Advertisement

Board Games for Training Computational Thinking

  • Katerina TsaravaEmail author
  • Korbinian Moeller
  • Manuel Ninaus
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11385)

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) is a term widely used to describe algorithmic thinking and logic reasoning concepts and processes often related to computer programming. As such, CT as a cognitive ability builds on concepts and processes that derive from computer programming, but are applicable to wider real-life problems and STEM domains. CT has recently been argued to be a fundamental skill for 21st century education and an early academic success indicator that should be introduced and trained already in primary school education. Accordingly, we developed three life-size board games – Crabs & Turtles: A Series of Computational Adventures – that aim at providing an unplugged, gamified and low-threshold introduction to CT by presenting basic coding concepts and computational thinking processes to 8 to 9-year-old primary school children. For the design and development of these educational board games we followed a rapid prototyping approach. In the current study, we report results of an empirical evaluation of game experience of our educational board games with students of the target age group. In particular, we conducted quantitative analyses of player experience of primary school student participants. Results indicate overall positive game experience for all three board games. Future studies are planned to further evaluate learning outcomes in educational interventions with children.

Keywords

Computational Thinking Unplugged activities Board games 

References

  1. 1.
    Wing, J.M.: Computational Thinking. Theor. Comput. Sci. 49(3), 33 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wing, J.M.: Computational Thinking: What and Why? The Link - The Magazine of the Carnegie Mellon University School of Computer Science (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang, P.S.: From Computing to Computational Thinking, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brennan, Κ., Resnick, Μ.: New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In: Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Astrachan, O., Briggs, Α.: The CS principles principles project. ACM Inroads 3(2), 38 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haddad, R.J., Kalaani, Y.: Can computational thinking predict academic performance? In: Integrated STEM Education Conference Proceedings. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., Korb, J.T.: Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14(1), 5 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuomi, P., Multisilta, J., Saarikoski, P., Suominen, J.: Coding skills as a success factor for a society. Educ. Inf. Technol. 23(1), 419 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown, N.C.C., Sentance, S.U.E., Crick, T.O.M., Humphreys, S.: Restart: the resurgence of computer science in UK schools. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. 14(2), 9 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    European School Network Homepage: https://www.esnetwork.eu/. Accessed 6 May 2018
  11. 11.
    European Coding Initiative Homepage: http://www.allyouneediscode.eu/. Accessed 6 May 2018
  12. 12.
    Code.org Homepage: https://code.org. Accessed 6 May 2018
  13. 13.
    National Science Foundation Homepage: https://www.nsf.gov/. Accessed 6 May 2018
  14. 14.
    Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Pinkwart, N., Butz, M., Trautwein, U., Ninaus, M.: Training computational thinking: game-based unplugged and plugged-in activities in primary school. In: 11th European Conference on Games Based Learning Proceedings, ECGBL, ACPI, UK (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barsalou, L.W.: Grounded cognition. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tsarava, K., Moeller, K., Ninaus, M.: Training computational thinking through boar games: the case of crabs & turtles. Int. J. Serious Games 5(2), 25–44 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papert, S.: Logo Philosophy and Implementation (1999)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papert, S., Solomon, C.: Twenty Things To Do With a Computer (1971)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Echeverría, A., et al.: A framework for the design and integration of collaborative classroom games. Comput. Educ. 57(1), 1127 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grover, S., Pea, R.: Computational thinking in K-12: a review of the state of the field. Educ. Res. 42(1), 38 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pea, R.D., Kurland, D.M.: On the cognitive effects of learning computer programming. New Ideas Psychol. 2(2), 137 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fullerton, T.: Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsarava, K.: Programming in Greek with Python. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Poels, K., de Kort, Y.A.M., Ijsselsteijn, W.A.: D3.3: game experience questionnaire: development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institut für WissensmedienTübingenGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany
  3. 3.LEAD Graduate School & Research NetworkUniversity of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations