Advertisement

Sustainability Assessment of Manufacturing Organizations Based on Indicator Sets: A Formal Concept Analysis

  • Yasamin EslamiEmail author
  • Michele Dassisti
  • Hervé Panetto
  • Mario Lezoche
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11231)

Abstract

Organizations are struggling to survive in today’s competitive market. They are mostly obliged to meet customers’ expectations and demand for sustainable products from one side and comply with governmental rules and regulations regarding energy, resources, materials, etc. on the other side. Therefore, measuring their sustainability performance and trying to keep up with the competitors is essential for their future development. Consequently, organizations’ perception of operational sustainability can reveal their strategies on how to be sustainable, endeavouring the three pillars of economic, environmental and social. The present work investigates the role of indicators’ choice and their meaning for sustainability assessment of manufacturing organizations. To this point, an analysis is conducted on the sustainability assessment of 100 manufacturing organizations using GRI indicators for assessing their sustainability state. A Formal Concept Analysis was run to look over the indicators and their interpretations to reach a given degree of sustainability of the organization.

Keywords

Sustainability assessment Sustainable organization Indicator-based sustainability assessment Formal Concept Analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Hacking, T., Guthrie, P.: A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 28, 73–89 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hardi, P., Zdan, T.: The Bellagio principles for assessment. In: Assessing Sustainable Development: Principles in Practice (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sala, S., Ciuffo, B., Nijkamp, P.: A systemic framework for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 119, 314–325 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S.: State-of-the-art report on simulation and indicators. D7 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lundin, M.: Indicators for measuring the sustainability of urban water systems - a life cycle approach (2003). http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/421-indicators-for-measuring-the-sustainability-of-urban-water-systems-a-life-cycle-approach
  6. 6.
    Mayer-Spohn, O.: Sustainable development indicators within the German water industry: a case study. Chalmers tekniska högskola (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Corbire-Nicollier, T., Blanc, I., Erkman, S.: Towards a global criteria-based framework for the sustainability assessment of bioethanol supply chains: application to the Swiss dilemma: is local produced bioethanol more sustainable than bioethanol imported from Brazil? Ecol. Ind. 11, 1447–1458 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joung, C.B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P., Feng, S.C.: Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecol. Ind. 24, 148–157 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wille, R.: Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: Rival, I. (ed.) Ordered Sets. ASIC, vol. 83, pp. 445–470. Springer, Dordrecht (1982).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7798-3_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mezni, H., Sellami, M.: Multi-cloud service composition using formal concept analysis. J. Syst. Softw. 134, 138–152 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.08.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wajnberg, M., Lezoche, M., Massé, B.A., Valtchev, P., Panetto, H.: Complex system tacit knowledge extraction through a formal method. INSIGHT – Int. Counc. Syst. Eng. (INCOSE) 20, 23–26 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1002/inst.12176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, D., Zhang, S., Zhai, Y.: Method for generating decision implication canonical basis based on true premises. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 8, 57–67 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0575-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yan, H., Zou, C., Liu, J., Wang, Z.: Formal concept analysis and concept lattice: perspectives and challenges. Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst. 8, 81–96 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAACS.2015.067710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Global Reporting Initiative (GRI): Sustainability Reporting Guidelines. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3.1Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2018
  15. 15.
    Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI): Index Family Overview. http://www.sustainability-index.com/dow-jonessustainability-indexes/index.jsp. Accessed 1 Dec 2018
  16. 16.
    ISO (International Organization for Standardization): Environmental Management-Environmental Performance Evaluation-Guidelines, ISO14031:1999(E), Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Labuschagne, C., Brent, A.C., van Erck, R.P.G.: Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. J. Clean. Prod. 13, 373–385 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2003.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Veleva, V., Ellenbecker, M.: Indicators of sustainable production: framework and methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 9, 519–549 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00010-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    UN-CSD (the United Nations Committee on Sustainable Development): Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies, 3rd edn. The United Nations, New York. Accessed 16 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schmidt, W.-P., Taylor, A.: Ford of Europe’s product sustainability index. In: 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, p. 6 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dreher, J., Lawler, M., Stewart, J., Strasorier, G., Thorne, M.: GM metrics for sustainable manufacturing (project report). Laboratory for Sustainable Business, MIT (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thompson, K.D.: Sustainable Manufacturing Indicator Repository (SMIR). https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/sustainable-manufacturing-indicator-repository-smir. 14 Jan 2018
  23. 23.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasamin Eslami
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michele Dassisti
    • 1
  • Hervé Panetto
    • 2
  • Mario Lezoche
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical, Mathematics and Management DMMMPolitecnico di BariBariItaly
  2. 2.Université de Lorraine, CNRS, CRANNancyFrance

Personalised recommendations