Twittersphere: A Digital Spatiality

  • Shekh MoinuddinEmail author
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)


The Twittersphere is a digital spatiality wherein different layers of digital attributes come together to shape a monotonous mediated atmosphere in the form of tweets and retweets. The Twittersphere functions through four attributes (namely tweet, retweet, like, and direct messages), and each have their own specific domain of work to reflect the construction of political reality.


Twitter Twittersphere Political Spatial–temporal Digital 


  1. Agranoff C, Tabin H (2011) Socially elected: how to win elections using social media. Pendant Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Castells M (1996) The rise of network society. Blackwell, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen MK, Risen JL (2010) How choice affects and reflects preferences: revising the free-choice paradigm. J Pers Soc Psychol 99(4):573–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chi F, Yang N (2010) Twitter in congress: outreach vs. transparency. Soc Sci Res Netw. Accessed 17 Oct 2011
  5. Ehrenberg R (2012) Social media sway: worries over political misinformation on Twitter attract scientists’ attention. Sci News 182(8):22–25. Last accessed 2 Sept 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliot AJ, Devine PG (1994) On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: dissonance as psychological discomfort. J Pers Soc Psychol 67(3):382–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deleuze G, Guattari F (1988) A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. Atlone, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Gainous J, Wagner KM (2011) Rebooting american politics: the internet revolution. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  9. Gainous J, Wagner KM (2014) Tweeting to power: the social media revolution in American politics. Oxford University Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Gayo-Avello D (2015) Political opinion. In: Mejova Y et al. (eds)Twitter: a digital socioscope. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerbaudo P (2012) Tweets and the street: social media and contemporary activism. Pluto Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey D (1989) The condition of post-modernity. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Hong S, Nodler N (2011) Does the early bird move the polls?: the use of the social media tool ‘Twitter’ by US politicians and its impact on public opinion. retrieved from Accessed 14 Jan 2019
  14. Kennedy D (2012) Twitter Talk: its search and trends can keep you up to speed. ABA J 98(9):33. Last accessed 7 Sept 2017
  15. Kumar S, Morestatter F, Liu H (2015) Analyzing Twitter data. In Mejova et al (eds) Twitter: a digital socioscope. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Lefebvre H (1991) The production of space (trans: Smith DN). Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. McCartney M (2011) We shouldn’t fear Facebook and Twitter. BMJ 324. Last accessed 23 Aug 2017
  18. Mejova Y et al (2015) Twitter: a Ddgital socioscope. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller G (2011a) Social scientists wade into the tweet stream. Am Assoc Adv Sci 333:1814–1815. Last accessed 27 Aug 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miller V (2011b) Understanding digital culture. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  21. Murthy D (2012) Towards a sociological understanding of social media: theorizing Twitter. Sociology 46(6):1059–1073. Last accessed 29 Sept 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Connor B et al (2010) From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In: Proceedings of the international conference on weblogs and social media. AAAI Press, pp. 122–129Google Scholar
  23. Samuels B (2011) Facebook, Twitter, YouTube—and Democracy. Am Assoc Univ Prof 97(4):32–34. Last accessed 20 Aug 2017
  24. Soja E (1996) Third space: journey to Los Angles and other real and imagined places. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Sommers PM (2002) Is presidential greatness related to height?. Coll Math J 33(1):14–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Suresh K, Ramakrishnan C (2015) Twittering public sentiments: a predictive analysis of pre-poll twitter popularity of Prime Ministerial candidates for india elections 2014. Media Watch 6(2):238–254. Puri (Odisha), IndiaGoogle Scholar
  27. Williams CB, Gulati GJ (2008) The political impact of Facebook: evidence from the 2006 midterm elections and 2008 nomination contest. Polit Technol Rev (March):11–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Culture, Media and GovernanceJamia Millia IslamiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations