Advertisement

Ichnography, Orthography and Scenography as Forms of Tracing the Past: A Reconstitution of the Roman Forum of Ebora Liberalitas Julia

  • Mariana Martins de CarvalhoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 26)

Abstract

The research presented in this paper is an attempt to understand the central core of a Roman city—the forum—from three different forms of representation: ichnography (plan), orthography (elevation) and scenography (perspective). Our laboratory is the monumental centre of Evora, located in the Alentejo, Portugal, where the urban ruins of the Roman temple are located. Here, we are attempting to trace the Roman forum of Ebora Liberalitas Julia, in the Roman province of Lusitania. In order to comprehend the remaining structure as a whole, a dissection of each fragment was carried out. This was analysed and all the archaeological remains were drawn over the current city plans. This was followed by hypothetical ichnographic, orthographic and scenographic projections which were started rising from this ground. These three forms of expression are the result of thought and invention, such as described by Vitruvius, in his chapter on the fundamental principles of architecture (I, II, 2). In these representations, it is possible to see how each one is increased with a dose of interpretation and analysis of hypotheses. The developed representations are supported not only by archaeological sources, but also by iconographic, literary and historic sources. To study and to draw Roman architecture in an urban context, it is essential to recognize the urban history and the phases through which each building has passed, in order to provide data that will add knowledge to the remaining architecture. Although the purpose of this study is to recognize Roman architecture, it is impossible, in an urban scenario such as this one, not to recognize other periods as well. Considering the importance of the sources and their semantic expression, this essay tries to fill the gap between different types of representation in order to increase the possibilities of a more accurate reconstitution. The ruins, and the archaeological remains that were exhumed, will be our experimental field to try to trace the presence of the past and the different configurations of this monumental centre, as carried out through evidence, knowledge and imagination.

Keywords

Urban ruins Evora forum Representation Ichnography Orthography Scenography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to recognize the valuable contribution of Gustavo Val-Flores, Municipality of Évora, the creator of the virtual model of the forum. Assignment co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the COMPETE 2020—Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI) and Portuguese national funds from the FCT under the POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007744 project. Illustrations from 1 to 4 are by the author, 2018; 5 and 6 are virtual models elaborated by Gustavo Val-Flores, 2018.

References

  1. 1.
    Carena C (1984) Ruina/ Restauro. In: Gil F (ed) (1984) Memória—História, Enciclopédia Einaudi (Vol 1). [Lisbon]: Imprensa Nacional—Casa da Moeda, p 129Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vitruvius (I, III, 1), Maciel MJ (2009) Vitrúvio: tratado de arquitectura. IST Press, Lisbon, p 40Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gros P (2011). L”Architecture Romaine: début du IIIe siècle av. J.-C. à la fin du Haut-Empire (3ª ed. Vol 1. Les monuments publics). Paris, Picard, p 207Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reis MP (2010). Tanques, fontes e espelhos de agua nos fora lusitanos. Studia Lusitana, p 286Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rivara JC (1845) O Templo de Diana e o Aqueduto de Sertório em Évora. Biblioteca Pública, ÉvoraGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hauschild T (1991) El Templo Romano de Évora. Cuadernos de Arquitectura Romana, 1, pp 107–117; Hauschild T (2001) Évora. Relatório preliminar sobre as escavações junto ao templo romano, 1989–1992. As construções. Lusíada. Arqueologia, História da Arte e Património, Série 1, pp 69–91, Hauschild T (2010) Algumas observações nas construções do foro de Ebora Liberalitas Iulia. Ciudad y foro en Lusitania Romana, Vol IV, pp 27–36; and the recently published report: Hauschild T, Teichner F (2017) Der römische Tempel in Évora (Portugal). Bauaufnahme, Ausgrabung, Wertung (Vol 35). Wiesbaden, ReichertGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gonçalves A, Hauschild T, Teichner F (1997) Intervenção Arqueológica no Museu de Évora, Centro Histórico de Évora, 1996. In Actas do 3º Encontro de Arqueologia Urbana, Almada, pp 123–136Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hauschild T, Sarantopoulos P (1995–1996) O tanque de água do templo romano de Évora. Notícia preliminar da intervenção arqueológica de 1996. O Arqueologo Português, 4ª serie, pp 429–440Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hauschild T (1981) El trabajo del arquitecto en las excavaciones. Caesaraugusta, p 150Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adkins L, Adkins RA (2009) Archaeological illustration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 137Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vitruvius (III, II, 6), Maciel MJ (2009) Vitrúvio: tratado de arquitectura. IST Presss, Lisbon, p 113Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carvalho MM (2018) From the ruin to the temple, passing by the butchers. A reconstitution of the “Temple of Diana” in Evora, based on literary and iconographic sources. In: Amoruso G (ed), Putting Tradition into Practice: Heritage, Place and Design, Milano, Springer, pp 147–159Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Adkins L, Adkins RA (2009) Archaeological illustration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 133Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations