Advertisement

Shallow and Deep Gamification in Mathematics Trails

  • Iwan GurjanowEmail author
  • Miguel Oliveira
  • Joerg Zender
  • Pedro A. Santos
  • Matthias Ludwig
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11385)

Abstract

Mobile Math Trails for Europe (MoMaTrE) is an ongoing project with the objective of conceptualizing and developing a fully gamified platform for creating, organizing and executing mathematics trails. We present some early experimental results concerning the introduction of shallow gamification techniques in the platform and discuss our plans for adding other gamification elements.

Keywords

Mathematics trails Gamification Mobile 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Erasmus+ European project MoMaTrE, EC Project Number: 2017-1-DE01-KA203-003577 and Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) with reference UID/CEC/50021/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25(1), 54–67 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Labouriau, I.S.: Instrução Personalizada na Matemática Universitária. Boletim da SPM 64, 55–65 (2011)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sheldon, L.: The Multiplayer Classroom: Designing Coursework as a Game. Cengage Learning, Boston (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tekinbas, K.S., Torres, R., Wolozin, L., Rufo-Tepper, R., Shapiro, A.: Quest to Learn: Developing the School for Digital Kids. MIT Press, Cambridge (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bogost, I.: Why gamification is bullshit. In: The Gameful World - Approaches, Issues, Applications, pp. 65–80. MIT Press (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santos, P.A.: Gamification of a university course. In: Proceedings of SciTecIN 2015, Sciences and Technologies of Interaction, Coimbra (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shoaf, M., Pollak, H., Schneider, J.: Math Trails. COMAP, Lexington (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blane, D.C., Clarke, D.: A mathematics trail around the city of Melbourne. Monash Mathematics Education Centre, Monash University (1984)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ludwig, M., Jesberg, J., Weiss, D.: MathCityMap - a smartphone project to do math. University Library Dortmund (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wittmann, M.C., Flood, V.J., Black, K.E.: Algebraic manipulation as motion within a landscape. Educ. Stud. Math. 82(2), 169–181 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dicheva, D., Dichev, C.: Gamification in education: where are we in 2015? In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 1445–1454. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dickey, M.D.: Murder on Grimm Isle: the impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 42(3), 456–469 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sigala, M.: The application and impact of gamification funware on trip planning and experiences: the case of TripAdvisor’s funware. Electron. Mark. 25(3), 189–209 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iosup, A., Epema, D.: An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education. In: Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 27–32. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ibáñez, M.B., Di-Serio, A., Delgado-Kloos, C.: Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: a case study. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 7(3), 291–301 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Armstrong, M.B., Landers, R.N.: An evaluation of gamified training: using narrative to improve reactions and learning. Simul. Gaming 48(4), 513–538 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., Werder, K., Abe, J.: How to gamify? A method for designing gamification. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2017. University of Hawai’i at Manoa (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lieberoth, A.: Shallow gamification - testing psychological effects of framing an activity as a game. Games Cult. 10, 229–248 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI): the intrinsic motivation inventory. Scale description, http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/. Last Accessed 01 Oct 2018
  21. 21.
    Gurjanow, I., Ludwig, M.: Gamifying math trails with the Mathcitymap app: impact of points and leaderboard on intrinsic motivation. In: Aldon, G., Trgalova, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (ICTMT 2013), pp. 105–112, Lyon, France (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Niederle, M., Vesterlund, L.: Gender and competition. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3(1), 601–630 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zender, J., Ludwig, M.: The long-term effects of MathCityMap on the performance of German 15 year old students concerning cylindric tasks. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, CERME 2011, 6–10 February 2019, Uitrecht (2019, in Press)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bourgonjon, J., Valcke, M., Soetaert, R., Schellens, T.: Students’ perceptions about the use of video games in the classroom. Comput. Educ. 54(4), 1145–1156 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Essential video gamenews, p. 34. http://www.sell.fr/sites/default/files/essential_video_game_news_sell_2018-eng-hr.pdf. Last Accessed 01 Oct 2018
  26. 26.
    Quek, K.S.: Context for mathematical problem posing. In: Ee, J., Berinderjeet, K., Lee, N.H., Yeap, B.H. (eds.) New ‘Literacies’: Educational Response to a Knowledge-Based Society, Vol 1: Education, pp. 612–620. Educational Research Association of Singapore, Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muller, E.: Niagara Falls Math Trail. Department of Mathematics, Brock University (1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lucas, P., Martinho, C.: Stay awhile and listen to 3buddy, a co-creative level design support tool. In: Eighth International Conference on Computational Creativity, ICCC, Atlanta (2017)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hauge, J.B., et al.: Exploring context-aware activities to enhance the learning experience. In: Dias, J., Santos, P.A., Veltkamp, R.C. (eds.) GALA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10653, pp. 238–247. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71940-5_22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lenhart, A., Kahne, J., Middaugh, E., Macgill, A.R., Evans, C., Vitak, J.: Teens, video games, and civics: teens’ gaming experiences are diverse and include significant social interaction and civic engagement. In: Pew Internet & American Life Project (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iwan Gurjanow
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miguel Oliveira
    • 2
  • Joerg Zender
    • 1
  • Pedro A. Santos
    • 2
  • Matthias Ludwig
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics EducationUniversity of FrankfurtFrankfurt/MainGermany
  2. 2.INESC-ID & Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations