Advertisement

Mistrust pp 13-31 | Cite as

Mistrusting the System

  • Florian Mühlfried
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes practices resulting from mistrust based on the experiences of outsiders with the state. In the present case, these outsiders are Tushetians, a community from a Georgian highland region located at the state’s periphery. The Soviet and post-Soviet administration of Tusheti was marked by an erratic policy that could not be anticipated by the local population. Dealing with a power that was mistrusted but could not be ignored, some Tushetians tried to reduce their dependence on this power. In these attempts, four modes of mistrust become apparent: revolt, escape, exclusion and a radical presentism.

Keywords

Georgia Rebellion Soviet Union Reservations 

References

  1. Albats, Yevgenia. 1995. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia—Past, Present, and Future. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  2. Ammon, Philipp. 2015. Georgien zwischen Eigenstaatlichkeit und russischer Okkupation: Die Wurzeln des russisch-georgischen Konflikts vom 18. Jahrhundert bis zum Ende der ersten georgischen Republik. Klagenfurt and Wien: Kitab.Google Scholar
  3. Banfield, Edward C. 1958. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beek, Jan. 2017. How Not to Fall in Love: Mistrust in Online Romance Scams. In Mistrust: Ethnographic Approximations, ed. F. Mühlfried, 49–69. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Day, Sophie, Evthymios Papataxiarchis, and Michael Stewart. 1999. Consider the Lilies of the Field. In Lilies of the Field: Marginal People Who Live for the Moment, ed. S. Day, E. Papataxiarchis, and M. Stewart, 1–24. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, Jacques. 2000. Of Hospitality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Figes, Orlando. 2007. The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin’s Russia. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  9. Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 1996. Signals from Below: Soviet Letters of Denunciation of the 1930s. The Journal of Modern History 68 (4): 831–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frevert, Ute. 2013. Vertrauensfragen: Eine Obsession der Moderne. München: Verlag C. H. Beck.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  13. Godelier, Maurice. 1999. The Enigma of the Gift. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gorlizki, Yoram. 2013. Structures of Trust After Stalin. Slavonic & East European Review 91 (1): 119–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hardin, Russell (ed.). 2004. Distrust. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Hartmann, Martin. 2011. Die Praxis des Vertrauens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Hauschild, Thomas. 2003. Magie und Macht in Italien: Über Frauenzauber, Kirche und Politik. Gifkendorf: Merlin-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Hörlin, Sinje. 2016. Figuren des Misstrauens. Konstanz: Konstanz University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hosking, Geoffrey. 2013. Trust and Distrust in the USSR: An Overview. The Slavonic and East European Review 91 (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jähnig, Wolfgang. 1983. Die Siedlungsplanung im ländlichen Raum der Sowjetunion mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Konzepts der “Agrostadt”. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, Stephen F. 1989. Marxism and Peasant Revolt in the Russian Empire: The Case of the Gurian Republic. The Slavonic and East European Review 67: 403–434.Google Scholar
  22. K’ik’nadze, Zurab. 1996. kartuli mitologia 1: jvari da saqmo [Georgian Mythology 1: The Cross and Its People]. Kutaisi: gelatis mecnierebata ak’ademiis shromebi.Google Scholar
  23. Ledeneva, Alena V. 2013. How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices That Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Luhmann, Niklas. 2014 [1968]. Vertrauen. Konstanz: UVK/Konstanz University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mühlfried, Florian. 2007. Von versteckten Schätzen in den Bergen und einem Staat, der kommt und geht. Siedlungspolitik “von unten” im georgischen Hochland. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Working Papers 92.Google Scholar
  26. Nodia, Ghia. 2005. Interview. In Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Interview 15 June 2005. www.rferl.org/content/article/1059289.html.
  27. Pallot, Judith. 1990. Rural Depopulation and the Restoration of the Russian Village Under Gorbachev. Soviet Studies 42 (2): 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott, Eric A. 2016. Familiar Strangers: The Georgian Diaspora and the Evolution of Soviet Empire. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, James C. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Suny, Ronald Grigor. 1994. The Making of the Georgian Nation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Tanner, Jakob. 2014. “Die Währung der Finanzmärkte ist Vertrauen”. Nachhaltigkeit und Hinterhältigkeit eines mentalen Phänomens in historischer Perspektive. In Was ist Vertrauen? Ein interdisziplinäres Gespräch, ed. J. Baberowski, 73–100. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  32. Tikhomirov, Alexey. 2013. The Regime of Forced Trust: Making and Breaking Emotional Bonds Between People and State in Soviet Russia, 1917–1941. Slavonic & East European Review 91 (1): 78–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tilly, Charles. 2005. Trust and Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tuite, Kevin. 1996. Highland Georgian Paganism: Archaism or Innovation? Annual of the Society for the Study of the Caucasus 7: 79–91.Google Scholar
  35. Weil, Rachel. 2014. A Plague of Informers: Conspiracy and Political Trust in William III’s England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiner, Annette. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yurchak, Alexei. 2006. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Mühlfried
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Anthropology ProgrammeIlia State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations