Advertisement

Mechanism and Kinetics in Homogeneous Catalysis: A Computational Viewpoint

  • Jeremy N. HarveyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Challenges and Advances in Computational Chemistry and Physics book series (COCH, volume 29)

Abstract

The use of computational methods based on electronic structure theory and statistical mechanics to study reaction mechanisms and kinetics in homogeneous catalysis, especially organometallic catalysis and organocatalysis, is reviewed. The chapter focuses mostly on examples from the authors’ own group, published over the last two decades, and discusses progress and remaining challenges. It is argued that while it plays a valuable role in mechanistic studies, computation is not yet able to replace experimental studies.

Keywords

Reaction mechanisms Organocatalysis Organometallic catalysis Computational accuracy Synergy with experiment 

References

  1. 1.
    Jencks WP (1976) Enforced general acid-base catalysis of complex reactions and its limitations. Acc Chem Res 9:425–432.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar50108a001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Landis CR, Halpern J (1987) Asymmetric hydrogenation of methyl-(Z)-α-acetamidocinnamate catalyzed by {1,2-bis(phenyl-o-anisyl)phosphino)ethan}rhodium(I): kinetics, mechanism, and origin of enantioselection. J Am Chem Soc 109:1746–1754.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00240a025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gonzalez JA, Ogba OM, Morehouse GF, Rosson N, Houk KN, Leach AG, Cheong PHY, Burke MD, Lloyd-Jones GC (2016) MIDA boronates are hydrolysed fast and slow by two different mechanisms. Nat Chem 8:1067–1075.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2571CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas AA, Denmark SE (2016) Pre-transmetalation intermediates in the Suzuki-Miyaura reaction revealed: the missing link. Science 352:329–332.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas AA, Wang H, Zahrt AF, Denmark SE (2017) Structural, kinetic, and computational characterization of the elusive Arylpalladium(II)boronate complexes in the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction. J Am Chem Soc 139:3805–3821.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b13384CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noyori R, Richmond JP (2013) Ethical conduct in chemical research and publishing. Adv Synth Catal 355:3–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201201128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harvey J, Brichard MH, Viehe HG (1993) Electrophilic ene-type reactions of phenyl vinyl sulfoxide with alkenes. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1:2275–2280.  https://doi.org/10.1039/P19930002275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harvey JN, Viehe HG (1995) 3-thio-claisen rearrangement of the allyl vinyl sulfonium ion. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 2345–2346.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c39950002345
  9. 9.
    Aggarwal VK, Harvey JN, Richardson J (2002) Unravelling the mechanism of epoxide formation from sulfur ylids and aldehydes. J Am Chem Soc 124:5747–5756.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja025633nCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdur-Rashid K, Clapham S, Hadzovic A, Harvey JN, Lough AJ, Morris RH (2002) Mechanism of the hydrogenation of ketones catalyzed by trans-dihydrido(diamine)ruthenium(II) complexes. J Am Chem Soc 124:15104–15118.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja016817pCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aggarwal VK, Richardson J (2003) The complexity of catalysis: origins of enantio- and diastereocontrol in sulfur ylide mediated epoxidation reactions. Chem Commun 2644–2651.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b304625g
  13. 13.
    Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H (2010) A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J Chem Phys 132:154104.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3382344CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Riplinger C, Pinski P, Becker U, Valeev EF, Neese F (2016) Sparse maps—a systematic infrastructure for reduced-scaling electronic structure methods. II. Linear scaling domain based pair natural orbital coupled cluster theory. J Chem Phys 144:024109.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4939030
  15. 15.
    Truhlar DG (1998) Basis-set extrapolation. Chem Phys Lett 194:45–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00866-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu Z, Patel C, Harvey JN, Sunoj RB (2017) Mechanism and reactivity in the Morita–Baylis–Hillman reaction: the challenge of accurate computations. Phys Chem Chem Phys 19:30647–30657.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp06508fCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    For one example of a modern approach to archving quantum chemistry results, see the ioChem-BD project. https://www.iochem-bd.org/
  18. 18.
    Leyssens T, Peeters D, Harvey JN (2008) Origin of enantioselective hydrogenation of ketones by RuH2(diphosphine)(diamine) catalysts: a theoretical study. Organometallics 27:1514–1523.  https://doi.org/10.1021/om700940mCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dub PA, Henson NJ, Martin RL, Gordon JC (2014) Unravelling the mechanism of the asymmetric hydrogenation of acetophenone by [RuX2(diphosphine)(1,2-diamine)] catalysts. J Am Chem Soc 136:3505–3521.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja411374jCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pavlova A, Meijer EJ (2012) Understanding the role of water in aqueous ruthenium-catalyzed transfer hydrogenation of ketones. ChemPhysChem 13:3492–3496.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201200454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tan EHP, Lloyd-Jones GC, Harvey JN, Lennox AJJ, Mills BM. [(RCN)2PdCl2]-catalyzed alkene isomerization: selective inhibition of migration reveals a non-hydride pathway for E/Z interconversion. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:9602–9606.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201103947
  22. 22.
    Robiette R, Aggarwal VK, Harvey JN (2007) Mechanism of the Morita-Baylis-Hillman reaction: a computational investigation. J Am Chem Soc 129:15513–15525.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0717865CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harvey JN (2010) Ab initio transition state theory for polar reactions in solution. Faraday Discuss 145:487–505.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b907340jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plata RE, Singleton DA (2015) A case study of the mechanism of alcohol-mediated Morita Baylis–Hillman reactions. The importance of experimental observations. J Am Chem Soc 137:3811–3826.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja5111392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ho J, Coote ML (2010) A universal approach for continuum solvent pKa calculations: are we there yet? Theor Chem Acc 125:3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-009-0667-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lau JKC, Deubel DV (2006) Hydrolysis of the anticancer drug cisplatin: pitfalls in the interpretation of quantum chemical calculations. J Chem Theory Comput 2:103–106.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ct050229aCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Besora M, Vidossich P, Lledos A, Ujaque G, Maseras F (2018) Calculation of reaction free energies in solution: a comparison of current approaches. J Phys Chem A 122:1392–1399.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Besora M, Maseras F (2018) Microkinetic modeling in homogeneous catalysis. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 8 (in press).  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1372

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and Division of Quantum Chemistry and Physical ChemistryKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations