research/. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  29. Moser, S. (2016). Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say? WIRES Climate Change, 7, 345–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Navigate Co-operative. https://navigate.org.uk/. Accessed 2 June 2018 [Online].
  31. Norgaard, K. M. (2011). Living in denial: Climate change, emotions and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Power, C. (2016). The integrity of process: Is inner transition sufficient? Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1), 347–363.  https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i1.538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prentice, H. (2003). Cosmic walk: Awakening the ecological self. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 1(1), 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prentice, H. (2012). ‘Heart and Soul’: Inner and outer within the transition movement. In M.-J. Rust & N. Totton (Eds.), Vital signs (pp. 175–190). London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
  35. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2010). Ethical doings in naturecultures. Ethics, Place and Environment, 13(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Randall, R. (2009). Loss and climate change: The cost of parallel narratives. Ecopsychology.  https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Randall, R., & Brown, A. (2015). In time for tomorrow? The carbon conversations handbook. Stirling, Scotland: Surefoot effect.Google Scholar
  38. Richards, E. C. (2017). The carbon literacy: Knowledge (CLK) E-learning effectiveness report. Masters dissertation online at: http://www.carbonliteracy.com/research/. Accessed 12 June 2018.
  39. Rucchetto, A., & Poland, B. (2015). Lessons from inner transition in Canada. Transition Network guest blog [online]. Available from: https://transitionnetwork.org/news-and-blog/guest-blog-by-anne-rucchetto-and-blake-poland-lessons-from-inner-transition-in-canada/. Accessed 14 June 2017.
  40. Rust, M. J. (2008). Climate on the couch. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 6(3), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Seed, J., Macy, J., Fleming, P., & Naess, A. (1988). Thinking like a mountain: Towards a council of all beings. Gabriola Island, BC, Canada: New Catalyst Books.Google Scholar
  42. Seeds for Change: https://seedsforchange.org.uk/. Accessed 2 June 2018 [Online].
  43. Stock Whitaker, D. (2001). Using groups to help people (2nd ed.). Hove, UK: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Stoll-Kleemann, S., O’Riordan, T., & Jaeger, C. (2001). The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: Evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environmental Change, 11, 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tripod Training: https://tripodtraining.org/. Training, facilitation and mediation for groups working on social justice. Accessed 2 June 2018 [Online].
  46. Weintrobe, S. (Ed.). (2013). Engaging with climate change: Psychoanalytic and interdisciplinary perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Weller, F. (2015). The wild edge of sorrow: Rituals of renewal and the sacred work of grief. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  48. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitehead, M., Jones, R., Lilley, R., Pykett, J., Howell, R. (2017). Neuroliberalism: Behavioural government in the twenty-first century. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jo Hamilton
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental Science, School of Geology, Archeology and Environmental ScienceUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations