Advertisement

Robust Goal Programming with Interactive Fuzzy Coefficients

  • Masahiro InuiguchiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making book series (MCDM)

Abstract

In this paper, goal programming problems with interactive fuzzy coefficients are treated. Two types of targets can be expressed by fuzzy sets in goal programming problems with fuzzy coefficients. One is the ambiguous target whose true value is not known precisely and the other is the target distribution to which the fuzzy set of objective function values is brought close. Corresponding to the difference of targets, we use two kinds of deviations naturally obtained from the extension principle. On the other hand, to treat the interaction among fuzzy coefficients, we introduce oblique fuzzy vectors (OFVs). An OFV can be obtained from the expert knowledge about the behavior of coefficients as well as from the principal component analysis of the stored coefficient data. It is shown that linear functions with OFVs can be obtained easily. The goal programming problems are formulated based on the necessity measure maximization model. It is shown that the reduced programming problems can be solved by a bisection method together with a simplex method. Moreover, it is shown that the constraints of the reduced programming problems have special structures such as a dual block angular structure and a bordered angular structure so that some decomposition methods are applicable.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported partially by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18H01658.

References

  1. Dubey, D., Chandra, S., & Mehra, A. (2012). Fuzzy linear programming under interval uncertainty based on IFS representation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 188(1), 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Inuiguchi, M.: Approaches to linear programming problems with interactive fuzzy numbers. In: [2], 145–161 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. Inuiguchi, M., & Kume, Y. (1989). Modality goal programming problems (in Japanese). Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 32(5), 326–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Inuiguchi, M., & Kume, Y. (1991). Goal programming problems with interval coefficients and target intervals. European Journal of Operational Research, 52(3), 345–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Inuiguchi, M., & Ramík, J. (2000). Possibilistic linear programming: A brief review of fuzzy mathematical programming and a comparison with stochastic programming in portfolio selection problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111(1), 3–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inuiguchi, M., Ramik, J., & Tanino, T. (2003). Oblique fuzzy vectors and their use in possibilistic linear programming. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 135(1), 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lodwick, W. A., & Kacprzyk, Y. (Eds.). (2010). Fuzzy optimization: Recent advances and applications. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Mousazadeh, M., Torabi, S. A., & Zahiri, B. (2015). A robust possibilistic programming approach for pharmaceutical supply chain network design. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 82, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ramík, J., & Vlach, M. (2016). Intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming and duality: A level sets approach. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 15(4), 457–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Yaghin, R. G., Fatemi Ghomi, S. M. T., & Torabi, S. A. (2013). A possibilistic multiple objective pricing and lot-sizing model with multiple demand classes. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 231, 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityToyonaka, OsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations