Advertisement

Entities in Patterned Process

  • David R. KellerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Global Justice book series (JUST, volume 19)

Abstract

‘Nature’ is here understood to denote all that is not supernatural, including human artifacts. The dominant ontology of nature in our time is mechanism. However, it is an inadequate ontology and should be replaced by a superior alternative: organicism. In order to better understand the mechanical view of nature, it will help to review Aristotle’s four “causes”. Aristotle identified four kinds of cause, or explanatory reason, that contribute to explaining natural and artefactual objects: material, efficient, formal and final. Protoecology focused primarily on the latter two with the idea that each thing has an essential nature (its formal cause) and a supernatural purpose (its final or teleological cause). Scientific ecology dispenses with these in favor of the first two causes. The image is that of nature as a machine, the movements of which are strictly a result of the materials comprising it and antecedent efficient causes. This means that everything can in principle be explained in terms of material and efficient causes alone. A mechanical clock, with its gears and springs, illustrates the idea. Every movement of the hands of the clock is causally determined by the internal mechanisms of the clock. The same is true of organisms too, including human beings, except that they also respond mechanistically to external stimuli—something a clock does not do. However, the behavior of humans, and perhaps other animals, is arguably not purely mechanical in the way that the growth and phototropism of a plant presumably are. We experience subjectivity, instanced by sensation and thought, by means of which we can intentionally create novelty. This creative action is inherently unpredictable and so isn’t capturable by the clock metaphor. Consequently, another metaphysics is required: Organicism.

References

  1. Botkin, Daniel B. 1990. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Callicott, J.Baird. 1994. The Role of Technology in the Evolving Concept of Nature. In Ethics and Environmental Policy: Theory Meets Practice, ed. Frederick Ferré and Peter Hartel, 58–83. Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carlson, Scott. 2013. After Catastrophe. The Chronicle Review (May 10): B6–B9.Google Scholar
  4. Carter, Virginia. 1997. Wetland Hydrology, Water Quality, and Associated Functions. United States Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 2425 (March). http://water.usgs.gov/nwsum/WSP2425/hydrology.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2011.
  5. Clements, Frederic E. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. The Carnegie Institution of Washington Publication No. 242. Washington, D.C.: The Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
  6. Clements, Frederic E. 1934. The Relict Method in Dynamic Ecology. Journal of Ecology 22: 39–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clements, Frederic E. 1936. Nature and Structure of the Climax. Journal of Ecology 24: 252–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clements, Frederic E., and Victor E. Shelford. 1939. Bioecology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Conard, Henry S. trans. 1951. The Background of Plant Ecology. A translation of Anton, Kerner. (1863). The Plant Life of The Danube Basin. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crutzen, Paul. J. 2002. Geology of Mankind. Nature 415(January 31): 23.Google Scholar
  11. Curtis, John T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Darling, Frank Frasier. 1937. A Herd of Red Deer: A Study in Animal Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Darwin, Charles. 1981. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Darwin, Charles. 1998 (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. de Laplante, Kevin. 2004. Toward and More Expansive Conception of Ecological Science. Biology and Philosophy 19: 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Descartes, René. 1991. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. The Correspondence, vol. 3, trans. and eds. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Descartes, René. 2006. In Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings. trans. and eds. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, and Dugald Murdoch. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elger, Frank E. 1947. Arid Southeast Oahu Vegetation, Hawaii. Ecological Monographs 17: 383–435.Google Scholar
  19. Elton, Charles S. 1927. Animal Ecology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Ereshefsky, Marc. 2001. The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evernden, Neil. 1992. The Social Creation of Nature. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ferré, Frederick. 1988. Philosophy of Technology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Ferré, Frederick. 1994. Personalistic Organicism: Paradox or Paradigm? In Philosophy and the Natural Environment: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 36, ed. Robin Attfield and Andrew Belsey, 59–73. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferré, Frederick. 1996. Being and Value: Toward a Constructive Postmodern Metaphysics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ferré, Frederick. 2001. Living and Value: Toward a Constructive Postmodern Ethics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gallup Jr., Gordon C. 1970. Chimpanzees: Self-Recognition. Science 167: 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gleason, Henry A. 1917. The Structure and Development of the Plant Association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 43: 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleason, Henry A. 1926. The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 53: 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gleason, Henry A. 1939. The Individualistic Concept of the Plant Association. American Midland Naturalist 21: 92–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Golley, Frank B. 1993. A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum of the Parts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hagen, Joel B. 1992. An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hubbell, Stephen P. 1997. A Unified Theory of Biogeography and Relative Species Abundance and Its Application to Tropical Rain Forests and Coral Reefs. Coral Reefs 16 (Suppl): S9–S21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hubbell, Stephen P. 2001. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hume, David. 1978. In A Treatise of Human Nature, 2nd, ed. P. H. Nidditch. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Keller, David R., and Frank B. Golley (eds.). 2000. The Philosophy of Ecology: From Science to Synthesis. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kerr, Richard A. 2007. Scientists Tell Policymakers We’re All Warming the World. Science 315 No. 5813 (February 9): 754–757.Google Scholar
  37. Kormondy, Edward J. 1974. Natural and Human Ecosystems. In Human Ecology, ed. I.I. Frederick Sargent, 27–43. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  38. Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Leopold, Aldo. 1939. A Biotic View of the Land. The Council Ring 1(12) (November 13): 1. From University of Wisconsin—Madison Archive, Leopold Papers 9/25/10-6 box 1.Google Scholar
  40. Liddell, Henry G., and Robert Scott. 1968. A Greek-English Lexicon, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lindeman, Raymond L. 1942. The Trophic-Dynamic Aspect of Ecology. Ecology 23: 399–418.Google Scholar
  42. Lowe, Victor. 1962. Understanding Whitehead. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mayr, Ernst. 1974. Teleological and Teleonomic, A New Analysis. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14: 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mayr, Ernst. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. McKeon, Richard (ed.). 1941. The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. McKibben, Bill. 1989. The End of Nature. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  47. McPhee, John. 1989. The Control of Nature. New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux.Google Scholar
  48. Merchant, Carolyn. 1990. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  49. Monod, Jacques. 1972. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. trans. and ed. Austryn Wainhouse . New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  50. Mumford, Lewis. 1970. The Myth of the Machine: The Pentagon of Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, Norman. 1979. The Sinking Ark: A New Look at the Problem of Disappearing Species. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Naess, Arne. 1985. The World of Concrete Contents. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy and the Social Sciences 28: 417–428.Google Scholar
  53. Newton, Isaac. 1979. Optiks. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  54. Newton, Isaac. 1999. The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. I. trans. and eds. Bernard Cohen and Anne Whitman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pahl-Wostl, Claudia. 1995. The Dynamic Nature of Ecosystems: Chaos and Order Entwined. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Phillips, John. 1931. The Biotic Community. The Journal of Ecology 19: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Phillips, John. 1934. Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts. Part I. The Journal of Ecology 22: 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Phillips, John. 1935a. Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts. Part II. The Journal of Ecology 23: 210–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Phillips, John. 1935b. Succession, Development, the Climax, and the Complex Organism: An Analysis of Concepts. Part III. The Journal of Ecology 23: 488–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pimm, Stuart L. 1991. The Balance of Nature? Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  61. Pound, Roscoe, and Frederic E. Clements. 1897. The Phytogeography of Nebraska, Part 1, General Survey, 2nd ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  62. Rachels, James. 1990. Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Revkin, Andrew C. 2009. Global Warming Is Delaying Ice Age, Study Finds. The New York Times (September 4): A16.Google Scholar
  64. Rorty, Richard. 1972. Relations, Internal and External. The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 7, 125–133. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Ruddiman, William E. 2005. How Did Humans First Alter Global Climate? Scientific American 292 No. 3 (March): 46–53.Google Scholar
  66. Simberloff, Daniel S. 1980. A Succession of Paradigms in Ecology: Essentialism to Materialism and Probabilism. Synthese 43: 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Slobodkin, Lawrence B. 1973. Is History a Consequence of Evolution? Perspectives in Ethology, vol. 3, eds. P. P. G. Bateson and Peter H. Klopfer, 233–255. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  68. Smothers, Ronald. 1995. Slopping the Hogs, the Assembly-Line Way. New York Times (January 30): A8.Google Scholar
  69. Sylvan, Richard. 1985. A Critique of Deep Ecology. Part II. Radical Philosophy 41: 1–22.Google Scholar
  70. Tansley, Arthur G. 1935. The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology 16: 284–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tobey, Ronald C. 1981. Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of American Plant Ecology, 1895-1955. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  72. Turner, Frederick. 1992. Natural Classicism: Essays on Literature and Science. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ulanowicz, Robert E. 2001. Personal communication. E-mail.Google Scholar
  74. Whitehead, Alfred N. 1967. Science and the Modern World. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. Whitehead, Alfred N. 1978. Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. Corrected Edition, eds. David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Whittaker, Robert H. 1953. A Consideration of the Climax Theory: The Climax as a Population and Pattern. Ecological Monographs 23: 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1965. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8: 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Salt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations