Advertisement

Conditions Affecting the Professional and Project Training of Engineering Personnel

  • Margarita Yu. RaitinaEmail author
  • Larisa V. Smolnikova
  • Olga V. Gorskikh
  • Tatyana I. Suslova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 907)

Abstract

The article presents the results of the study aimed at identifying factors that affect the professional and project training of engineers in TUSUR. The authors focus on description of key factors that ensure a productive development of modern technologies for engineering, organize educational and cognitive activities for students. The level of education and training of highly qualified engineers are determined by the progress of students which depends on a number of motivational conditions: methodological support of educational process, informing students about the university life and background, relations with university teachers and administration, degree of satisfaction with the training in the university. The data analysis made it possible to establish an important factor in the competitiveness of TUSUR graduates at the labor market is graduates’ entrepreneurial activity, and conformity of acquired knowledge with the real needs of the economy. This is directly related to organization of the educational process, built according to the logic of positioning the university as an entrepreneurial institution in connection with the need to develop and apply innovative pedagogical technologies, methods for professional and project training of engineering personnel. Whereas the use of new design methods and techniques by the faculty in future specialists training in line with the declared ideology of the university makes it possible to effectively attract undergraduate students to further study in masters and postgraduate studies.

Keywords

Professional and project preparation Factors of professional training Project training Entrepreneurial high school Engineering personnel 

References

  1. 1.
    Gorskikh, O.V.: Parametry analiza i ocenki predstaviteljami vuzov i shkol kachestva vzaimodejstvija [Parameters of analysis and evaluation by representatives of universities and schools of the quality of interaction]. Vestn. TGU 358, 117–120 (2012). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gorskikh, O.V., Tanzeva, S.G.: Sostoyaniye vzaimodeystviya vuzov i shkol v regione [The state of interaction of universities and schools in the region]. In: Prozumentova, G. (ed.) Interaction of Universities and Schools for the Formation of an Open Educational Space: Potential, Problems, Management Problems, pp. 65–75. TML-Press, Tomsk (2013). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gorskikh, O.V., Pokrovskaya, E.M.: Kul’turno-obrazovatel’naja sreda universiteta i ee funkcii kak resursj effektivnogo mezhkul’turnogo vzaimodejstvija [Cultural and educational environment of the University and its functions as a resource for effective intercultural interaction]. Pedagog. J. 5, 60–72 (2014). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Il’in, G.L.: Kak obespechit’ kachestvo obuchenija v informacionnom obshhestve? [How to ensure the quality of education in the information society?]. Public Educ. 5, 131–135 (2011). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kolin, K.K.: Chelovecheskij potencial i inovacionnaja jekonomika [Human potential and innovative economy]. Bull. Russ. Acad. Nat. Sci. 3(2), 16–22 (2003). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Odarushchenko, O.I.: Osobennosti psikhologicheskogo zdorovia studentov [Features of psychological health of students]. Russ. Sci. J. 4(29), 266–276 (2012). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raitina, MYu., Pokrovskaya, E.M., Gorskikh, O.V.: Mezhdisciplinarnye podhody v obespechenii obrazovatel’nogo processa v vuze: osnovnye tendencii, celi, zadachi [Interdisciplinary approaches to the educational process in higher education: the main trends, goals, objectives]. Pedagog. Rev. 2, 7–11 (2014). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Selezneva, H.A.: Kachestvo vysshego obrazovanija kak obek tissledovanija [Quality of higher education as an object of study]. Issledovatel’skijcentr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov, Moscow (2003). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smol’nikova, L.V., Pokrovskaya, E.M., Larionova, A.V.: Sistemnaja integracija studentov v innovacionno-predprinimatel’skuju dejatel’nost’ [System integration of students in innovation and entrepreneurship]. TUSUR, Tomsk (2012). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suslova, T., Raitina, M.: Problems of education in the context of technoscience: tradition and innovation. In: Filchenko, A., Anikina, Z. (eds.) Linguistic and Cultural Studies: Traditions and Innovations (LKTI 2017). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 677, pp. 75–80. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H.: The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, New York (1975)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tomsk State University of Control Systems and RadioelectronicsTomskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations