Advertisement

Applications Beyond Local Excision

  • Deborah S. Keller
Chapter

Abstract

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an advanced videoscopic endoluminal platform that blends single-incision laparoscopy with local excision techniques. Since its inception, TAMIS has been used increasingly worldwide as an alternative to traditional transanal excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of benign and early-stage rectal cancers in the distal and mid rectum. With the benefits and success of rectal lesion excision, the applications have continued to evolve. In this chapter, we review several applications of TAMIS beyond local excision, for performing established procedures in a minimally invasive transanal approach, facilitating new technology and the development of new approaches, and managing complications.

Keywords

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) TAMIS-ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (TaIPAA, TaPouch) Robotic TAMIS Vaginal access minimally invasive surgery (VAMIS) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) 

References

  1. 1.
    Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:775–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2200–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:301–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clancy C, Burke JP, Albert MR, O’Connell PR, Winter DC. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus standard transanal excision for the removal of rectal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:254–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1026–30; discussion 1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLemore EC, Weston LA, Coker AM, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign and malignant rectal neoplasia. Am J Surg. 2014;208:372–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maglio R, Muzi GM, Massimo MM, Masoni L. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): new treatment for early rectal Cancer and large rectal polyps-experience of an Italian center. Am Surg. 2015;81:273–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verseveld M, Barendse RM, Gosselink MP, Verhoef C, de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: impact on quality of life and functional outcome. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1184–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Buck van Overstraeten A, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A. Transanal completion proctectomy after total colectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: a modified single stapled technique. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:O141–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leo CA, Samaranayake S, Perry-Woodford ZL, et al. Initial experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis by transanal total mesorectal rectal excision and single-incision abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:1162–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Buck van Overstraeten A, Mark-Christensen A, Wasmann KA, et al. Transanal versus transabdominal minimally invasive (completion) proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: a comparative study. Ann Surg. 2017;266:878–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Yamaguchi T, Sano T. Transanal total pelvic exenteration: pushing the limits of transanal total mesorectal excision with transanal pelvic exenteration. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:647–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, et al. Complete transanal total mesorectal excision for lower rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60:872–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Sugihara T, Magishi A, Ono K, Yamaguchi T, Sano T. Transanal total pelvic exenteration with sphincter-preserving surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 May;61(5):641.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001031.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Albert M, et al. Vaginal access minimally invasive surgery (VAMIS): a new approach to hysterectomy. Surg Innov. 2015;22:344–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baekelandt J. Total vaginal NOTES hysterectomy: a new approach to hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(6):1088–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 May 22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baekelandt J, Cavens D. GelPOINT (applied medical) is a suitable port for transvaginal NOTES procedures. J Gynecol Surg. 2016;32(5):257–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Atallah S, Albert M, Debeche-Adams T, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): applications beyond local excision. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17:239–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Borstlap WA, Harran N, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA. Feasibility of the TAMIS technique for redo pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:5364–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ, et al. PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:858–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cirocco WC. The Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse: an operation for all ages. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1618–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Althoff A, Rowen R, Dakermandji M, Kelly J, Atallah S. Perineal rectosigmoidectomy combined with TAMIS rectopexy: a NOTES operation for rectal procidentia. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:815–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Al Furajii H, Cahill RA. TAMIS completion proctectomy and concomitant parastomal hernia repair with transperineal mesh fixation – a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2016;18:726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Al Furajii H, Cahill RA. Dual endolaparoscopic technique (DUET) for TAMIS proctectomy and concomitant parastomal hernia repair. Tech Coloproctol. 2016;20:67–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCarroll RH, Moore LJ. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for resection of retrorectal cyst. J Surg Case Rep. 2018;2018:rjy021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Warren CD, Hamilton AER, Stevenson ARL. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of rectal lesions with the da Vinci Xi (dVXi): technical considerations and video vignette. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1816-z.
  27. 27.
    Atallah S. Assessment of a flexible robotic system for endoluminal applications and transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): could this be the solution we have been searching for. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:809–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Erenler I, Aytac E, Bilgin IA, Baca B, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (R-TAMIS) with the da Vinci Xi system – a video vignette. Colorectal Dis. 2017;19:401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marks J, Ng S, Mak T. Robotic transanal surgery (RTAS) with utilization of a next-generation single-port system: a cadaveric feasibility study. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21:541–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Atallah S, Hodges A, Larach SW. Direct target NOTES: prospective applications for next generation robotic platforms. Tech Coloproctol. 2018;22:363–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bong JW, Lim SB. Transanal minimally invasive surgery as a treatment option for a completely occluded anastomosis after low anterior resection: a new approach to severe anastomotic stenosis. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018;  https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12599.
  32. 32.
    van Koperen PJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Rosman C, et al. The Dutch multicenter experience of the endo-sponge treatment for anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1379–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery for repair of rectourethral fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tobias-Machado M, Mattos PA, Reis LO, Juliano CA, Pompeo AC. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) to treat vesicorectal fistula: a new approach. Int Braz J Urol. 2015;41:1020–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cawich SO, Thomas DA, Mohammed F, Bobb NJ, Williams D, Naraynsingh V. A management algorithm for retained rectal foreign bodies. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11:684–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cawich SO, Mohammed F, Spence R, Albert M, Naraynsingh V. Colonic foreign body retrieval using a modified TAMIS technique with standard instruments and trocars. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2015;2015:815616.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Atallah S, Larach SW, Monson JR. Stereotactic navigation for TAMIS-TME. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2016;25:271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kneist W, Rink AD, Kauff DW, Konerding MA, Lang H. Topography of the extrinsic internal anal sphincter nerve supply during laparoscopic-assisted TAMIS TME: five key zones of risk from the surgeons’ view. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:71–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah S. Keller
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of SurgeryNewYork–Presbyterian, Columbia University Medical CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations