Advertisement

Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe: Discourses and Practices

  • Sofia Imane Bouterfas
  • Stela Raytcheva
  • Gilles Rouet
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter relates to the next one (Chap.  10) in order to propose, from a theoretical exploration of corporate social responsibility (CSR), an explanation of four cases of Responsabilité Sociale, Sociétale et Environnementale (RSE) strategies of multinational companies and the way organizations make sense of their strategies and practices.

Is CSR now related to the universality of values (and of hierarchies of values), in order to legitimize organizational practices? Even if the analysis highlights the diffusion of a new managerial model integrating the CSR, how does one envisage the communication between the practices and the discourses in different ideological, economic, and social contexts?

Keywords

CSR practices CSR discourses Local responsibility of companies 

References

  1. Ackerman, R. W. (1973). How Companies Respond to Social Demands. Harvard Business Review, 51(4), 88–98.Google Scholar
  2. Balmer, J. M. T., Fukukawa, K., & Gray, E. R. (2007). The Nature and Management of Ethical Corporate Identity: A Commentary on Corporate Identity, Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 7–15.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 794–816.Google Scholar
  4. Blake, D. H., Frederick, W. C., & Myers, M. S. (1976). Social Auditing: Evaluating the Impact of Corporate Programs. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  5. Bondy, K., & Starkey, K. (2014). The Dilemmas of Internationalization: Corporate Social Responsibility in the Multinational Corporation. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 4–22.Google Scholar
  6. Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  7. Carr, A. Z. (1968). Is Business Bluffing Ethical? Harvard Business Review, 46, 2–8.Google Scholar
  8. Côme, T., & Rouet, G. (2015). Les innovations managériales. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  9. Crilly, D., Ni, N., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Do-Not-Harm Versus Do-Good Social Responsibility: Attributional Thinking and the Liability of Foreignness. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1316–1329.Google Scholar
  10. Crowther, D. (2016). A Social Critique of Corporate Reporting: Semiotics and Web-based Integrated Reporting. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Geer, H., Borglund, T., & Frostenson, M. (2009). Reconciling CSR with the Role of the Corporation in Welfare States: The Problematic Swedish Example. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dierkes, M., & Berthoin Antal, A. (1986). Whither Corporate Social Reporting: Is It Time to Legislate? California Management Review, 28(3), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2001). GREEN PAPER: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. Available from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/committees/deve/20020122/com(2001)366_en.pdf
  14. European Commission. (2006). Launch of “European Alliance for Corporate Social Responsibility”. Available from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-06-358_en.htm
  15. European Commission. (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of the Regions: A Renewed EU Strategy 2011–14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. Available from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2011)0681_/com_com(2011)0681_en.pdf
  16. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine.Google Scholar
  19. Frimousse, S., & Peretti, J.-M. (2015). Regards croisés sur Engagement RSE & Performance. Question(s) de management, 1(9), 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gee, J.-P. (2009). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Gendre-Aegerter, D. (2008). La perception du dirigeant de PME de sa responsabilité sociale: une approche par la cartographie cognitive. Thèse de doctorat en sciences économiques et sociales, Université de Fribourg, Suisse.Google Scholar
  22. Gond, J.-P. (2006). Contribution à l’étude du concept de performance sociétale de l’entreprise: fondements théoriques, construction sociale, impact financier. Thèse de doctorat, Université Toulouse 1.Google Scholar
  23. Hunter, T., & Bansal, P. (2007). How Standard Is Standardized MNC Global Environmental Communication? Journal of Business Ethics, 71(2), 135–147.Google Scholar
  24. Lehtonen, M. (2000). The Cultural Analysis of Texts. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Lépineux, F. (2003). Dans quelle mesure une entreprise peut-elle être responsable à l’égard de la cohésion sociale? Thèse de doctorat, CNAM, Paris.Google Scholar
  26. Libaert, T. (2014). Communication et environnement, le pacte impossible. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  27. Maanvilja, L., & Lopez, J. (2008, March). CSR Europe. European Agenda.Google Scholar
  28. MacGillivray, A., Begley, P., & Zadek, S. (Eds.). (2007). The State of Responsible Competitiveness. London: AccountAbility.Google Scholar
  29. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  30. Mullenbach-Servayre, A. (2007). L’apport de la théorie des parties prenantes à la modélisation de la responsabilité sociétale des entreprises. La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 1(223), 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Muller, A. (2006). Global Versus Local CSR Strategies. European Management Journal, 24(2–3), 189–198.Google Scholar
  32. Mullerat, R. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: A European Perspective. Miami–Florida European Union Center of Excellence, 13(9). Available from http://aei.pitt.edu/43368/1/Mullerat_CSR_Europa.pdf
  33. Pasquero, J. (2005). La responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise comme objet des sciences de gestion: Un regard historique. In M.-F. Turcotte & A. Salmon (Eds.), Responsabilité sociale et environnementale de l’entreprise. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  34. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.Google Scholar
  35. Raytcheva, S., & Rouet, G. (2016). Le partage culturel au service du développement à l’international de la “culture française”. Communication, 34(1). Available from https://communication.revues.org/6659
  36. Wartick, S.-L., & Cochran, P.-L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wettstein, F. (2010). For Better or for Worse: Corporate Responsibility Beyond “Do No Harm”. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 275–283.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Imane Bouterfas
    • 1
  • Stela Raytcheva
    • 1
  • Gilles Rouet
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of VersaillesVersaillesFrance
  2. 2.Matej Bel UniversityBanská BystricaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations