Advertisement

Development: Ideal and Basics

  • Gerry O’ReillyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Key Challenges in Geography book series (KCHGE)

Abstract

The nexus between political-economy, development and discourses, bottom-up people’s needs and power of institutions such as the World Bank and IMF all comes into play here in the geopolitical analyses. Based on historical experiences and Utopian ideals, concepts regarding development are codified in the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The quest of assuring human needs entails elimination of hunger and poverty, and guaranteeing good health services and well-being, along with quality education and gender equality, clean water and sanitation, affordable clean energy, decent work and economic growth, with industry, innovation and infrastructure, and reducing inequalities, as well as creation of sustainable cities and communities. Along with this is the issue of responsible consumption and production, with action taken on climate change, policies and use of water and land environments. Central to this is peace, justice and strong institutions, with durable partnerships to implement sustainability. Basically, it can be argued that any action that does not alleviate poverty in some way cannot be called development but defining poverty has to be addressed in specific contexts. Conflicts remain the biggest threat to development and hence a human rights approach is imperative. Key development ideas must be linked to wider conceptual frameworks of globalisation and glocalization, and democratisation processes. Economic institutions such as the IMF and World Bank, WTO and economic governance all form part of the development interconnection.

Keywords

Development Discourses MDGs SDGs Empowerment Human rights Basic concepts Economic institutions 

References

  1. Allen T, Thomas A (eds) (2000) Poverty and development into the 21st century. Open University in association with Oxford University Press, Oxford and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Briant Carant J (2017) Unheard voices: a critical discourse analysis of the millennium development goals’ evolution into the sustainable development goals. Third World Q 38(1):16–41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436597.2016.1166944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chambers R (1997) Whose reality counts: putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chambers R (2002) Participatory Workshops: a sourcebook of 21 sets of ideas and activities. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Chambers R (2005) Ideas for development. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambers R (2008) Revolutions in development inquiry. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Chambers R (2010) Provocations for development. Practical Action Publishing, RugbyGoogle Scholar
  8. Chari S, Corbridge S (eds) (2008a) The development reader. Routledge, Oxford and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Chari S, Corbridge S (2008b) The Development Reader. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Hickel J (2016) The true extent of global poverty and hunger: questioning the good news narrative of the millennium development goals. Third World Q 37(5):749–767. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs//10.1080/01436597.2015.1109439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IMF (2018) World economic and financial surveys: world economic outlook database. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2018/01/weodata/index.aspx
  12. Kothari U (ed) (2005) A radical history of development studies. Zed Books, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Kothari U, Minogue M (eds) (2002) Development theory and practice: critical perspectives. Palgrave, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  14. Narayan D, Chambers R, Shah N, Petesch P (1999) Global synthesis: consultations with the poor. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  15. Payne A (2005) The global politics of unequal development. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rapley J (1996) Understanding development: theory and practice in the third world. Lynne RiennerGoogle Scholar
  17. Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urbanisation 4(2):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schuurman FS (ed.) (1996) beyond the impasse: new directions in development theory, 2nd ed. Zed Books: London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Clarendon Press, Oxford, p 1981Google Scholar
  20. Sumner A, Tribe M (2008) International development studies: theories and methods in research and practice. Sage, London and CaliforniaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Takshead AA, Hubyab M, Frantzic S, Lovettad JC (2010) Dealing with pollution from conflict: analysis of discourses around the 2006 Lebanon oil spill. J Environ Manag 91:887–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. UN FAO (2002) Emergency field operations pocket book. https://www.unicef.org/emerg/files/WFP_manual.pdf
  23. Wackernagel M (1994) Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability (Ph.D. thesis). School of Community and Regional Planning. The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  24. Willis K (2005) Theories and practices of development. Routledge, Oxford and New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of History and Geography, St. Patrick’s CampusDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations